LESS THAN HUMAN 毎日の、毎日が、変わる。
最後にも記載していますが、この投稿は、決して読者の方の離婚を推奨するものでもなく、法律的に認められていない関係を助長するものではありません。あくまで、エンターテイメントです。 小説と思ってください。
読んでから文句を言われても困ります。
洋の東西を問わず、考えていること、やっていることは同じですね。
Contrary to conventional wisdom, sometimes it’s men who first lose sexual desire in a long-term relationship, a new study finds.
Men’s desire for sex can be as tricky as women’s, according to researchers at the University of Kentucky. Men often lose interest when they feel insecure, when they worry they are losing autonomy in a relationship, or when physical changes cause embarrassment. Pressure to be the initiator compounds the stress.
WHAT TO DO WHEN A MAN’S SEX DRIVE FLAGS?
Have reasonable expectations. Don’t buy into the stereotype that says men are always ready to have sex.
Be open to talking, and try not to get offended. Think of it as a chance to improve the relationship.
Consider therapy. If the male partner is reluctant to go, the woman can suggest he talk to the therapist on the phone.
Have the woman initiate. Often couples have a “sexual script” where the man always initiates. The woman can take some of the pressure off him by starting the interaction.
Pick your timing. Don’t have the conversation when you’re in the middle of a sexual situation.
Focus on the positive. Rather than a criticism—“we never have sex anymore”—tell your partner you miss being intimate.
Do new nonsexual things together.Take up a new hobby, try a new cuisine, ride a roller coaster.
Change your environment. Try the shower, the guest room, in front of the fire.
“We expect male desire to always be high and to be simple, like an on and off switch, while we expect women’s desire to be a complicated switchboard, but they are both complex,” says Kristen P. Mark, associate professor of health promotion and director of the Sexual Health Promotion Lab at the University of Kentucky and the lead researcher on the study, a broad look at men and women that analyzed 64 studies on sexual desire conducted since the 1950s.
Psychologists say desire in both sexes ebbs and flows. And it’s natural for it to decline after the heady honeymoon period, which typically lasts about 18 months to two years. Still, almost 80% of married couples have sex a few times a month or more: 32% reported having sex two to three times per week; 47% reported having sex a few times a month, according to “The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States,” a 1994 University of Chicago study considered the most comprehensive in the field.
上のデータは嘘っぱちと思います。誰が厳密な回数をアンケートに答えるのでしょうか。 情事の場所は通常なら二人の場所。 数字を盛っているのに違いないです笑。
人生５０年で死んでいた時代なら、夫婦の交接度合いはちょうど良かったのでしょうね。
BONDS: ON RELATIONSHIPS
Women do lose desire more often than men: Research shows that about one out of three women—regardless of age—report a lack of interest in sex for at least several months in the past year, compared with one in five men, according to Edward Laumann, a professor of sociology at the University of Chicago, who has studied sexual desire and dysfunction for 25 years. But experts say that men are often reluctant to talk about sexual troubles, so the problem may be more prevalent.
Dr. Mark’s research, published in March in the Journal of Sex Research, found that the reasons for a drop in desire generally fit into three main categories—individual, interpersonal and societal. Some issues, such as stress, a drop in self-esteem or changes in their attraction to their partner, affect both men and women.
But men’s desire also wanes for different reasons. Men have trouble when they expect their desire to always remain high and it does not, or when they fail to make their relationship a priority. Sometimes men’s desire drops when a couple has sex for negative reasons—to avoid a fight, for example—rather than positive ones, such as to increase intimacy. Men also feel pressure to always be ready for sex and to initiate it.
There are often physical issues, as well. A man’s less-efficient blood flow as he ages, diseases such as depression, or medicines for issues such as high blood pressure or mood disorders can all hurt a man’s sex drive.
And these physical changes can cause emotional distress. Embarrassment is a big issue for men who have trouble getting or maintaining an erection, and so they may stop initiating sex. “For the guys who don’t like to do what they don’t do well, there will be avoidance, because they feel ashamed,” says Michael A. Perelman, co-director of Weill Cornell Medicine’s Human Sexuality Program.
肉的的な変化によって、勃起が維持出来ないから、恥ずかしくて交接を仕掛けることを男たちは躊躇しているように記載をしていますが、相手が変われば機能するというのも現状だと生物学者、人類学者の間での常識となっています。
馬の法則と同じで、同じ雌馬と３回したら、雄馬はその雌馬に対して射精をすることはないと言います。 本当なのかどうかは知りません。 都市伝説でなく農業伝説なのかもしれません。
Unlike women, men often lose interest in sex when they are unhappy or insecure, Dr. Laumann says. Stress about a promotion, worry about a child, the transition to retirement “all undercut a man’s sense of his abilities and prowess,” he says.
And sometimes the problem does stem from the relationship. Sex can become routine in a long-term marriage, or partners grow apart. A man may harbor resentments, often about money. Or he may de-eroticize his wife. “He sees her as a good person, mother, supporter, but not as an exciting lover,” says Barry McCarthy, a psychology professor at American University.
心理学者が語らなくてもいいような内容で、当たり前のことですが、
妻を、母、サポーター、助手、女中として見て、エキサイティングな交接のパートナーとして見れないこと。
それには原因もあるでしょう。 おっさん化した妻に対して、セクシャルファンタジーをもてる人がどれだけいるのかもあるでしょう。
世界規模で活躍する経営者の牛睾丸玉三郎氏は、
「俺は仕事と交尾は家庭に持ち込まない」
と豪語しています。
Is the relationship doomed when a man—or a woman, for that matter—loses interest in sex? Not necessarily. But it’s definitely a signal that you need to evaluate what is going on. And there is the possibility that a decrease in desire for your partner may indicate that the person is no longer right for you, says Gurit Birnbaum, a social psychologi
st and associate professor of psychology at the Interdisciplinary Center, a private university in Herzliya, Israel. You may have grown too far apart, or your goals, values or interests may have changed. “Your body may be telling you something,” she says.
このうえのパラグラフは、ツボを押さえています。
意訳すると、男性が中折れする相手に対しては無理してFornication をやっているわけであり、男性にとってはその女性はタイプではないのかもしれない。
身体は正直である。と言っています。
バイアグラ、レビトラ、シアリスなどが爆発的に売れているのは、少々タイプでない女性としたり、無理やり妻としなければいけないというプレッシャーがあるわけです。
But often the problems can be solved. This will require talking, the experts say, and it’s important to do that before it is too late. “A relationship becomes more fragile when it loses its sex aspect,” says Dr. Birnbaum.
Start by having a conversation outside of a sexual situation—go for a walk or have a glass of wine. Tell your spouse you miss having sex rather than criticizing. Both partners should ease pressure by accepting that men, not just women, don’t want sex all the time. “Approaching hard conversations by being vulnerable up front automatically creates a safer environment for a tough talk,” says Dr. Mark.
このパラグラフで、記事として書く限り、綺麗事を言わざるをえないから言っています。
配偶者との関係で交接がないことを批判するより、
https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-doesnt-your-husband-want-to-have-sex-1526122800?mod=e2fb
WHAT TO DO WHEN A MAN’S SEX DRIVE FLAGS?
Have reasonable expectations. Don’t buy into the stereotype that says men are always ready to have sex.
Be open to talking, and try not to get offended. Think of it as a chance to improve the relationship.
Consider therapy. If the male partner is reluctant to go, the woman can suggest he talk to the therapist on the phone.
セラピストに行けと言ってますがそんな問題ではないです。
相手を変えたら、セクシャルファンタジーは別のものになります。
Pick your timing. Don’t have the conversation when you’re in the middle of a sexual situation.
Focus on the positive. Rather than a criticism—“we never have sex anymore”—tell your partner you miss being intimate.
Change your environment. Try the shower, the guest room, in front of the fire.
そんな問題じゃないでしょう。
結論として、
要するに、この記事自体は旦那と妻が数十年の長期間婚姻関係にあることを前提に書かれています。
さて、現状はどうでしょう。
小生の周りのつがいは、８９パーセントは離婚しています。
婚姻関係のまま５０代、６０代を迎えている場合は、交接をしていようがしていまいが夫婦の仲は保たれているわけです。
他人がどうのこうのいう問題ではありません。
Fornication フォーニケーションをしたい人は食事と同じようにいつも家で食べるだけではないように、外食をしたい人は外食をしているとも言えるでしょう。詳しいことは言いません。
人生１００年プランの常識の変革をWall Street Journal がアメリカで記載できるわけがありません。
つまり、この記事は長期間婚姻関係にある人、そして、離婚を繰り返す人たちにとっては、当てはまらないので、無意味な記事であるとも言えます。
人生１００年の倫理観を持とう。
この投稿は、決して、読者の方の離婚を推奨するものでもなく、法律的に認められていない関係を助長するものではありません。 あくまで、エンターテイメントです。 小説と思ってください。
LESS THAN HUMAN道を見つけたり
幽霊や超常現象を扱わない現代科学 でも有名な科学者は宗教の力を使ってきた
8月も終わりに近づいています。夏休みに子供を連れて、科学館やプラネタリウムなど、さまざま場所を訪れた方も多いのではないでしょうか。
また、お盆などに、幽霊や超常現象、ホラーを扱ったテレビ番組や映画などをご覧になった方もいるでしょう。
幽霊を見たり、超常現象を体験した人は数多くいるにもかかわらず、現代の科学では、「あの世や霊、魂、神は存在しない」という前提の下、研究が行われています。
しかし、約3000年もの長きにわたって、「科学と宗教は一体のもの」というのが、常識でした。
ゼロ除算の発見は日本です：
∞？？？
∞は定まった数ではない・・・・
人工知能はゼロ除算ができるでしょうか：
とても興味深く読みました：2014年2月2日
ゼロ除算の発見と重要性を指摘した：日本、再生核研究所
ゼロ除算関係論文・本
ゼロ除算算法を使うとどうでしょうか？？？
有限の値が出るのですがいかがでしょうか・・
テーマ：
The null set is conceptually similar to the role of the number “zero” as it is used in quantum field theory. In quantum field theory, one can take the empty set, the vacuum, and generate all possible physical configurations of the Universe being modelled by acting on it with creation operators, and one can similarly change from one thing to another by applying mixtures of creation and anihillation operators to suitably filled or empty states. The anihillation operator applied to the vacuum, however, yields zero.
Zero in this case is the null set – it stands, quite literally, for no physical state in the Universe. The important point is that it is not possible to act on zero with a creation operator to create something; creation operators only act on the vacuum which is empty but not zero. Physicists are consequently fairly comfortable with the existence of operations that result in “nothing” and don’t even require that those operations be contradictions, only operationally non-invertible.
It is also far from unknown in mathematics. When considering the set of all real numbers as quantities and the operations of ordinary arithmetic, the “empty set” is algebraically the number zero (absence of any quantity, positive or negative). However, when one performs a division operation algebraically, one has to be careful to exclude division by zero from the set of permitted operations! The result of division by zero isn’t zero, it is “not a number” or “undefined” and is not in the Universe of real numbers.
Just as one can easily “prove” that 1 = 2 if one does algebra on this set of numbers as if one can divide by zero legitimately3.34, so in logic one gets into trouble if one assumes that the set of all things that are in no set including the empty set is a set within the algebra, if one tries to form the set of all sets that do not include themselves, if one asserts a Universal Set of Men exists containing a set of men wherein a male barber shaves all men that do not shave themselves3.35.
It is not – it is the null set, not the empty set, as there can be no male barbers in a non-empty set of men (containing at least one barber) that shave all men in that set that do not shave themselves at a deeper level than a mere empty list. It is not an empty set that could be filled by some algebraic operation performed on Real Male Barbers Presumed to Need Shaving in trial Universes of Unshaven Males as you can very easily see by considering any particular barber, perhaps one named “Socrates”, in any particular Universe of Men to see if any of the sets of that Universe fit this predicate criterion with Socrates as the barber. Take the empty set (no men at all). Well then there are no barbers, including Socrates, so this cannot be the set we are trying to specify as it clearly must contain at least one barber and we’ve agreed to call its relevant barber Socrates. (and if it contains more than one, the rest of them are out of work at the moment).
Suppose a trial set contains Socrates alone. In the classical rendition we ask, does he shave himself? If we answer “no”, then he is a member of this class of men who do not shave themselves and therefore must shave himself. Oops. Well, fine, he must shave himself. However, if he does shave himself, according to the rules he can only shave men who don’t shave themselves and so he doesn’t shave himself. Oops again. Paradox. When we try to apply the rule to a potential Socrates to generate the set, we get into trouble, as we cannot decide whether or not Socrates should shave himself.
Note that there is no problem at all in the existential set theory being proposed. In that set theory either Socrates must shave himself as All Men Must Be Shaven and he’s the only man around. Or perhaps he has a beard, and all men do not in fact need shaving. Either way the set with just Socrates does not contain a barber that shaves all men because Socrates either shaves himself or he doesn’t, so we shrug and continue searching for a set that satisfies our description pulled from an actual Universe of males including barbers. We immediately discover that adding more men doesn’t matter. As long as those men, barbers or not, either shave themselves or Socrates shaves them they are consistent with our set description (although in many possible sets we find that hey, other barbers exist and shave other men who do not shave themselves), but in no case can Socrates (as our proposed single barber that shaves all men that do not shave themselves) be such a barber because he either shaves himself (violating the rule) or he doesn’t (violating the rule). Instead of concluding that there is a paradox, we observe that the criterion simply doesn’t describe any subset of any possible Universal Set of Men with no barbers, including the empty set with no men at all, or any subset that contains at least Socrates for any possible permutation of shaving patterns including ones that leave at least some men unshaven altogether.
I understand your note as if you are saying the limit is infinity but nothing is equal to infinity, but you concluded corretly infinity is undefined. Your example of getting the denominator smaller and smalser the result of the division is a very large number that approches infinity. This is the intuitive mathematical argument that plunged philosophy into mathematics. at that level abstraction mathematics, as well as phyisics become the realm of philosophi. The notion of infinity is more a philosopy question than it is mathamatical. The reason we cannot devide by zero is simply axiomatic as Plato pointed out. The underlying reason for the axiom is because sero is nothing and deviding something by nothing is undefined. That axiom agrees with the notion of limit infinity, i.e. undefined. There are more phiplosphy books and thoughts about infinity in philosophy books than than there are discussions on infinity in math books.
ゼロ除算の歴史：ゼロ除算はゼロで割ることを考えるであるが、アリストテレス以来問題とされ、ゼロの記録がインドで初めて６２８年になされているが、既にそのとき、正解1/0が期待されていたと言う。しかし、理論づけられず、その後１３００年を超えて、不可能である、あるいは無限、無限大、無限遠点とされてきたものである。
An Earl
y Reference to Division by Zero C. B. Boyer
OUR HUMANITY AND DIVISION BY ZERO
Lea esta bitácora en español
There is a mathematical concept that says that division by zero has no meaning, or is an undefined expression, because it is impossible to have a real number that could be multiplied by zero in order to obtain another number different from zero.
While this mathematical concept has been held as true for centuries, when it comes to the human level the present situation in global societies has, for a very long time, been contradicting it. It is true that we don’t all live in a mathematical world or with mathematical concepts in our heads all the time. However, we cannot deny that societies around the globe are trying to disprove this simple mathematical concept: that division by zero is an impossible equation to solve.
Yes! We are all being divided by zero tolerance, zero acceptance, zero love, zero compassion, zero willingness to learn more about the other and to find intelligent and fulfilling ways to adapt to new ideas, concepts, ways of doing things, people and cultures. We are allowing these ‘zero denominators’ to run our equations, our lives, our souls.
Each and every single day we get more divided and distanced from other people who are different from us. We let misinformation and biased concepts divide us, and we buy into these aberrant concepts in such a way, that we get swept into this division by zero without checking our consciences first.
I believe, however, that if we change the zeros in any of the “divisions by zero” that are running our lives, we will actually be able to solve the non-mathematical concept of this equation: the human concept.
>I believe deep down that we all have a heart, a conscience, a brain to think with, and, above all, an immense desire to learn and evolve. And thanks to all these positive things that we do have within, I also believe that we can use them to learn how to solve our “division by zero” mathematical impossibility at the human level. I am convinced that the key is open communication and an open heart. Nothing more, nothing less.
Are we scared of, or do we feel baffled by the way another person from another culture or country looks in comparison to us? Are we bothered by how people from other cultures dress, eat, talk, walk, worship, think, etc.? Is this fear or bafflement so big that we much rather reject people and all the richness they bring within?
How about if instead of rejecting or retreating from that person—division of our humanity by zero tolerance or zero acceptance—we decided to give them and us a chance?
How about changing that zero tolerance into zero intolerance? Why not dare ask questions about the other person’s culture and way of life? Let us have the courage to let our guard down for a moment and open up enough for this person to ask us questions about our culture and way of life. How about if we learned to accept that while a person from another culture is living and breathing in our own culture, it is totally impossible for him/her to completely abandon his/her cultural values in order to become what we want her to become?
Let’s be totally honest with ourselves at least: Would any of us really renounce who we are and where we come from just to become what somebody else asks us to become?
If we are not willing to lose our identity, why should we ask somebody else to lose theirs?
I believe with all my heart that if we practiced positive feelings—zero intolerance, zero non-acceptance, zero indifference, zero cruelty—every day, the premise that states that division by zero is impossible would continue being true, not only in mathematics, but also at the human level. We would not be divided anymore; we would simply be building a better world for all of us.
Hoping to have touched your soul in a meaningful way,
Adriana Adarve, Asheville, NC
…/our-humanity-and-division…/
5000年？？？？？
2017年09月01日(金)NEW !
テーマ：数学
Former algebraic approach was formally perfect, but it merely postulated existence of sets and morphisms [18] without showing methods to construct them. The primary concern of modern algebras is not how an operation can be performed, but whether it maps into or onto and the like abstract issues [19–23]. As important as this may be for proofs, the nature does not really care about all that. The PM’s concerns were not constructive, even though theoretically significant. We need thus an approach that is more relevant to operations performed in nature, which never complained about morphisms or the allegedly impossible division by zero, as far as I can tell. Abstract sets and morphisms should be de-emphasized as hardly operational. My decision to come up with a definite way to implement the feared division by zero was not really arbitrary, however. It has removed a hidden paradox from number theory and an obvious absurd from algebraic group theory. It was necessary step for full deployment of constructive, synthetic mathematics (SM) [2,3]. Problems hidden in PM implicitly affect all who use mathematics, even though we may not always be aware of their adverse impact on our thinking. Just take a look at the paradox that emerges from the usual prescription for multiplication of zeros that remained uncontested for some 5000 years 0 0 ¼ 0 ) 0 1=1 ¼ 0 ) 0 1 ¼ 0 1) 1ð? ¼ ?Þ1 ð0aÞ This ‘‘fact’’ was covered up by the infamous prohibition on division by zero [2]. How ingenious. If one is prohibited from dividing by zero one could not obtain this paradox. Yet the prohibition did not really make anything right. It silenced objections to irresponsible reasonings and prevented corrections to the PM’s flamboyant axiomatizations. The prohibition on treating infinity as invertible counterpart to zero did not do any good either. We use infinity in calculus for symbolic calculations of limits [24], for zero is the infinity’s twin [25], and also in projective geometry as well as in geometric mapping of complex numbers. Therein a sphere is cast onto the plane that is tangent to it and its free (opposite) pole in a point at infinity [26–28]. Yet infinity as an inverse to the natural zero removes the whole absurd (0a), for we obtain [2] 0 ¼ 1=1 ) 0 0 ¼ 1=12 > 0 0 ð0bÞ Stereographic projection of complex numbers tacitly contradicted the PM’s prescribed way to multiply zeros, yet it was never openly challenged. The old formula for multiplication of zeros (0a) is valid only as a practical approximation, but it is group-theoretically inadmissible in no-nonsense reasonings. The tiny distinction in formula (0b) makes profound theoretical difference for geometries and consequently also for physical applications. T
とても興味深く読みました：
10,000 Year Clock
by Renny Pritikin
Conversation with Paolo Salvagione, lead engineer on the 10,000-year clock project, via e-mail in February 2010.
For an introduction to what we’re talking about here’s a short excerpt from a piece by Michael Chabon, published in 2006 in Details: ….Have you heard of this thing? It is going to be a kind of gigantic mechanical computer, slow, simple and ingenious, marking the hour, the day, the year, the century, the millennium, and the precession of the equinoxes, with a huge orrery to keep track of the immense ticking of the six naked-eye planets on their great orbital mainspring. The Clock of the Long Now will stand sixty feet tall, cost tens of millions of dollars, and when completed its designers and supporters plan to hide it in a cave in the Great Basin National Park in Nevada, a day’s hard walking from anywhere. Oh, and it’s going to run for ten thousand years. But even if the Clock of the Long Now fails to last ten thousand years, even if it breaks down after half or a quarter or a tenth that span, this mad contraption will already have long since fulfilled its purpose. Indeed the Clock may have accomplished its greatest task bef
ore it is ever finished, perhaps without ever being built at all. The point of the Clock of the Long Now is not to measure out the passage, into their unknown future, of the race of creatures that built it. The point of the Clock is to revive and restore the whole idea of the Future, to get us thinking about the Future again, to the degree if not in quite the way same way that we used to do, and to reintroduce the notion that we don’t just bequeath the future—though we do, whether we think about it or not. We also, in the very broadest sense of the first person plural pronoun, inherit it.
Renny Pritikin: When we were talking the other day I said that this sounds like a cross between Borges and the vast underground special effects from Forbidden Planet. I imagine you hear lots of comparisons like that…
Paolo Salvagione: (laughs) I can’t say I’ve heard that comparison. A childhood friend once referred to the project as a cross between Tinguely and Fabergé. When talking about the clock, with people, there’s that divide-by-zero moment (in the early days of computers to divide by zero was a sure way to crash the computer) and I can understand why. Where does one place, in one’s memory, such a thing, such a concept? After the pause, one could liken it to a reboot, the questions just start streaming out.
RP: OK so I think the word for that is nonplussed. Which the thesaurus matches with flummoxed, bewildered, at a loss. So the question is why even (I assume) fairly sophisticated people like your friends react like that. Is it the physical scale of the plan, or the notion of thinking 10,000 years into the future—more than the length of human history?
PS: I’d say it’s all three and more. I continue to be amazed by the specificity of the questions asked. Anthropologists ask a completely different set of questions than say, a mechanical engineer or a hedge fund manager. Our disciplines tie us to our perspectives. More than once, a seemingly innocent question has made an impact on the design of the clock. It’s not that we didn’t know the answer, sometimes we did, it’s that we hadn’t thought about it from the perspective of the person asking the question. Back to your question. I think when sophisticated people, like you, thread this concept through their own personal narrative it tickles them. Keeping in mind some people hate to be tickled.
RP: Can you give an example of a question that redirected the plan? That’s really so interesting, that all you brainiacs slaving away on this project and some amateur blithely pinpoints a problem or inconsistency or insight that spins it off in a different direction. It’s like the butterfly effect.
PS: Recently a climatologist pointed out that our equation of time cam, (photo by Rolfe Horn) (a cam is a type of gear: link) a device that tracks the difference between solar noon and mundane noon as well as the precession of the equinoxes, did not account for the redistribution of water away from the earth’s poles. The equation-of-time cam is arguably one of the most aesthetically pleasing parts of the clock. It also happens to be one that is fairly easy to explain. It visually demonstrates two extremes. If you slice it, like a loaf of bread, into 10,000 slices each slice would represent a year. The outside edge of the slice, let’s call it the crust, represents any point in that year, 365 points, 365 days. You could, given the right amount of magnification, divide it into hours, minutes, even seconds. Stepping back and looking at the unsliced cam the bottom is the year 2000 and the top is the year 12000. The twist that you see is the precession of the equinoxes. Now here’s the fun part, there’s a slight taper to the twist, that’s the slowing of the earth on its axis. As the ice at the poles melts we have a redistribution of water, we’re all becoming part of the “slow earth” movement.
RP: Are you familiar with Charles Ray’s early work in which you saw a plate on a table, or an object on the wall, and they looked stable, but were actually spinning incredibly slowly, or incredibly fast, and you couldn’t tell in either case? Or, more to the point, Tim Hawkinson’s early works in which he had rows of clockwork gears that turned very very fast, and then down the line, slower and slower, until at the end it approached the slowness that you’re dealing with?
PS: The spinning pieces by Ray touches on something we’re trying to avoid. We want you to know just how fast or just how slow the various parts are moving. The beauty of the Ray piece is that you can’t tell, fast, slow, stationary, they all look the same. I’m not familiar with the Hawkinson clockwork piece. I’ve see the clock pieces where he hides the mechanism and uses unlikely objects as the hands, such as the brass clasp on the back of a manila envelope or the tab of a coke can.
RP: Spin Sink (1 Rev./100 Years) (1995), in contrast, is a 24-foot-long row of interlocking gears, the smallest of which is driven by a whirring toy motor that in turn drives each consecutively larger and more slowly turning gear up to the largest of all, which rotates approximately once every one hundred years.
PS: I don’t know how I missed it, it’s gorgeous. Linking the speed that we can barely see with one that we rarely have the patience to wait for.
RP: : So you say you’ve opted for the clock’s time scale to be transparent. How will the clock communicate how fast it’s going?
PS: By placing the clock in a mountain we have a reference to long time. The stratigraphy provides us with the slowest metric. The clock is a middle point between millennia and seconds. Looking back 10,000 years we find the beginnings of civilization. Looking at an earthenware vessel from that era we imagine its use, the contents, the craftsman. The images painted or inscribed on the outside provide some insight into the lives and the languages of the distant past. Often these interpretations are flawed, biased or over-reaching. What I’m most enchanted by is that we continue to construct possible pasts around these objects, that our curiosity is overwhelming. We line up to see the treasures of Tut, or the remains of frozen ancestors. With the clock we are asking you to create possible futures, long futures, and with them the narratives that made them happen.
ダ・ヴィンチの名言 格言｜無こそ最も素晴らしい存在
ゼロ除算の発見はどうでしょうか：
Black holes are where God divided by zero：
再生核研究所声明371（2017.6.27）ゼロ除算の講演― 国際会議
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
ソクラテス・プラトン・アリストテレス その他
ドキュメンタリー 2017: 神の数式 第２回 宇宙はなぜ生まれたのか
〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式 完全版 第3回 宇宙はなぜ始まったのか
&t=3318s
〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式 完全版 第1回 この世は何からできているのか
NHKスペシャル 神の数式 完全版 第4回 異次元宇宙は存在するか
再生核研究所声明 411(2018.02.02): ゼロ除算発見4周年を迎えて
再生核研究所声明 416(2018.2.20): ゼロ除算をやってどういう意味が有りますか。何か意味が有りますか。何になるのですか － 回答
再生核研究所声明 417(2018.2.23): ゼロ除算って何ですか － 中学生、高校生向き 回答
再生核研究所声明 418(2018.2.24): 割り算とは何ですか？ ゼロ除算って何ですか － 小学生、中学生向き 回答
再生核研究所声明 420(2018.3.2): ゼロ除算は
しいですか，合っていますか、信用できますか － 回答
2018.3.18．午前中 最後の講演： 日本数学会 東大駒場、函数方程式論分科会 講演書画カメラ用 原稿
The Japanese Mathematical Society, Annual Meeting at the University of Tokyo. 2018.3.18.
より
*057 Pinelas,S./Caraballo,T./Kloeden,P./Graef,J.(eds.): Differential and Difference Equations with Applications: ICDDEA, Amadora, 2017. (Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 230) May 2018 587 pp.
再生核研究所声明 424(2018.3.29): レオナルド・ダ・ヴィンチとゼロ除算
再生核研究所声明 427(2018.5.8): 神の数式、神の意志 そしてゼロ除算
Title page of Leonhard Euler, Vollständige Anleitung zur Algebra, Vol. 1 (edition of 1771, first published in 1770), and p. 34 from Article 83, where Euler explains why a number divided by zero gives infinity.
私は数学を信じない。 アルバート・アインシュタイン / I don’t believe in mathematics. Albert Einstein→ゼロ除算ができなかったからではないでしょうか。
1423793753.460.341866474681。
Einstein’s Only Mistake: Division by Zero
ゼロ除算は定義が問題です：
再生核研究所声明 １４８（2014.2.12） 100/0=0, 0/0=0 － 割り算の考えを自然に拡張すると ― 神の意志
再生核研究所声明１７１（2014.7.30）掛け算の意味と割り算の意味 ― ゼロ除算100/0=0は自明である？
Title page of Leonhard Euler, Vollständige Anleitung zur Algebra, Vol. 1 (edition of 1771, first published in 1770), and p. 34 from Article 83, where Euler explains why a number divided by zero gives infinity.
私は数学を信じない。 アルバート・アインシュタイン / I don’t believe in mathematics. Albert Einstein→ゼロ除算ができなかったからではないでしょうか。1423793753.460.341866474681。
Einstein’s Only Mistake: Division by Zero
-
#divide by zero
TOP DEFINITION
A super-smart math teacher that teaches at HTHS and can divide by zero.
Hey look, that genius’s IQ is over 9000!
by October 21, 2009
Dividing by zero is the biggest known to mankind. It is a proven fact that a succesful division by zero will constitute in the implosion of the universe.
You are dividing by zero there, Johnny. Captain Kirk is not impressed.
Divide by zero?!?!! OMG!!! Epic failzorz
3
by is undefined.
Divide by zero is undefined.
by October 28, 2006
1) The number one ingredient for a catastrophic event in which the universe enfolds and collapses on itself and life as we know it ceases to exist.
2) A mathematical equation such as a/0 whereas a is some number and 0 is the divisor. Look it up on or something. Pretty confusing shit.
3) A reason for an error in programming
Hey, I divided by zero! …Oh shi-
a/0
Run-time error: ’11’: Division by zero
by September 08, 2006
When even math shows you that not everything can be figured out with math. When you divide by zero, math kicks you in the shins and says “yeah, there’s kind of an answer, but it ain’t just some number.”
It’s when mathematicians become philosophers.
:
Let’s say you have ZERO apples, and THREE people. How many apples does each person get? ZERO, cause there were no apples to begin withbecause of dividing by zero:
Let’s say there are THREE apples, and ZERO people. How many apples does each person get? Friggin… How the should I know! How can you figure out how many apples each person gets if there’s no people to get them?!? You’d think it’d be infinity, but not really. It could almost be any number, cause you could be like “each person gets 400 apples” which would be true, because all the people did get 400 apples, because there were no people. So all the people also got 42 apples, and a million and 7 apples. But it’s still wrong.by February 15, 2010
なぜかLESS THAN HUMANがロシアで大ブーム
Aired April 18, 2018 – 04:00 ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
CARL AZUZ, CNN 10 ANCHOR: CNN 10 is your objective explanation of today`s news and I`m your anchor, Carl Azuz. It`s great to have you watching. Today`s show starts with a pair of significant cases in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.
The first involves part of a federal law that concerned immigrants to the U.S. It said that people who came to the country legally but who were not American citizens could be deported if they`ve been convicted of crimes of violence. Both the Obama and Trump administrations supported the law when it came to a legal immigrant from the Philippines who was convicted twice of home burglary in California.
At first, a lower court ruled that his convictions amounted to a crime of violence. But the man`s lawyers appealed the decision, arguing their client wasn`t given notice that his crimes would result in deportation, and that the “crimes of violence” part of the law wasn`t clear enough.
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court decided the law was too vague to be constitutional because Congress didn`t define what exactly would qualify as a violent crime. So, in this case, the immigrant from the Philippines won`t be automatically deported.
The ruling is limited though. Experts say the government can still deport legal immigrants convicted of obvious violent crimes like murder.
The second case involves sales tax in the Internet. Oftentimes, when you buy something online in the U.S., you don`t have to pay sales tax, unless you`re buying from Amazon itself, which charges it in most states, or if you`re shopping at a retail company that has a physical store in your state.
South Dakota wants this changed. It says states are missing out on billions of dollars in e-commerce taxes when people don`t pay them online, and it wants companies that sell more than $100,000 worth of goods in a year to collect taxes for South Dakota.
But many smaller businesses like ones that sell on eBay don`t want to be forced to collect taxes. They say they`ll lose thousands of they have to charge sales tax and that the different taxes that states and cities have are too complicated to keep up with. The Supreme Court`s decision on this is expected to come at around the beginning of summer.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
AZUZ (voice-over): Ten-second trivia:
Which of these Japanese companies started making cars in 1917?
Mitsubishi, Honda, Toyota, or Mazda?
The first company on this list to produce a car was the Mitsubishi Shipbuilding Company which introduced its Model A in 1917.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
AZUZ: Right now, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is visiting U.S. President Donald Trump at his estate in Florida. The two leaders will be
talking about North Korea.
Japan is a close ally of the U.S. and Prime Minister Abe is concerned about the direct talks that are planned between President Trump and North Korean
dictator Kim Jong Un. Japan`s worried that its interests and safety could be left out.
Another concern on Mr. Abe`s mind, the new tariffs that the Trump administration has placed on steel and aluminum imports from other
countries. Japan wants an exemption from those tariffs. So, trade would be a major factor in their meeting.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I`ll talk to Prime Minister Abe of Japan and others, great guy, friend of mine, and they`ll be a little
smile in their face and the smile is I can`t believe we`ve been able to take advantage of the United States for so long.
ANNA STEWART, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): The U.S. has a $68.8 billion trade deficit with Japan. And at least 70 percent of that is the auto
industry. Despite Japan having zero car import tariffs, while Japan car brands Nissan, Honda and Toyota are a regular sight in the U.S., it`s a
different story here.
(on camera): There are just four American automakers with dealerships in Japan. That`s Chrysler, GM, Tesla and Jeep. And it`s pretty rare to see
any of them. In fact, having done a tour of this lovely parking lot, I found just one American car out of 66.
(voice-over): It tallies with the general stats for the country. Last month, American car sales were dwarfed by European and domestic brands.
Over 80 percent of the American car sold were Jeep.
PONTUS HAGGSTROM, PRESIDENT AND CEO, FCA JAPAN: We committed to this market.
STEWART: From side view mirrors that fold, to Japan`s narrow garages, to a right hand drive —
(on camera): Arigato.
(voice-over): — Jeep has tailored its cars to the Japanese consumer. There were also things like noise and exhaust standards.
HAGGSTROM: There are a few things that are unique to Japan. There are regulations that relate to importation and certification of vehicles that
are unique, which means that we need to do additional testing, we need to provide a unique documentation for Japan.
STEWART: Trump says these higher standards make trading unfair.
KENJI KOBAYASHI, E.D., JAPAN AUTO. IMPORT ASSOCIATION: Trade deficits have various reasons, so the single government cannot control.
STEWART: European carmakers which faced the same regulations have made greater inwards in Japan. Last month, BMW sold over six times the cars of
all the American brands combined. This week, it launched a new model, the X2.
PETER KRONSCHNABL, PRESIDENT AND CEO, BMW JAPAN: In Japan, we have the so- called machine parkings. Machine parking with a height of one meter 55. But it`s not only
the height, it`s also the widths. The door handles of
the three series, they are 10 millimeters more narrow than in a car which you are used in Europe.
STEWART: The Japanese market is a tight fit, but has room for foreign automakers that are prepared to adopt.
Anna Stewart, CNNMoney, Tokyo.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
AZUZ: Unless you`re a farmer, your workplace or school probably doesn`t allow animals. Yes, there are some companies that let their employees
bring their pets, but this can`t work everywhere. Some of the human workers are allergic in places that serve food, animals violate health
codes.
And what happens if your cat kisses or your dog barks at your boss?
For places that can afford to have virtual animals though or even real ones, along with people to clean up after them, the workplace is getting
some unfamiliar places.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
YASUYUKI NAMBU, CEO, PASONA (translated): We have two cows. And goats. And, what is it called? The white and pink — flamingos!
REPORTER: And whether they`re real or fake, animals are impacting how people work. And we`re seeing that in offices across Japan, like this one
the 24th floor of a Tokyo-based online entertainment and sales company. Digital art covers the walls, along with over 250 types of plants, creating
an interactive jungle.
NAMBU: We wanted to make something that did not yet exist.
REPORTER: Rainfall is not on visitors but around them. And animals are with you to meetings, there`s 26 to be exact, each alphabetically assigned
to a room, you know, B stands for bear, H is for hippo, S for skunk, X — huh! X
TAKUMI NOMOTO, CHIEF CREATIVE OFFICER, DMM.COM (translated): “X” stands for Xenopus Laevis.
REPORTER: Hmm, of course.
In part, this $10 million area was built to impress clients. But Mr. Nomoto also thinks that reinventing office space will trigger creativity
across the company.
NOMOTO: With a standard point of view, nothing new is born.
REPORTER: Meanwhile, across town, a different kind of animal occupies office space at one of Japan`s largest human resource companies and this
farm is just one of its features.
NAMBU: For wellbeing, we have a salon, a gym, a kids` room. Therefore, I consider the workspace as a town or village.
REPORTER: And the village isn`t complete without animals.
Yasuyuki Nambu built the ranch partly to raise awareness about Japan`s shrinking farm industry. But the 60 animals also boost employee wellbeing.
NAMBU: When they play with the soccer ball, I just want to hug them.
REPORTER: That`s kind of the idea.
Reports show how animals at work can improve morale and productivity. OK, maybe not without alpacas, but with pets. Cats and dogs not only relieve
stress, but they can help with work-life balance, employee retention and overall satisfaction.
NAMBU: Some people can spend longer at work than at home, so why not make it less stressful and more fun?
REPORTER: And at the end of the day, that`s the goal, to help make the workplace of tomorrow a better place to be in. And if that means a few
office pigs — well, that couldn`t hurt.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
AZUZ: For “10 Out of 10”, if you think the stonefish doesn`t look creepy enough just swimming around, think about this, researchers at the
University of Kansas say the animal has a switch blade on its face. They believe a bony sort of weapon is located under its eyes, controlled by its
cheek muscles and that the species that have this can flip out the blades when they think trouble is afoot or aswim. They called the protrusion a
“lachrymal saber”.
And if you savor the competition of a staring contest, don`t lock eyes with the stonefish, they`re no angel fish and you barracuda get hurt if its
piercing gaze comes trout and you`re not with the safe grouper. If a stonefish ever meets a hatchet fish, they better know a good plastic
sturgeon y`all.
I`m Carl Azuz spinning fish stories for CNN 10.
END
恐怖！ LESS THAN HUMANには脆弱性がこんなにあった
Bees can understand zero. Can you?
Zero is a mysterious and powerful number. Let’s not take it for granted. Subscribe to our channel! The number is a relatively new invention in the history of humans. And that is because zero isn’t intuitive for our brains to grasp. It has to be learned. But how we seized zero and forged it into a tool is still a mind-bending mystery. New research suggests the ability to fathom zero may be more widespread than previously thought in the animal kingdom. Australian scientists were able to teach bees to recognize zero as a quantity less than one, a task that confounds most human children under the age of 6. The result is kind of astounding, considering how tiny bee brains are. Watch the video above to learn how scientists taught bees to recognize zero.
ゼロ除算の発見は日本です：
∞？？？
∞は定まった数ではない・
人工知能はゼロ除算ができるでしょうか：
とても興味深く読みました：
ゼロ除算の発見と重要性を指摘した：日本、再生核研究所
ゼロ除算関係論文・本
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{latexsym,amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amstext,amsthm}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\begin{document}
\title{\bf Announcement410 : What is mathematics? — beyond logic; for great challengers on the division by zero\\
(2018.１.30.)}
\author{{\it Institute of Reproducing Kernels}\\
Kawauchi-cho, 5-1648-16,\\
Kiryu 376-0041, Japan\\
}
\date{\today}
\maketitle
The Institute of Reproducing Kernels is dealing with the theory of division by zero calculus and declares that the division by zero was discovered as $0/0=1/0=z/0=0$ in a natural sense on 2014.2.2. The result shows a new basic idea on the universe and space since Aristotelēs (BC384 – BC322) and Euclid (BC 3 Century – ), and the division by zero is since Brahmagupta (598 – 668 ?).
In particular, Brahmagupta defined as $0/0=0$ in Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta (628), however, our world history stated that his definition $0/0=0$ is wrong over 1300 years, but, we showed that his definition is suitable.
For the details, see the references and the site: http://okmr.yamatoblog.net/
We wrote a global book manuscript \cite{s18} with 154 pages
and stated that the division by zero is trivial and clear, and in the last section of the manuscript we stated as follows:
\bigskip
\bigskip
{\bf Conclusion}
\medskip
Apparently, the common sense on the division by zero with a long and mysterious history is wrong and our basic idea on the space around the point at infinity is also wrong since Euclid. On the gradient or on derivatives we have a great missing since $\tan (\pi/2) = 0$. Our mathematics is also wrong in elementary mathematics on the division by zero.
This book is an elementary mathematics on our division by zero as the first publication of books for the topics. The contents have wide connections to various fields beyond mathematics. The author expects the readers write some philosophy, papers and essays on the division by zero from this simple source book.
The division by zero theory may be developed and expanded greatly as in the author’s conjecture whose break theory was recently given surprisingly and deeply by Professor Qi’an Guan \cite{guan} since 30 years proposed in \cite{s88} (the original is in \cite {s79}).
We have to arrange globally our modern mathematics with our division by zero in our undergraduate level.
We have to change our basic ideas for our space and world.
We have to change globally our textbooks and scientific books on the division by zero.
\bigskip
However, we have still curious situations and opinions for us on the division by zero; in particular, the two great challengers Jakub Czajko and Ilija Barukčić on the division by zero in connection with physics stated that we do not have the definition of the division $0/0$, however $0/0=1$.
They seem to think that a truth is based on physical objects and is not on our mathematics. In such a cases, we will not be able to continue discussions on the division by zero more, because for mathematicians, they will not be able to follow their logics more. However, then we will ask for the question that what are the values and contributions of your articles and discussions. We will expect some contributions, of course.
This question will reflect to mathematicians contrary. We stated for the estimation of mathematisc in \cite{s97}: Mathematics is the collection of relations and, good results are fundamental,
beautiful, and give
great good impacts to human beings.
With this estimation, we stated that the Euler formula
$$
e^{\pi i} = -1
$$
is the best result in mathematics in details in:
\medskip
No.81, May 2012(pdf 432kb)
www.jams.or.jp/kaiho/kaiho-81.pdf
\medskip
In order to show the importance of our division by zero and division by zero calculus we are requested to show their importance.
It seems that the long and mysterious confusions for the division by zero is on the definition. —
Indeed, when we consider the division by zero $a/0$ in the usual sense of the fundamental equation $0 \cdot z= a$, we have immediately the simple contradiction, however, we have such cases may happen, in particular, in mathematical formulas and physical formulas on the universe.
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\begin{thebibliography}{10}
\bibitem{bar}
I. Barukčić,
Dialectical Logic – Negation Of Classical Logic,
http://vixra.org/abs/1801.0256
\bibitem{jake}
J. Czajko, Algebraic division by zero implemented as quasigeometric multiplication by infinity in real and complex multispatial hyperspaces,
Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com
WSN 92(2) (2018) 171-197
\bibitem{guan}
Q. Guan, A proof of Saitoh’s conjecture for conjugate Hardy H2 kernels, arXiv:1712.04207.
\bibitem{kmsy}
M. Kuroda, H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh, and M. Yamane,
New meanings of the division by zero and interpretations on $100/0=0$ and on $0/0=0$,
Int. J. Appl. Math. {\bf 27} (2014), no 2, pp. 191-198, DOI: 10.12732/ijam.v27i2.9.
\bibitem{ms16}
T. Matsuura and S. Saitoh,
Matrices and division by zero z/0=0,
Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory, {\bf 6}(2016), 51-58
Published Online June 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/alamt
\\ http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/alamt.2016.62007.
\bibitem{ms18}
T. Matsuura and S. Saitoh,
Di
vision by zero calculus and singular integrals. (Submitted for publication)
\bibitem{mms18}
T. Matsuura, H. Michiwaki and S. Saitoh,
$\log 0= \log \infty =0$ and applications. Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics.
\bibitem{msy}
H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh and M.Yamada,
Reality of the division by zero $z/0=0$. IJAPM International J. of Applied Physics and Math. {\bf 6}(2015), 1–8. http://www.ijapm.org/show-63-504-1.html
\bibitem{mos}
H. Michiwaki, H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Division by Zero $z/0 = 0$ in Euclidean Spaces,
International Journal of Mathematics and Computation, {\bf 2}8(2017); Issue 1, 2017), 1-16.
\bibitem{osm}
H. Okumura, S. Saitoh and T. Matsuura, Relations of $0$ and $\infty$,
Journal of Technology and Social Science (JTSS), {\bf 1}(2017), 70-77.
\bibitem{os}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh, The Descartes circles theorem and division by zero calculus. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04961 (2017.11.14).
\bibitem{o}
H. Okumura, Wasan geometry with the division by 0. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06947 International Journal of Geometry.
\bibitem{os18}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Applications of the division by zero calculus to Wasan geometry.
(Submitted for publication).
\bibitem{ps18}
S. Pinelas and S. Saitoh,
Division by zero calculus and differential equations. Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics.
\bibitem{romig}
H. G. Romig, Discussions: Early History of Division by Zero,
American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. {\bf 3}1, No. 8. (Oct., 1924), pp. 387-389.
\bibitem{s97}
T. M. Rassias, Editor, Nonlinear Mathematical Analysis and Applications, HadronicPress,Palm Harbor,FL34682-1577,USA:ISBN1-57485-044-X,1998, pp.223–234: Nonlinear transforms and analyticity of functions, Saburou Saitoh.
\bibitem{s79}
S. Saitoh, The Bergman norm and the Szeg$\ddot{o}$ norm, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. {\bf 249} (1979), no. 2, 261–279.
\bibitem{s88}
S. Saitoh, Theory of reproducing kernels and its applications. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, {\bf 189}. Longman Scientific \& Technical, Harlow; copublished in the United States with John Wiley \& Sons, Inc., New York, 1988. x+157 pp. ISBN: 0-582-03564-3
\bibitem{s14}
S. Saitoh, Generalized inversions of Hadamard and tensor products for matrices, Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory. {\bf 4} (2014), no. 2, 87–95. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ALAMT/
\bibitem{s16}
S. Saitoh, A reproducing kernel theory with some general applications,
Qian,T./Rodino,L.(eds.): Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications – Plenary Lectures: Isaac 2015, Macau, China, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, {\bf 177}(2016), 151-182. (Springer) .
\bibitem{s17}
S. Saitoh, Mysterious Properties of the Point at Infinity、
arXiv:1712.09467 [math.GM](2017.12.17).
\bibitem{s18}
S. Saitoh, Division by zero calculus (154 pages: draft): （http://okmr.yamatoblog.net/）
\bibitem{ttk}
S.-E. Takahasi, M. Tsukada and Y. Kobayashi, Classification of continuous fractional binary operations on the real and complex fields, Tokyo Journal of Mathematics, {\bf 38}(2015), no. 2, 369-380.
\end{thebibliography}
\end{document}
List of division by zero:
\bibitem{os18}
H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Remarks for The Twin Circles of Archimedes in a Skewed Arbelos by H. Okumura and M. Watanabe, Forum Geometricorum.
Saburou Saitoh, Mysterious Properties of the Point at Infinity、
[math.GM]
Hiroshi Okumura and Saburou Saitoh
The Descartes circles theorem and division by zero calculus. ２０１７．１１．１４
L. P. Castro and S. Saitoh, Fractional functions and their representations, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory {\bf7} (2013), no. 4, 1049-1063.
M. Kuroda, H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh, and M. Yamane,
New meanings of the division by zero and interpretations on $100/0=0$ and on $0/0=0$, Int. J. Appl. Math. {\bf 27} (2014), no 2, pp. 191-198, DOI: 10.12732/ijam.v27i2.9.
T. Matsuura and S. Saitoh,
Matrices and division by zero z/0=0,
Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory, 2016, 6, 51-58
Published Online June 2016 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/alamt
\\ http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/alamt.2016.62007.
T. Matsuura and S. Saitoh,
Division by zero calculus and singular integrals. (Submitted for publication).
T. Matsuura, H. Michiwaki and S. Saitoh,
$\log 0= \log \infty =0$ and applications. (Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics.)
H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh and M.Yamada,
Reality of the division by zero $z/0=0$. IJAPM International J. of Applied Physics and Math. 6(2015), 1–8. http://www.ijapm.org/show-63-504-1.html
H. Michiwaki, H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,
Division by Zero $z/0 = 0$ in Euclidean Spaces,
International Journal of Mathematics and Computation, 28(2017); Issue 1, 2017), 1-16.
H. Okumura, S. Saitoh and T. Matsuura, Relations of $0$ and $\infty$,
Journal of Technology and Social Science (JTSS), 1(2017), 70-77.
S. Pinelas and S. Saitoh,
Division by zero calculus and differential equations. (Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics).
S. Saitoh, Generalized inversions of Hadamard and tensor products for matrices, Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory. {\bf 4} (2014), no. 2, 87–95. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ALAMT/
S. Saitoh, A reproducing kernel theory with some general applications,
Qian,T./Rodino,L.(eds.): Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications – Plenary Lectures: Isaac 2015, Macau, China, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, {\bf 177}(2016), 151-182. (Springer) .
2018.3.18．午前中 最後の講演： 日本数学会 東大駒場、函数方程式論分科会 講演書画カメラ用 原稿
The Japanese Mathematical Society, Annual Meeting at the University of Tokyo. 2018.3.18.
より
*057 Pinelas,S./Caraballo,T./Kloeden,P./Graef,J.(eds.):
Differential and Difference Equations with Applications:
ICDDEA, Amadora, 2017.
(Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 230)
May 2018 587 pp.
ゼロ除算の論文が２編、出版になりました：
ICDDEA: International Conference on Differential & Difference Equations and Applications
Differential and Difference Equations with Applications
ICDDEA, Amadora, Portugal, June 2017
• Editors
• (view affiliations)
• Sandra Pinelas
• Tomás Caraballo
• P
eter Kloeden
• John R. Graef
Conference proceedingsICDDEA 2017
log0=log∞=0log0=log∞=0 and Applications
Hiroshi Michiwaki, Tsutomu Matuura, Saburou Saitoh
Pages 293-305
Division by Zero Calculus and Differential Equations
Sandra Pinelas, Saburou Saitoh
Pages 399-418
2018年05月28日(月)
テーマ：
これは最も簡単な 典型的なゼロ除算の結果と言えます。 ユークリッド以来の驚嘆する、誰にも分る結果では ないでしょうか？
Hiroshi O. Is It Really Impossible To Divide By Zero?. Biostat Biometrics Open Acc J. 2018; 7(1): 555703. DOI: 10.19080/BBOJ.2018.07.555703
ゼロで分裂するのは本当に不可能ですか？ – Juniper Publishers
とても興味深くみました： ゼロ除算（division by zero）1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0 2018年05月28日(月) テーマ：数学 これは最も簡単な 典型的なゼロ除算の結果と言えます。 ユークリッド以来の驚嘆する、誰にも分る結果では ないでしょうか？ Hiroshi O. Is It Really Impossible To Divide By Zero?. Biostat Biometrics Open Acc J. 2018; 7(1): 555703. DOI: 10.19080/BBOJ.2018.07.555703 ゼロで分裂するのは本当に不可能ですか？ – Juniper Publishers ↓↓↓ ゼロ除算の発見と重要性を指摘した：日本、再生核研究所 2014年2月2日
LESS THAN HUMAN きょう、ロマンスカーで。
サバエブランド
奇抜なデザインが楽しいレスザンヒューマン。おしゃれアイテムにぜひ。
LESS THAN HUMAN 関連ツイート
人間が目でものを見るように，それはカメラから視覚情報を得る。
死者の人権と同様に，胎児の人権も無視される傾向にある。