気になるLESS THAN HUMANをチェックしよう
しんでいた状態が、ミレニアム至福千年では復元されます。
tree, the myrtle and the oil tree; I will set in the desert the cypress tree and the pine and the box tree together, that they may see and know, and consider and understand together, that the hand of the Lord has done this, and the Holy One of Israel has created it.
LESS THAN HUMAN あなたのせいで、笑いが増える
目からレーザー照射ができるコンタクトレンズが開発される（スコットランド研究）
スコットランド、セント・アンドルーズ大学の研究者は、コンタクトレンズに貼り付けてレーザー照射ができる極薄膜を開発した。
【牛の目を使った膜のレーザーの実験】
この膜は有機半導体ポリマーから作られており、厚さ200ナノメートル(約0.0002ミリメートル)と、世界最小・最軽量のレーザーデバイスになるという。
実験は牛の目を使って行われた。膜のレーザーは強い光に反応してレーザー光を放射する。研究チームは生体に害のない光量の青い光を、牛の眼球に装着した膜のレーザーに照射したところ、レーザーはその光に反応して「緑色のレーザー光」を発射した。膜のレーザーは人間に使用しても安全だという。
「古代ギリシャのプラトンは、視覚による認識が目のビームによって行われていると考えていました。つまり目から照射されるビームによって環境が確かめられると信じていたのです」と研究チームの1人、マルタ・ギャザー氏は述べている。
「プラトンの照射説はもちろん否定されていますが、ポップカルチャーや漫画の中には目からレーザーを放つヒーローが今も生きています」
【膜レーザーの有用性】
この膜は別のレーザーで照らすことで、固有の”デジタルバーコード”を生成することができる。
悪と戦うなら、接眼レンズレーザーはそれほど実用的ではないかもしれないが、「柔軟かつウェアラブルなセキュリティタグ」として利用できるだろう。
バイオフォトニクスや光医学の分野での応用が考えられ、さらに爆発物の検出にも使用できるだろう。また紙幣に使い、偽札の流通を防止するといった使い途もある。
image credit:
さらにこの膜は爪にも流用できる。
爪に貼った実験では、指紋スキャンにも利用できた。
image credit:
世界では、企業によってスマートコンクトレンズの開発が進められている。例えば、ニューヨークを拠点に置く社は、標識を拡大したり、危険が迫った場合にそれを知らせる機能を備えた、視覚障害者向けレンズを開発している。グーグル社やサムスン社も開発競争に参加しているほか、スタートアップ企業のは通常の視野にデジタルディスプレイを組み込むレンズの実現に取り組んでいる。
この研究論文は『』に掲載された。
References: / / written by hiroching / edited by parumo
ゼロ除算の発見は日本です：
∞？？？
∞は定まった数ではない・・・・・
人工知能はゼロ除算ができるでしょうか：
とても興味深く読みました：
ゼロ除算の発見と重要性を指摘した：日本、再生核研究所
ゼロ除算関係論文・本
テーマ：
The null set is conceptually similar to the role of the number “zero” as it is used in quantum field theory. In quantum field theory, one can take the empty set, the vacuum, and generate all possible physical configurations of the Universe being modelled by acting on it with creation operators, and one can similarly change from one thing to another by applying mixtures of creation and anihillation operators to suitably filled or empty states. The anihillation operator applied to the vacuum, however, yields zero.
Zero in this case is the null set – it stands, quite literally, for no physical state in the Universe. The important point is that it is not possible to act on zero with a creation operator to create something; creation operators only act on the vacuum which is empty but not zero. Physicists are consequently fairly comfortable with the existence of operations that result in “nothing” and don’t even require that those operations be contradictions, only operationally non-invertible.
It is also far from unknown in mathematics. When considering the set of all real numbers as quantities and the operations of ordinary arithmetic, the “empty set” is algebraically the number zero (absence of any quantity, positive or negative). However, when one performs a division operation algebraically, one has to be careful to exclude division by zero from the set of permitted operations! The result of division by zero isn’t zero, it is “not a number” or “undefined” and is not in the Universe of real numbers.
Just as one can easily “prove” that 1 = 2 if one does algebra on this set of numbers as if one can divide by zero legitimately3.34, so in logic one gets into trouble if one assumes that the set of all things that are in no set including the empty set is a set within the algebra, if one tries to form the set of all sets that do not include themselves, if one asserts a Universal Set of Men exists containing a set of men wherein a male barber shaves all men that do not shave themselves3.35.
It is not – it is the null set, not the empty set, as there can be no male barbers in a non-empty set of men (containing at least one barber) that shave all men in that set that do not shave themselves at a deeper level than a mere empty list. It is not an empty set that could be filled by some algebraic operation performed on Real Male Barbers Presumed to Need Shaving in trial Universes of Unshaven Males as you can very easily see by considering any particular barber, perhaps one named “Socrates”, in any particular Universe of Men to see if any of the sets of that Universe fit this predicate criterion with Socrates as the barber. Take the empty set (no men at all). Well then there are no barbers, including Socrates, so this cannot be the set we are trying to specify as it clearly must contain at least one barber and we’ve agreed to call its relevant barber Socrates. (and if it contains more than one, the rest of them are out of work at the moment).
Suppose a trial set contains Socrates alone. In the classical rendition we ask, does he shave himself? If we answer “no”, then he is a member of this class of men who do not shave themselves and therefore must shave himself. Oops. Well, fine, he must shave himself. However, if he does shave himself, according to the rules he can only shave men who don’t shave themselves and so he doesn’t shave himself. Oops again. Paradox. When we try to apply the rule to a potential Socrates to generate the set, we get into trouble, as we cannot decide whether or not Socrates should shave himself.
Note that there is no problem at all in the existential set theory being proposed. In that set theory either Socrates must shave himself as All Men Must Be Shaven and he’s the only ma
n around. Or perhaps he has a beard, and all men do not in fact need shaving. Either way the set with just Socrates does not contain a barber that shaves all men because Socrates either shaves himself or he doesn’t, so we shrug and continue searching for a set that satisfies our description pulled from an actual Universe of males including barbers. We immediately discover that adding more men doesn’t matter. As long as those men, barbers or not, either shave themselves or Socrates shaves them they are consistent with our set description (although in many possible sets we find that hey, other barbers exist and shave other men who do not shave themselves), but in no case can Socrates (as our proposed single barber that shaves all men that do not shave themselves) be such a barber because he either shaves himself (violating the rule) or he doesn’t (violating the rule). Instead of concluding that there is a paradox, we observe that the criterion simply doesn’t describe any subset of any possible Universal Set of Men with no barbers, including the empty set with no men at all, or any subset that contains at least Socrates for any possible permutation of shaving patterns including ones that leave at least some men unshaven altogether.
I understand your note as if you are saying the limit is infinity but nothing is equal to infinity, but you concluded corretly infinity is undefined. Your example of getting the denominator smaller and smalser the result of the division is a very large number that approches infinity. This is the intuitive mathematical argument that plunged philosophy into mathematics. at that level abstraction mathematics, as well as phyisics become the realm of philosophi. The notion of infinity is more a philosopy question than it is mathamatical. The reason we cannot devide by zero is simply axiomatic as Plato pointed out. The underlying reason for the axiom is because sero is nothing and deviding something by nothing is undefined. That axiom agrees with the notion of limit infinity, i.e. undefined. There are more phiplosphy books and thoughts about infinity in philosophy books than than there are discussions on infinity in math books.
ゼロ除算の歴史：ゼロ除算はゼロで割ることを考えるであるが、アリストテレス以来問題とされ、ゼロの記録がインドで初めて６２８年になされているが、既にそのとき、正解1/0が期待されていたと言う。しかし、理論づけられず、その後１３００年を超えて、不可能である、あるいは無限、無限大、無限遠点とされてきたものである。
An Early Reference to Division by Zero C. B. Boyer
OUR HUMANITY AND DIVISION BY ZERO
Lea esta bitácora en español
There is a mathematical concept that says that division by zero has no meaning, or is an undefined expression, because it is impossible to have a real number that could be multiplied by zero in order to obtain another number different from zero.
While this mathematical concept has been held as true for centuries, when it comes to the human level the present situation in global societies has, for a very long time, been contradicting it. It is true that we don’t all live in a mathematical world or with mathematical concepts in our heads all the time. However, we cannot deny that societies around the globe are trying to disprove this simple mathematical concept: that division by zero is an impossible equation to solve.
Yes! We are all being divided by zero tolerance, zero acceptance, zero love, zero compassion, zero willingness to learn more about the other and to find intelligent and fulfilling ways to adapt to new ideas, concepts, ways of doing things, people and cultures. We are allowing these ‘zero denominators’ to run our equations, our lives, our souls.
Each and every single day we get more divided and distanced from other people who are different from us. We let misinformation and biased concepts divide us, and we buy into these aberrant concepts in such a way, that we get swept into this division by zero without checking our consciences first.
I believe, however, that if we change the zeros in any of the “divisions by zero” that are running our lives, we will actually be able to solve the non-mathematical concept of this equation: the human concept.
>I believe deep down that we all have a heart, a conscience, a brain to think with, and, above all, an immense desire to learn and evolve. And thanks to all these positive things that we do have within, I also believe that we can use them to learn how to solve our “division by zero” mathematical impossibility at the human level. I am convinced that the key is open communication and an open heart. Nothing more, nothing less.
Are we scared of, or do we feel baffled by the way another person from another culture or country looks in comparison to us? Are we bothered by how people from other cultures dress, eat, talk, walk, worship, think, etc.? Is this fear or bafflement so big that we much rather reject people and all the richness they bring within?
How about if instead of rejecting or retreating from that person—division of our humanity by zero tolerance or zero acceptance—we decided to give them and us a chance?
How about changing that zero tolerance into zero intolerance? Why not dare ask questions about the other person’s culture and way of life? Let us have the courage to let our guard down for a moment and open up enough for this person to ask us questions about our culture and way of life. How about if we learned to accept that while a person from another culture is living and breathing in our own culture, it is totally impossible for him/her to completely abandon his/her cultural values in order to become what we want her to become?
Let’s be totally honest with ourselves at least: Would any of us really renounce who we are and where we come from just to become what somebody else asks us to become?
If we are not willing to lose our identity, why should we ask somebody else to lose theirs?
I believe with all my heart that if we practiced positive feelings—zero intolerance, zero non-acceptance, zero indifference, zero cruelty—every day, the premise that states that division by zero is impossible would continue being true, not only in mathematics, but also at the human level. We would not be divided anymore; we would simply be building a better world for all of us.
Hoping to have touched your soul in a meaningful way,
Adriana Adarve, Asheville, NC
…/our-humanity-and-division…/
5000年？？？？？
2017年09月01日(金)NEW !
テーマ：数学
Former algebraic approach was formally perfect, but it merely postulated existence of sets and morphisms [18] without showing methods to construct them. The primary concern of modern algebras is not how an operation can be performed, but whether it maps into or onto and the like abstract issues [19–23]. As important as this may be for proofs, the nature does not really care about all that. The PM’s concerns were not constructive, even though theoretically significant. We need thus an approach that is more relevant to operations performed in nature, which never complained about morphisms or the allegedly impossible division by zero, as far as I can tell. Abstract sets and morphisms should be de-emphasized as hardly operational. My decision to come up with a definite way to implement the feared division by zero was not really arbitrary, however. It has removed a hidden paradox from number theory and an obvious absurd from algebraic group theory. It was necessary step for full deployment of constructive, synthetic mathematics (SM) [2,3]. Problems hidden in PM implicitly affect all who use mathematics, even though we may not always be aware of their adverse impact on our thinking. Just take a look at the paradox that emerges from the usual prescription for multiplication of zeros that remained uncontested for some 5
000 years 0 0 ¼ 0 ) 0 1=1 ¼ 0 ) 0 1 ¼ 0 1) 1ð? ¼ ?Þ1 ð0aÞ This ‘‘fact’’ was covered up by the infamous prohibition on division by zero [2]. How ingenious. If one is prohibited from dividing by zero one could not obtain this paradox. Yet the prohibition did not really make anything right. It silenced objections to irresponsible reasonings and prevented corrections to the PM’s flamboyant axiomatizations. The prohibition on treating infinity as invertible counterpart to zero did not do any good either. We use infinity in calculus for symbolic calculations of limits [24], for zero is the infinity’s twin [25], and also in projective geometry as well as in geometric mapping of complex numbers. Therein a sphere is cast onto the plane that is tangent to it and its free (opposite) pole in a point at infinity [26–28]. Yet infinity as an inverse to the natural zero removes the whole absurd (0a), for we obtain [2] 0 ¼ 1=1 ) 0 0 ¼ 1=12 > 0 0 ð0bÞ Stereographic projection of complex numbers tacitly contradicted the PM’s prescribed way to multiply zeros, yet it was never openly challenged. The old formula for multiplication of zeros (0a) is valid only as a practical approximation, but it is group-theoretically inadmissible in no-nonsense reasonings. The tiny distinction in formula (0b) makes profound theoretical difference for geometries and consequently also for physical applications. T
とても興味深く読みました：
10,000 Year Clock
by Renny Pritikin
Conversation with Paolo Salvagione, lead engineer on the 10,000-year clock project, via e-mail in February 2010.
For an introduction to what we’re talking about here’s a short excerpt from a piece by Michael Chabon, published in 2006 in Details: ….Have you heard of this thing? It is going to be a kind of gigantic mechanical computer, slow, simple and ingenious, marking the hour, the day, the year, the century, the millennium, and the precession of the equinoxes, with a huge orrery to keep track of the immense ticking of the six naked-eye planets on their great orbital mainspring. The Clock of the Long Now will stand sixty feet tall, cost tens of millions of dollars, and when completed its designers and supporters plan to hide it in a cave in the Great Basin National Park in Nevada, a day’s hard walking from anywhere. Oh, and it’s going to run for ten thousand years. But even if the Clock of the Long Now fails to last ten thousand years, even if it breaks down after half or a quarter or a tenth that span, this mad contraption will already have long since fulfilled its purpose. Indeed the Clock may have accomplished its greatest task before it is ever finished, perhaps without ever being built at all. The point of the Clock of the Long Now is not to measure out the passage, into their unknown future, of the race of creatures that built it. The point of the Clock is to revive and restore the whole idea of the Future, to get us thinking about the Future again, to the degree if not in quite the way same way that we used to do, and to reintroduce the notion that we don’t just bequeath the future—though we do, whether we think about it or not. We also, in the very broadest sense of the first person plural pronoun, inherit it.
Renny Pritikin: When we were talking the other day I said that this sounds like a cross between Borges and the vast underground special effects from Forbidden Planet. I imagine you hear lots of comparisons like that…
Paolo Salvagione: (laughs) I can’t say I’ve heard that comparison. A childhood friend once referred to the project as a cross between Tinguely and Fabergé. When talking about the clock, with people, there’s that divide-by-zero moment (in the early days of computers to divide by zero was a sure way to crash the computer) and I can understand why. Where does one place, in one’s memory, such a thing, such a concept? After the pause, one could liken it to a reboot, the questions just start streaming out.
RP: OK so I think the word for that is nonplussed. Which the thesaurus matches with flummoxed, bewildered, at a loss. So the question is why even (I assume) fairly sophisticated people like your friends react like that. Is it the physical scale of the plan, or the notion of thinking 10,000 years into the future—more than the length of human history?
PS: I’d say it’s all three and more. I continue to be amazed by the specificity of the questions asked. Anthropologists ask a completely different set of questions than say, a mechanical engineer or a hedge fund manager. Our disciplines tie us to our perspectives. More than once, a seemingly innocent question has made an impact on the design of the clock. It’s not that we didn’t know the answer, sometimes we did, it’s that we hadn’t thought about it from the perspective of the person asking the question. Back to your question. I think when sophisticated people, like you, thread this concept through their own personal narrative it tickles them. Keeping in mind some people hate to be tickled.
RP: Can you give an example of a question that redirected the plan? That’s really so interesting, that all you brainiacs slaving away on this project and some amateur blithely pinpoints a problem or inconsistency or insight that spins it off in a different direction. It’s like the butterfly effect.
PS: Recently a climatologist pointed out that our equation of time cam, (photo by Rolfe Horn) (a cam is a type of gear: link) a device that tracks the difference between solar noon and mundane noon as well as the precession of the equinoxes, did not account for the redistribution of water away from the earth’s poles. The equation-of-time cam is arguably one of the most aesthetically pleasing parts of the clock. It also happens to be one that is fairly easy to explain. It visually demonstrates two extremes. If you slice it, like a loaf of bread, into 10,000 slices each slice would represent a year. The outside edge of the slice, let’s call it the crust, represents any point in that year, 365 points, 365 days. You could, given the right amount of magnification, divide it into hours, minutes, even seconds. Stepping back and looking at the unsliced cam the bottom is the year 2000 and the top is the year 12000. The twist that you see is the precession of the equinoxes. Now here’s the fun part, there’s a slight taper to the twist, that’s the slowing of the earth on its axis. As the ice at the poles melts we have a redistribution of water, we’re all becoming part of the “slow earth” movement.
RP: Are you familiar with Charles Ray’s early work in which you saw a plate on a table, or an object on the wall, and they looked stable, but were actually spinning incredibly slowly, or incredibly fast, and you couldn’t tell in either case? Or, more to the point, Tim Hawkinson’s early works in which he had rows of clockwork gears that turned very very fast, and then down the line, slower and slower, until at the end it approached the slowness that you’re dealing with?
PS: The spinning pieces by Ray touches on something we’re trying to avoid. We want you to know just how fast or just how slow the various parts are moving. The beauty of the Ray piece is that you can’t tell, fast, slow, stationary, they all look the same. I’m not familiar with the Hawkinson clockwork piece. I’ve see the clock pieces where he hides the mechanism and uses unlikely objects as the hands, such as the brass clasp on the back of a manila envelope or the tab of a coke can.
RP: Spin Sink (1 Rev./100 Years) (1995), in contrast, is a 24-foot-long row of interlocking gears, the smallest of which is driven by a whirring toy motor that in turn drives each consecutively larger and more slowly turning gear up to the largest of all, which rotates approximately once every one hundred years.
PS: I don’t know how I missed it, it’s gorgeous. Linking the speed that we can barely see with one that we rarely have the patience to wait for.
RP: : So you say y
ou’ve opted for the clock’s time scale to be transparent. How will the clock communicate how fast it’s going?
PS: By placing the clock in a mountain we have a reference to long time. The stratigraphy provides us with the slowest metric. The clock is a middle point between millennia and seconds. Looking back 10,000 years we find the beginnings of civilization. Looking at an earthenware vessel from that era we imagine its use, the contents, the craftsman. The images painted or inscribed on the outside provide some insight into the lives and the languages of the distant past. Often these interpretations are flawed, biased or over-reaching. What I’m most enchanted by is that we continue to construct possible pasts around these objects, that our curiosity is overwhelming. We line up to see the treasures of Tut, or the remains of frozen ancestors. With the clock we are asking you to create possible futures, long futures, and with them the narratives that made them happen.
ダ・ヴィンチの名言 格言｜無こそ最も素晴らしい存在
ゼロ除算の発見はどうでしょうか：
Black holes are where God divided by zero：
再生核研究所声明371（2017.6.27）ゼロ除算の講演― 国際会議
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0
ソクラテス・プラトン・アリストテレス その他
ドキュメンタリー 2017: 神の数式 第２回 宇宙はなぜ生まれたのか
〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式 完全版 第3回 宇宙はなぜ始まったのか
&t=3318s
〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式 完全版 第1回 この世は何からできているのか
NHKスペシャル 神の数式 完全版 第4回 異次元宇宙は存在するか
再生核研究所声明 411(2018.02.02): ゼロ除算発見4周年を迎えて
再生核研究所声明 416(2018.2.20): ゼロ除算をやってどういう意味が有りますか。何か意味が有りますか。何になるのですか － 回答
再生核研究所声明 417(2018.2.23): ゼロ除算って何ですか － 中学生、高校生向き 回答
再生核研究所声明 418(2018.2.24): 割り算とは何ですか？ ゼロ除算って何ですか － 小学生、中学生向き 回答
再生核研究所声明 420(2018.3.2): ゼロ除算は正しいですか，合っていますか、信用できますか － 回答
2018.3.18．午前中 最後の講演： 日本数学会 東大駒場、函数方程式論分科会 講演書画カメラ用 原稿
The Japanese Mathematical Society, Annual Meeting at the University of Tokyo. 2018.3.18.
より
*057 Pinelas,S./Caraballo,T./Kloeden,P./Graef,J.(eds.): Differential and Difference Equations with Applications: ICDDEA, Amadora, 2017. (Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 230) May 2018 587 pp.
再生核研究所声明 424(2018.3.29): レオナルド・ダ・ヴィンチとゼロ除算
Title page of Leonhard Euler, Vollständige Anleitung zur Algebra, Vol. 1 (edition of 1771, first published in 1770), and p. 34 from Article 83, where Euler explains why a number divided by zero gives infinity.
私は数学を信じない。 アルバート・アインシュタイン / I don’t believe in mathematics. Albert Einstein→ゼロ除算ができなかったからではないでしょうか。
1423793753.460.341866474681。
Einstein’s Only Mistake: Division by Zero
ゼロ除算は定義が問題です：
再生核研究所声明 １４８（2014.2.12） 100/0=0, 0/0=0 － 割り算の考えを自然に拡張すると ― 神の意志
再生核研究所声明１７１（2014.7.30）掛け算の意味と割り算の意味 ― ゼロ除算100/0=0は自明である？
Title page of Leonhard Euler, Vollständige Anleitung zur Algebra, Vol. 1 (edition of 1771, first published in 1770), and p. 34 from Article 83, where Euler explains why a number divided by zero gives infinity.
私は数学を信じない。 アルバート・アインシュタイン / I don’t believe in mathematics. Albert Einstein→ゼロ除算ができなかったからではないでしょうか。1423793753.460.341866474681。
Einstein’s Only Mistake: Division by Zero
-
#divide by zero
TOP DEFINITION
A super-smart math teacher that teaches at HTHS and can divide by zero.
Hey look, that genius’s IQ is over 9000!
by October 21, 2009
-
-
再生核研究所声明 427(2018.5.8): 神の数式、神の意志 そしてゼロ除算
LESS THAN HUMAN 自然のチカラを、未来のチカラへ
NEW QUESTION: 1
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each
question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question
sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these
questions will not appear in the review screen.
You deploy the first primary site server to your organization. Discovery is not configured.
You need to deploy the Configuration Manager client to five client computers in a workgroup.
Solution: You manually install the client on the computers.
Does this meet the goal?
A. Yes
B. No
Answer: A
Explanation:
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/clients/deploy/deploy-clients-to-windows-computers
NEW QUESTION: 2
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each
question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question
sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these
questions will not appear in the review screen.
You deploy the first primary site server to your organization. Discovery is not configured.
You need to deploy the Configuration Manager client to five client computers in a workgroup.
Solution: You deploy the client by using a software deployment.
Does this meet the goal?
A. Yes
B. No
Answer: B
Explanation:
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sccm/core/clients/deploy/deploy-clients-to-windows-computers
NEW QUESTION: 3
HOT SPOT
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that use the same scenario. For your convenience,
the scenario is repeated in each question. Each question presents a different goal and answer
choices, but the text of the scenario is exactly the same in each question in this series.
Start of repeated scenario.
Your network contains an Active directory forest named adatum.com.
All client computers run Windows 10 Enterprise. All the computers are named by using the name of
their respective department and an incremental three-digit number. For example, the first computer
in the sales department is named Sales001.
Several managers use tablets that run Windows 10 and have 3 GB of RAM. All other client computers
have at least 8 GB RAM.
Adatum.com is synchronized to Microsoft Azure Active Directory.
Your company implements the Microsoft Store for Business.
You have a deployment of System Center Configuration Manager (Current Branch) that has discovery
configured. All the client computers have the Configuration Manager client installed.
The company uses the applications shown in the following table.
The company identifies the following requirements for software deployments:
View the Upgrade Readiness data of all the client computers.
Deploy App1 to the client computers in the marketing department.
Deploy App2 to the client computers in the human resources (HR) department.
Monitor the usage of App3.
Deploy SalesAppLite to sales department computers that have 3 GB of RAM or less.
Deploy SalesAppFull to sales department computers that have more than 3 GB of RAM.
You create a cloud-based distribution point that has a public name of d1594d4527614a09b934d470.
End of repeated scenario.
The company creates a new department named research.
You need to deploy App2 and App3 to the client computers in the research department.
How should you configure the membership rule for the Research collection? To answer, select the
appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Answer:
Explanation:
References:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh967533.aspx
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg712323.aspx
NEW QUESTION: 4
You have a device collection named Collection1.
Currently, you use an automated deployment rule (ADR) to deploy updates as quickly as possible to
Collection1.
You need to ensure that the updates are installed during a predefined period of time.
The solution must affect the updates only.
What should you do?
A. From the Maintenance Windows tab of Collection1, create a new schedule that applies to
software updates only.
B. From the Membership Rules tab of Collection1, schedule a full update of the collection.
C. From the Maintenance Windows tab of Collection1, create a new schedule that applies to all
deployments.
D. From the Membership Rules tab of Collection1, schedule an incremental update of the collection.
Answer: A
Explanation:
References:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh508762.aspx
今の社会はますます激しく変化しているから、私たちはいつまでも危機意識を強化します。キャンパース内のIT知識を学ぶ学生なり、IT職人なり、70-703 トレーリングサンプル試験資格認証証明書を取得して、社会需要に応じて自分の能力を高めます。我々社は最高のMicrosoft 試験問題集を開発し提供して、一番なさービスを与えて努力しています。業界で有名なMicrosoft 問題集販売会社として、購入意向があると、我々の商品を選んでくださいませんか。
君はまだMicrosoftの70-744 テスト参考書認証試験を通じての大きい難度が悩んでいますか？ 君はまだMicrosoft 70-744 テスト参考書認証試験に合格するために寝食を忘れて頑張って復習しますか？ 早くてMicrosoft 70-744 テスト参考書認証試験を通りたいですか？Pass4Testを選択しましょう！Pass4TestはきみのIT夢に向かって力になりますよ。Pass4Testは多種なIT認証試験を受ける方を正確な資料を提供者でございます。弊社の無料なサンプルを遠慮なくダウンロードしてください。
試験番号：70-703
試験科目：「Administering Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager and Cloud Services Integration」
一年間無料で問題集をアップデートするサービスを提供いたします
最近更新時間：2018-08-30
問題と解答：全70問 70-703 トレーリングサンプル
試験番号：70-744
試験科目：「Securing Windows Server 2016」
一年間無料で問題集をアップデートするサービスを提供いたします
最近更新時間：2018-08-30
問題と解答：全155問 70-744 テスト参考書
IT業界を愛しているあなたは重要なMicrosoftの70-703 トレーリングサンプル試験のために準備していますか。我々Pass4Testにあなたを助けさせてください。我々はあなたのMicrosoftの70-703 トレーリングサンプル試験への成功を確保しているだけでなく、楽な準備過程と行き届いたアフターサービスを承諾しています。
購入前にお試し,私たちの試験の質問と回答のいずれかの無料サンプルをダウンロード：
LESS THAN HUMAN、支払の自由
The following is an article published on 2 page of the Sankei Shimbun this morning.
This article suggests that the Asahi Shimbun Company is a villainous company,
That aspect is an unscrupulous company equal to or less than the lowest criminals as people living on the net …
It clearly shows that it is a group of the lowest human beings to discard as human beings.
It is an article that appears evidently as if their articles are hypocritical, which righteousness and assertions that they have talked in paper in a style as if they are democratic guardian deity.
It is also an article proving that the Asahi Shimbun who praised China and the Korean Peninsula continues to write their representative writings because they are also homogenous with them.
Asahi, Japanese version also avoided search
Asahi Shimbun is sophistry as ‘operation erroneous’ after release.
Comfort women net articles
It is a problem that two English articles concerning the comfort women issue of the website ‘Asahi Shimbun Digital’ were set to be unable to search the Internet, it is a problem that was set to be unable to search the internet, even one Japanese article of the same content, ‘Meta tag’ was embedded to prevent users from visiting a specific web page was found.
Although this article was a searchable setting at the time of publication, metatags were embedded later.
Asahi Shimbun Public Relations Division stated, ‘When we got an interview with the Sankei Shimbun on the English version of the tag on August 23, we also checked the Japanese version of the article, at that time the operation of the delivery system was wrong, it turned out that it was changed.’
The meta tag has already been deleted and it is said to be searchable.
The new meta tag was found in the morning edition of the morning edition of August 5, 2014, ‘Thinking about the comfort women issue, the upper part’, published in the Asahi Shimbun Digital on the same day ‘The Volunteer Corps’ Confusion … At the time research was poor and identical’, article.
In the past article, comfort women are said to be, it was mobilized to the front line in the name of ‘girls volunteer party’, about the part that after explained, after making ‘completely different’
Then, it misused by the confusing of a volunteer corps was regarded as being a comfort woman in the material that the research about the comfort woman problem was not moving ahead and that the reporter consulted and so on, too.
According to the confirmation by the service that automatically saves past websites, the search avoidance meta tag did not exist until September 10 last year.
Also, this article was set to be discontinued on April 30, 2019 at 16: 23.
Asahi Shimbun Public Relations Department said, ‘Asahi Digital’s majority of articles will not be released after a certain period.’ The comfort women issue article is Considered to be necessary for long-term disclosure, and in April 2016 the expiration date is set as a temporary setting in 2019’ they explained it.
AJCN representative Mr. Yamaoka Tetsuhide found that the meta tag was embedded in a series of articles.
While conducting an activity seeking to rectify comfort women-related English articles with California lawyer Kent Gilbert and others, he noticed the existence of setting to avoid searching.
Meta tag is a keyword that provides web page information to Google and other search engines.
It makes it difficult to search, and conversely makes it easy to search.
Usually it is not displayed on the web page and cannot be rewritten by a third party.
Three meta tags of ‘noindex’, ‘nofollow’ and ‘noarchive’ were embedded in all the articles in question and it was not possible to search.
Meta tag … Information for specifying the language and characters to use when displaying the document on a web page. Descriptions of the content of the document and keywords are also described. Normally it is not displayed on the screen of a personal computer or the like, but the search engine decides the search ranking with reference to this information.
欲しい商品とクチコミのLESS THAN HUMAN通販サイト
ドナルド・Jトランプ大統領は、オピオイドに関する作業を含むNIHの研究イニシアチブについて議論するために、オーバル事務所のアレックス・アザー（Alex Azar）保健福祉長官と国立衛生研究所（NIH）のフランシス・コリンズ所長を会見している。
これらの神聖な畑に眠っている英雄たち
トリンプ大統領は、昨日、メモリアルデーを記念し、アメリカを守る人生に敬意を表するため、バージニア州アーリントン国立墓地を訪れました。 「これらの神聖な畑（墓地、戦場、埋葬地など）に眠っている英雄たちは、アメリカ人の生き方から抜け出せない。
記念日は、私たちの国のために究極の犠牲を捧げた人々を称える機会です。それらの戦士たちを覚えているので、ベテランを含むユニフォームでアメリカの英雄全員の人生をより良くする方法を検討する瞬間でもあります。
近い将来、トランプ大統領は、米国がベテラン人口をどのように扱っているかを修正するための重要な一歩を踏み出すでしょう。彼は、退役軍人局（VA）をVA計画の核心に置くことによって、21世紀の高性能かつ総合的な医療制度に変えるVA MISSION法に署名します。
トランプ大統領の記念日メッセージを見てください。
More：このメモリアルデー、アメリカの退役軍人のための勝利
納税者、組合、連邦労働者
連邦政府機関は組合交渉担当者の給料を支払うため、交渉が数年続くと納税者を傷つける。組合交渉担当者の給料は、2016年だけで1600万ドルに達した。退役軍人の職員は470人以上で、74人の常勤看護師を含む退役軍人に勤務する代わりに、労働組合の勤務時間の100％を費やしています。
トランプ大統領からの新たなエグゼクティブ・オーダーは、代理店に対し、より効率的かつ透明性の高い労働組合契約の交渉を要求します。それは、1年未満で労働協約を締結するように政府機関に奨励することによって、長年の高価な引き出し交渉を排除する。さらに、労働組合に代わって行動する権限を与えられた連邦政府の従業員は、労働時間の25％を労働組合に費やすことは許されません。
納税者を優先するトランプの公務員改革に関する詳細をご覧ください。
その日の写真
アンドレア・ハンクスの公式ホワイトハウス写真
ドナルド・J・トランプ大統領が記念日に記念式典に参加| 2018年5月28日
プライバシーポリシー|ホワイトハウスに連絡する|退会する
●こちらは、多くの外国人が被害者です。あなたも #MeToo < /font> 被害者です。
【ＵＳＡ Mail magazine from the White House 2018-05-30a 】
|
|
|
● Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a #MeToo victim too.
LESS THAN HUMAN 関連ツイート
死者の人権と同様に，胎児の人権も無視される傾向にある。
人間が目でものを見るように，それはカメラから視覚情報を得る。