皆様こんにちは！

 

今日のブログタイトル「人間以下」

 

ぎょっ！とするタイトルですが、これなブランドネームなんです。

 

そう、人気ブランド、『Less than human』の意味です。

 

ニューモデルが入荷しました。

 

Less than human　　　　　RECALL

 

カッコイイですよ！

 

流行りのカールトンタイプのデザインですが、

 

ブラック＆ゴールドの2トーンで、ゴールドの部分はメッシュ加工が施されています。

 

このあたり鯖江の技術を感じさせます。

 

テンプルイはブラウン系のプラスチック製です。

 

ぜひ実際に掛けていただきたい硬派なメガネです♫

 

 

 

(株)アイスタイル　メガネの正視堂

〒917-0077
福井県小浜市駅前町5-21 
電話 0770-53-0878 

営業時間 
平日・日祭日　 　9時00分～19時00分
定休日 　　　　　　無し

駐車場　　　　　　当店の3軒隣りにあります、「駅りパーキング」をご利用下さい。

　　　　　　　　　　　無料券をお渡しします。

 

NEWTON, DARWIN, HAWKING

Geplaatst op 29 maart 2018 door Redactie

 

De as van de wereldberoemde Britse wetenschapper Stephen Hawking wordt bijgezet in de Westminster Abbey in Londen.

Zijn resten komen zo vlak bij die van Isaac Newton en Charles Darwin te liggen. Dat meldt de BBC.

In Westminster Abbey liggen met Newton en Darwin een aantal van de grootste Britse wetenschappers begraven. Newton ontdekte de zwaartekracht en Darwin bedacht de evolutietheorie. De laatste keer dat er een wetenschapper werd bijgezet in de kerk was in 1940. Het ging toen om Joseph John Thompson, de ontdekker van elektronen.

Westminster Abbey was van de zestiende tot de negentiende eeuw een van de belangrijkste wetenschapscentra in het land. De kerk heeft ook een koninklijke status. Sinds 1066 worden de Engelse koningen daar gekroond en die trouwen er doorgaans ook. In mei trouwen Prins Harry en zijn verloofde Meghan Markle ook in de kerk.

De uitvaartplechtigheid van Stephen Hawking vindt zaterdag 31 maart 2018 in besloten kring plaatst in een kerk van de universiteit van Cambridge. De natuurkundige woonde en werkte meer dan vijftig jaar lang in de Engelse stad. Professor Hawking overleed 14 maart op 76-jarige leeftijd.

Bron: 

Bericht geplaatst in: 

 

ゼロ除算の発見は日本です：

 

2017年11月15日(水)
テーマ：

The null set is conceptually similar to the role of the number “zero” as it is used in quantum field theory. In quantum field theory, one can take the empty set, the vacuum, and generate all possible physical configurations of the Universe being modelled by acting on it with creation operators, and one can similarly change from one thing to another by applying mixtures of creation and anihillation operators to suitably filled or empty states. The anihillation operator applied to the vacuum, however, yields zero.

Zero in this case is the null set – it stands, quite literally, for no physical state in the Universe. The important point is that it is not possible to act on zero with a creation operator to create something; creation operators only act on the vacuum which is empty but not zero. Physicists are consequently fairly comfortable with the existence of operations that result in “nothing” and don’t even require that those operations be contradictions, only operationally non-invertible.

It is also far from unknown in mathematics. When considering the set of all real numbers as quantities and the operations of ordinary arithmetic, the “empty set” is algebraically the number zero (absence of any quantity, positive or negative). However, when one performs a division operation algebraically, one has to be careful to exclude division by zero from the set of permitted operations! The result of division by zero isn’t zero, it is “not a number” or “undefined” and is not in the Universe of real numbers.

Just as one can easily “prove” that 1 = 2 if one does algebra on this set of numbers as if one can divide by zero legitimately3.34, so in logic one gets into trouble if one assumes that the set of all things that are in no set including the empty set is a set within the algebra, if one tries to form the set of all sets that do not include themselves, if one asserts a Universal Set of Men exists containing a set of men wherein a male barber shaves all men that do not shave themselves3.35.

It is not – it is the null set, not the empty set, as there can be no male barbers in a non-empty set of men (containing at least one barber) that shave all men in that set that do not shave themselves at a deeper level than a mere empty list. It is not an empty set that could be filled by some algebraic operation performed on Real Male Barbers Presumed to Need Shaving in trial Universes of Unshaven Males as you can very easily see by considering any particular barber, perhaps one named “Socrates”, in any particular Universe of Men to see if any of the sets of that Universe fit this predicate criterion with Socrates as the barber. Take the empty set (no men at all). Well then there are no barbers, including Socrates, so this cannot be the set we are trying to specify as it clearly must contain at least one barber and we’ve agreed to call its relevant barber Socrates. (and if it contains more than one, the rest of them are out of work at the moment).

Suppose a trial set contains Socrates alone. In the classical rendition we ask, does he shave himself? If we answer “no”, then he is a member of this class of men who do not shave themselves and therefore must shave himself. Oops. Well, fine, he must shave himself. However, if he does shave himself, according to the rules he can only shave men who don’t shave themselves and so he doesn’t shave himself. Oops again. Paradox. When we try to apply the rule to a potential Socrates to generate the set, we get into trouble, as we cannot decide whether or not Socrates should shave himself.

Note that there is no problem at all in the existential set theory being proposed. In that set theory either Socrates must shave himself as All Men Must Be Shaven and he’s the only man around. Or perhaps he has a beard, and all men do not in fact need shaving. Either way the set with just Socrates does not contain a barber that shaves all men because Socrates either shaves himself or he doesn’t, so we shrug and continue searching for a set that satisfies our description pulled from an actual Universe of males including barbers. We immediately discover that adding more men doesn’t matter. As long as those men, barbers or not, either shave themselves or Socrates shaves them they are consistent with our set description (although in many possible sets we find that hey, other barbers exist and shave other men who do not shave themselves), but in no case can Socrates (as our proposed single barber that shaves all men that do not shave themselves) be such a barber because he either shaves himself (violating the rule) or he doesn’t (violating the rule). Instead of concluding that there is a paradox, we observe that the criterion simply doesn’t describe any subset of any possible Universal Set of Men with no barbers, including the empty set with no men at all, or any subset that contains at least Socrates for any possible permutation of shaving patterns including ones that leave at least some men unshaven altogether.

 

 I understand your note as if you are saying the limit is infinity but nothing is equal to infinity, but you concluded corretly infinity is undefined. Your example of getting the denominator smaller and smalser the result of the division is a very large number that approches infinity. This is the intuitive mathematical argument that plunged philosophy into mathematics. at that level abstraction mathematics, as well as phyisics become the realm of philosophi. The notion of infinity is more a philosopy question than it is mathamatical. The reason we cannot devide by zero is simply axiomatic as Plato pointed out. The underlying reason for the axiom is because sero is nothing and deviding something by nothing is undefined. That axiom agrees with the notion of limit infinity, i.e. undefined. There are more phiplosphy books and thoughts about infinity in philosophy books than than there are discussions on infinity in math books.

 

 

ゼロ除算の歴史：ゼロ除算はゼロで割ることを考えるであるが、アリストテレス以来問題とされ、ゼロの記録がインドで初めて６２８年になされているが、既にそのとき、正解1/0が期待されていたと言う。しかし、理論づけられず、その後１３００年を超えて、不可能である、あるいは無限、無限大、無限遠点とされてきたものである。

An Early Reference to Division by Zero C. B. Boyer

 

OUR HUMANITY AND DIVISION BY ZERO

Lea esta bitácora en español
There is a mathematical concept that says that division by zero has no meaning, or is an undefined expression, because it is impossible to have a real number that could be multiplied by zero in order to obtain another number different from zero.
While this mathematical concept has been held as true for centuries, when it comes to the human level the present situation in global societies has, for a very long time, been contradicting it. It is true that we don’t all live in a mathematical world or with mathematical concepts in our heads all the time. However, we cannot deny that societies around the globe are trying to disprove this simple mathematical concept: that division by zero is an impossible equation to solve.
Yes! We are all being divided by zero tolerance, zero acceptance, zero love, zero compassion, zero willingness to learn more about the other and to find intelligent and fulfilling ways to adapt to new ideas, concepts, ways of doing things, people and cultures. We are allowing these ‘zero denominators’ to run our equations, our lives, our souls.
Each and every single day we get more divided and distanced from other people who are different from us. We let misinformation and biased concepts divide us, and we buy into these aberrant concepts in such a way, that we get swept into this division by zero without checking our consciences first.
I believe, however, that if we change the zeros in any of the “divisions by zero” that are running our lives, we will actually be able to solve the non-mathematical concept of this equation: the human concept.
>I believe deep down that we all have a heart, a conscience, a brain to think with, and, above all, an immense desire to learn and evolve. And thanks to all these positive things that we do have within, I also believe that we can use them to learn how to solve our “division by zero” mathematical impossibility at the human level. I am convinced that the key is open communication and an open heart. Nothing more, nothing less.
Are we scared of, or do we feel baffled by the way another person from another culture or country looks in comparison to us? Are we bothered by how people from other cultures dress, eat, talk, walk, worship, think, etc.? Is this fear or bafflement so big that we much rather reject people and all the richness they bring within?
How about if instead of rejecting or retreating from that person—division of our humanity by zero tolerance or zero acceptance—we decided to give them and us a chance?
How about changing that zero tolerance into zero intolerance? Why not dare ask questions about the other person’s culture and way of life? Let us have the courage to let our guard down for a moment and open up enough for this person to ask us questions about our culture and way of life. How about if we learned to accept that while a person from another culture is living and breathing in our own culture, it is totally impossible for him/her to completely abandon his/her cultural values in order to become what we want her to become?
Let’s be totally honest with ourselves at least: Would any of us really renounce who we are and where we come from just to become what somebody else asks us to become?
If we are not willing to lose our identity, why should we ask somebody else to lose theirs?
I believe with all my heart that if we practiced positive feelings—zero intolerance, zero non-acceptance, zero indifference, zero cruelty—every day, the premise that states that division by zero is impossible would continue being true, not only in mathematics, but also at the human level. We would not be divided anymore; we would simply be building a better world for all of us.
Hoping to have touched your soul in a meaningful way,
Adriana Adarve, Asheville, NC
…/our-humanity-and-division…/

 

5000年？？？？？

2017年09月01日(金)NEW ! 
テーマ：数学
Former algebraic approach was formally perfect, but it merely postulated existence of sets and morphisms [18] without showing methods to construct them. The primary concern of modern algebras is not how an operation can be performed, but whether it maps into or onto and the like abstract issues [19–23]. As important as this may be for proofs, the nature does not really care about all that. The PM’s concerns were not constructive, even though theoretically significant. We need thus an approach that is more relevant to operations performed in nature, which never complained about morphisms or the allegedly impossible division by zero, as far as I can tell. Abstract sets and morphisms should be de-emphasized as hardly operational. My decision to come up with a definite way to implement the feared division by zero was not really arbitrary, however. It has removed a hidden paradox from number theory and an obvious absurd from algebraic group theory. It was necessary step for full deployment of constructive, synthetic mathematics (SM) [2,3]. Problems hidden in PM implicitly affect all who use mathematics, even though we may not always be aware of their adverse impact on our thinking. Just take a look at the paradox that emerges from the usual prescription for multiplication of zeros that remained uncontested for some 5000 years 0
0 ¼ 0 ) 0
1=1 ¼ 0 ) 0
1 ¼ 0
1) 1ð? ¼ ?Þ1 ð0aÞ This ‘‘fact’’ was covered up by the infamous prohibition on division by zero [2]. How ingenious. If one is prohibited from dividing by zero one could not obtain this paradox. Yet the prohibition did not really make anything right. It silenced objections to irresponsible reasonings and prevented corrections to the PM’s flamboyant axiomatizations. The prohibition on treating infinity as invertible counterpart to zero did not do any good either. We use infinity in calculus for symbolic calculations of limits [24], for zero is the infinity’s twin [25], and also in projective geometry as well as in geometric mapping of complex numbers. Therein a sphere is cast onto the plane that is tangent to it and its free (opposite) pole in a point at infinity [26–28]. Yet infinity as an inverse to the natural zero removes the whole absurd (0a), for we obtain [2] 0 ¼ 1=1 ) 0
0 ¼ 1=12 > 0 0 ð0bÞ Stereographic projection of complex numbers tacitly contradicted the PM’s prescribed way to multiply zeros, yet it was never openly challenged. The old formula for multiplication of zeros (0a) is valid only as a practical approximation, but it is group-theoretically inadmissible in no-nonsense reasonings. The tiny distinction in formula (0b) makes profound theoretical difference for geometries and consequently also for physical applications. T

とても興味深く読みました：

 

 

10,000 Year Clock
by Renny Pritikin
Conversation with Paolo Salvagione, lead engineer on the 10,000-year clock project, via e-mail in February 2010.

For an introduction to what we’re talking about here’s a short excerpt from a piece by Michael Chabon, published in 2006 in Details: ….Have you heard of this thing? It is going to be a kind of gigantic mechanical computer, slow, simple and ingenious, marking the hour, the day, the year, the century, the millennium, and the precession of the equinoxes, with a huge orrery to keep track of the immense ticking of the six naked-eye planets on their great orbital mainspring. The Clock of the Long Now will stand sixty feet tall, cost tens of millions of dollars, and when completed its designers and supporters plan to hide it in a cave in the Great Basin National Park in Nevada, a day’s hard walking from anywhere. Oh, and it’s going to run for ten thousand years. But even if the Clock of the Long Now fails to last ten thousand years, even if it breaks down after half or a quarter or a tenth that span, t
his mad contraption will already have long since fulfilled its purpose. Indeed the Clock may have accomplished its greatest task before it is ever finished, perhaps without ever being built at all. The point of the Clock of the Long Now is not to measure out the passage, into their unknown future, of the race of creatures that built it. The point of the Clock is to revive and restore the whole idea of the Future, to get us thinking about the Future again, to the degree if not in quite the way same way that we used to do, and to reintroduce the notion that we don’t just bequeath the future—though we do, whether we think about it or not. We also, in the very broadest sense of the first person plural pronoun, inherit it.

Renny Pritikin: When we were talking the other day I said that this sounds like a cross between Borges and the vast underground special effects from Forbidden Planet. I imagine you hear lots of comparisons like that…

Paolo Salvagione: (laughs) I can’t say I’ve heard that comparison. A childhood friend once referred to the project as a cross between Tinguely and Fabergé. When talking about the clock, with people, there’s that divide-by-zero moment (in the early days of computers to divide by zero was a sure way to crash the computer) and I can understand why. Where does one place, in one’s memory, such a thing, such a concept? After the pause, one could liken it to a reboot, the questions just start streaming out.

RP: OK so I think the word for that is nonplussed. Which the thesaurus matches with flummoxed, bewildered, at a loss. So the question is why even (I assume) fairly sophisticated people like your friends react like that. Is it the physical scale of the plan, or the notion of thinking 10,000 years into the future—more than the length of human history?

PS: I’d say it’s all three and more. I continue to be amazed by the specificity of the questions asked. Anthropologists ask a completely different set of questions than say, a mechanical engineer or a hedge fund manager. Our disciplines tie us to our perspectives. More than once, a seemingly innocent question has made an impact on the design of the clock. It’s not that we didn’t know the answer, sometimes we did, it’s that we hadn’t thought about it from the perspective of the person asking the question. Back to your question. I think when sophisticated people, like you, thread this concept through their own personal narrative it tickles them. Keeping in mind some people hate to be tickled.

RP: Can you give an example of a question that redirected the plan? That’s really so interesting, that all you brainiacs slaving away on this project and some amateur blithely pinpoints a problem or inconsistency or insight that spins it off in a different direction. It’s like the butterfly effect.

PS: Recently a climatologist pointed out that our equation of time cam, (photo by Rolfe Horn) (a cam is a type of gear: link) a device that tracks the difference between solar noon and mundane noon as well as the precession of the equinoxes, did not account for the redistribution of water away from the earth’s poles. The equation-of-time cam is arguably one of the most aesthetically pleasing parts of the clock. It also happens to be one that is fairly easy to explain. It visually demonstrates two extremes. If you slice it, like a loaf of bread, into 10,000 slices each slice would represent a year. The outside edge of the slice, let’s call it the crust, represents any point in that year, 365 points, 365 days. You could, given the right amount of magnification, divide it into hours, minutes, even seconds. Stepping back and looking at the unsliced cam the bottom is the year 2000 and the top is the year 12000. The twist that you see is the precession of the equinoxes. Now here’s the fun part, there’s a slight taper to the twist, that’s the slowing of the earth on its axis. As the ice at the poles melts we have a redistribution of water, we’re all becoming part of the “slow earth” movement.

RP: Are you familiar with Charles Ray’s early work in which you saw a plate on a table, or an object on the wall, and they looked stable, but were actually spinning incredibly slowly, or incredibly fast, and you couldn’t tell in either case? Or, more to the point, Tim Hawkinson’s early works in which he had rows of clockwork gears that turned very very fast, and then down the line, slower and slower, until at the end it approached the slowness that you’re dealing with?

PS: The spinning pieces by Ray touches on something we’re trying to avoid. We want you to know just how fast or just how slow the various parts are moving. The beauty of the Ray piece is that you can’t tell, fast, slow, stationary, they all look the same. I’m not familiar with the Hawkinson clockwork piece. I’ve see the clock pieces where he hides the mechanism and uses unlikely objects as the hands, such as the brass clasp on the back of a manila envelope or the tab of a coke can.

RP: Spin Sink (1 Rev./100 Years) (1995), in contrast, is a 24-foot-long row of interlocking gears, the smallest of which is driven by a whirring toy motor that in turn drives each consecutively larger and more slowly turning gear up to the largest of all, which rotates approximately once every one hundred years.

PS: I don’t know how I missed it, it’s gorgeous. Linking the speed that we can barely see with one that we rarely have the patience to wait for.

RP: : So you say you’ve opted for the clock’s time scale to be transparent. How will the clock communicate how fast it’s going?

PS: By placing the clock in a mountain we have a reference to long time. The stratigraphy provides us with the slowest metric. The clock is a middle point between millennia and seconds. Looking back 10,000 years we find the beginnings of civilization. Looking at an earthenware vessel from that era we imagine its use, the contents, the craftsman. The images painted or inscribed on the outside provide some insight into the lives and the languages of the distant past. Often these interpretations are flawed, biased or over-reaching. What I’m most enchanted by is that we continue to construct possible pasts around these objects, that our curiosity is overwhelming. We line up to see the treasures of Tut, or the remains of frozen ancestors. With the clock we are asking you to create possible futures, long futures, and with them the narratives that made them happen.

 

再生核研究所声明 424(2018.3.29): 　レオナルド・ダ・ヴィンチとゼロ除算

次のダ・ヴィンチの言葉を発見して、驚かされた：

ダ・ヴィンチの名言 格言｜無こそ最も素晴らしい存在

我々の周りにある偉大なことの中でも、無の存在が最も素晴らしい。その基本は時間的には過去と未来の間にあり、現在の何ものをも所有しないというところにある。この無は、全体に等しい部分、部分に等しい全体を持つ。分割できないものと割り切ることができるし、割っても掛けても、足しても引いても、同じ量になるのだ。

レオナルド・ダ・ヴィンチ。ルネッサンス期を代表する芸術家、画家、彫刻家、建築技師、設計士、兵器開発者、科学者、哲学者、解剖学者、動物学者、ファッションデザイナーその他広い分野で活躍し「万能の人（uomo universale：ウォモ・ウニヴェルサーレ）」と称えられる人物

そもそも西欧諸国が、アリストテレス以来、無や真空、ゼロを嫌い、ゼロの西欧諸国への導入は相当に遅れ、西欧へのアラビヤ数字の導入は　レオナル�
�・フィボナッチ（1179年頃～1250年頃）によるとされているから、その遅れの大きさに驚かされる：

フィボナッチはイタリアのピサの数学者です。正確には「レオナルド・フィリオ・ボナッチ」といいますが、これがなまって「フィボナッチ」と呼ばれるようになったとされています。
彼は少年時代に父親について現在のアルジェリアに渡り、そこでアラビア数字を学びました。当時の神聖ローマ皇帝・フリードリヒ2世は科学と数学を重んじていて、フィボナッチは宮殿に呼ばれ皇帝にも謁見しました。後にはピサ共和国から表彰もされました。

ローマ数字では「I, II, III, X, XV」のように文字を並べて記すため大きな数を扱うのには不便でした。対してアラビア数字はローマ数字に比べてとても分かりやすく、効率的で便利だったのです。そこでフィボナッチはアラビア数字を「算術の書」という書物にまとめ、母国に紹介しました。アラビア数字では0から9までの数字と位取り記数法が使われていますが、計算に使うにはとても便利だったために、ヨーロッパで広く受け入れられることになりました。（

historicalmathematicians.blogspot.com/2012/03/blog-post.html　　02/03/2012 -）

ゼロや無に対する恐怖心、嫌疑観は現在でも欧米諸国の自然な心情と考えられる。ところが上記ダ・ヴィンチの言葉は　如何であろう。無について好ましいものとして真正面から捉えていることが分かる。ゼロ除算の研究をここ４年間して来て、驚嘆すべきこととして驚かされた。ゼロの意味、ゼロ除算の心を知っていたかのような言明である。

まず、上記で、無を、時間的に未来と過去の間に存在すると言っているので、無とはゼロのことであると解釈できる。ゼロとの捉え方は四則演算を考えているので、その解釈の適切性を述べている。足しても引いても変わらない。これはゼロの本質ではないか。さらに、凄いこと、掛けても割っても、ゼロと言っていると解釈でき、それはゼロ除算の最近の発見を意味している:  0/1 =1/0=0。－　ゼロ除算を感覚的に捉えていたと解釈できる。ところが更に、凄いことを述べている。

この無は、全体に等しい部分、部分に等しい全体を持つ。これはゼロ除算の著書DIVISION BY ZERO CALCULUS（原案）に真正面から書いている我々の得た、達したゼロに対する認識そのものである：

{\bf Fruitful world}\index{fruitful world}

\medskip

 

For example, in very and very general partial differential equations, if the coefficients or terms are zero, we have some simple differential equations and the extreme case is all the terms are zero; that is, we have trivial equations $0=0$; then its solution is zero. When we see the converse, we see that the zero world is a fruitful one and it means some vanishing world. Recall \index{Yamane phenomena}Yamane phenomena, the vanishing result is very simple zero, however, it is the result from some fruitful world. Sometimes, zero means void or nothing world, however, it will show some changes as in the Yamane phenomena.

\medskip

 

{\bf From $0$ to $0$; $0$ means all and all are $0$}

\medskip

 

As we see from our life figure, a story starts from the zero and ends to the zero. This will mean that $0$ means all and all are $0$, in a sense. The zero is a mother of all.

\medskip

 

その意味は深い。我々はゼロの意味をいろいろと捉え考え、ゼロとはさらに　基準を表すとか、不可能性を示すとか、無限遠点の反映であるとか、ゼロの2重性とかを述べている。ゼロと無限の関係をも述べている。ダ・ヴィンチの鋭い世界観に対する境地に驚嘆している。

以　上

A cool article to understand humans who control TBS ‘s press department, making incredibly incoherent editing, extremely bad biased coverage of the TBS (Mainichi Broadcasting) program of the previous chapter, It is in the topic interview feature by Ms. Yoshiko Sakurai and Mr. Naoki Hyakuta of the monthly magazine WiLL released on the 25th, ‘Japan, regain the history!’

Preamble abridgment.

‘Spirit remodeling’ of GHQ to Japan

Orishima

After the US presidential election in 2016, the fairness of the press has become a worldwide problem as the word ‘fake news’ by President Trump has become a hot topic.

Even in Japan, unilateral criticism of the Abe administration of major media, public opinion manipulation by intentional editing, etc. are rampant.

Alright, when did such biased coverage come to be done?

Hyakuta

I am writing about Japanese history now.

The fact that I realize that I am studying again is that the Japanese ‘spirit remodeling’ by GHQ still has a lasting effect.

Sakurai

The occupation policy of GHQ was unprecedentedly harsh in world history.

Hyakuta

The mind of the Japanese was destroyed by ‘War Gilt Information program’ (masochistic thought) planting sense of atonement.

The American Education for Japan thought education took in the brainwashing know-how that the Chinese Communist Party gave to the prisoners of Japan and the Kuomintang at Yan’an and Nosaka Sanzo also cooperated with the occupation policy of GHQ.

Especially the press code was bad.

A total of 30 items ‘Japanese should not write’ to Japanese newspaper publishers and publishers, for example, criticism of the GHQ, the Allied Powers and the Tokyo Trial were strictly forbidden.

Moreover, criticism of Koreans was forbidden for some reason, too.

Sakurai

We should not say that the Constitution was made by the United States and we were also prohibited from promoting nationalism, so we could not look at Japan obediently.

Of course, we should not reveal the existence of the censorship system itself.

Hyakuta

Besides censorship, a burning book was also held.

They disposed thoroughly unfavorable publication for the Allied Powers at libraries and university museums.

Speaking of burning books, it is famous for history by Qin Shin Emperor and Nazis.

This is the worst cultural destruction, history destruction.

Sakurai

America has dyed hands the same way.

The United States, which says freedom of speech, thought and belief, applied full double standards to Japan.

Eto Jun was the one who pointed out that thing properly.

Hyakuta

Over 7 thousand books were forfeited, those who resist ‘Please leave it as an important document’ was harsh, being sentenced to imprisonment for ten years or less.

In Article 10 of the Potsdam Declaration, it is written that ‘The Government of Japan must promote democracy. Freedom of speech, religion and thought, and respect for fundamental human rights must be established.’

This is a violation of the obvious ‘Potsdam Declaration’ beyond mere double criteria.

Distorted learning

Sakurai

The expulsion of public officials was also terrible.

Because more than 200 thousand people who were assigned the important office, including the government office, were unable to work.

Hyakuta

Ichiro Hatoyama on the verge of being appointed prime minister was also expelled from the public office.

Even those who are not convenient for GHQ will be disposed of even by the Prime Minister candidate, much more ordinary people cannot speak much bad.

Especially, it was the educational circle that was terrible.

Sakurai

Excellent professors of Tokyo University and Kyoto University were also disposed of in large quantities.

Hyakuta

Prior to the war, anarchists and owner of revolutionary thought had been kicked out of the imperial university.

However, after the war, they returned to the teacher one after another finding favor with GHQ, and soon eventually dominated university education.

That idea has penetrated even higher and secondary education, and it reaches now.

Sakurai

There were cases where scholars who had a decent idea turned to change to be loved by GHQ.

A typical example is Toshiyoshi Miyazawa, a constitutional scholar.

Hyakuta

He was critical of the Constitution of Japan and the Constitution of Japan was said to be a ‘pressing constitution’ by GHQ.

However, witnessing the appearance of colleagues purged by GHQ, he changed his thought completely.

Sakurai

It has changed by a hundred and eighty degrees.

Hyakuta

The ‘August Revolutionary Theory’ was started to argue newly.

Briefly, acceptance of the Potsdam Declaration in August 1945 is a kind of revolution, at that time Japan changed from sovereignty of the Emperor to national sovereignty.

In other words, the idea that the Constitution of Japan is the right Constitution made possible by the revolution.

Sakurai

Mr. Miyazawa kept reigning at the top of the Tokyo University Constitutional Course since then.

Hyakuta

In a vertical society university, Miyazawa Constitution Studies will be handed over ‘Thankful words’ by assistant professors and assistant.

In fact, it seems that the University of Tokyo still teaches that the August Revolution theory is correct.

Judging from the fact that the August Revolution theory is also a common theory in the judicial examination, I cannot deny that the JFBA has become a strange organization.

‘Entry Elite’ who entered the University of Tokyo by entrance exam with only memorization let them study such outrageous theory.

Whether it is the Treasury Department or the Ministry of Education, the bureaucrats who are making noise news will surely come from the University of Tokyo law department.

Because they cannot think that things by themselves, ‘pretending to obey but secretly betraying’ and say it is only possible to pull the legs of politics.

Sakurai

A lot of bureaucrats who do not consider the national interest are seen also in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Hyakuta

Another person I would like to introduce is Yokota Kisaburo.

He is also an authority of the university of Tokyo Faculty of Law, but continues to say that the Constitution of Japan is not pressing, and during the occupation it is also issuing a book called ‘Emperor System’ that advocated abolition of the Emperor System.

However, in the later years, when appointed Chief Justice of Japan, he gathered the pupils and purchased his books at an old book store in Kanda for disposal.

‘Indeed, the abolition of the Emperor System was unfavorable’ he thought.

So, I cannot find his book quite easily.

Sakurai

It has done without thinking being ashamed of the horrible thing, too.

What distorted academics is nothing but a tragedy.

The apostasy of the Asahi Newspaper

Hyakuta

If you turn backwards, that is how tightening of GHQ was strict.

Losing your job in Japan, then the poorest country in the world, is literally involved in life and death.

Sakurai

For the people who were expelled, it was such a terrible situation that they were thrown away by the abyss of living or dead in the sense that families had to cultivate.

Hyakuta

Another thing I would like to say is that the civil service bureau of GHQ, who led the expulsion of public office, cannot have enough people to list over 200,000 Japanese.

So, who was it that helped with this?

Sakurai

It is Japanese.

In cooperation with GHQ, there was a Japanese who banished the Japanese.

Hyakuta

Socialists and communists used opportunities of purge of public office to eliminate political enemies.

Even within the company, there seems to be a lot of cases in which the boss and his co
lleague were kicked off and the career was promoted.

* Mr. Takayama Masayuki taught that many Chongryon officials got jobs including NHK, had taken advantage of the mess after the war,

The reason why they, or their descendants, still dominate NHK, TV Asahi, TBS etc. is probably due to chasing down as above *

This draft continues.

 · 

偉大なアバター達（神の化身、イエスや仏陀など）の教えは、誤解や誤訳を繰りし、時代と共に、その精度をさげてゆきました。そして、その解釈をめぐる争いや、聖職者たちのスキャンダルによって、宗教は、人々のこころから離れてゆきます。

これは、人間が、人間として生きてゆくうえでは、避けられない問題です。何故なら、ある人にとっての“真実”は、異なった意識レベルの人々にとっては、“真実”とは見えないからです。しかし、今日キネシオロジーの技術の確立と共に、アバター達の教えは、見事に復権を果たしました。

「真実か、嘘か」デヴィッド・R・ホーキンズ、2005年、第1章　知覚に関する歴史Truth vs. Falsehood, David R. Hawkins, 2005, Chapter 1 Historical Perspective, page 3, (A)

はじめに
人類は誕生してから今日まで、人類の起源、目的、運命の謎について熟考し、苦悩してきました。「私達は誰？」「私達は何処から来たのか？」「私達は肉体の死後、何処かへ行くのなら、それこそ何処へ？」

何千年紀を通して、無数のより良い仮説は、満足のゆく解決策の提案を探してきました。過剰な想像と、創造された宇宙論と同じように、神話、組織体系、哲学議論に関して無数にあります。しかしながら、それらの各々は、全てさらに、それ以上の疑問と疑念、そして葛藤がセットになり、再びスタート地点となりました。

天国や地球は、原初の母から来たと仮定されていました。汎神論は、動物のこころ（スピリッツ）と大自然は、人格と限界を伴う非凡な人々、神のような人々、人々が信じる神に似た全ての神々といった多神論を、展開させた人間の生命の起源ですが、領域は特定され提案されました。

もっとも、世界の様々な地域において、スピリチュアルの啓示と、情報からの真実は、伝説と聖人、そして全人類の宗教の各派の中に、いくつかの解決策をもたらした偉大な宗教を創設した神の化身（アバター）を通して、示されていました。しかし再び平和でもない、確実性もないものが現れました。実際、それぞれの指導者に従っていた人々は、しばしば憎しみと民族大虐殺の正当化と、迫害の基盤といった本来の宗教で信じられている様々な体系を利用し、競争を煽る分派と化し、そのもの（根本的教義）をばらばらにして来ました。逆説的に、平和について、いくもの主要な宗教教義が、誤解や誤訳され、それらの教えの核心部分とは、露骨に正反対の側のものとなりました。

それらそのものの教えの真実から、それる事は、慣習のみならず、その宗教理論の説得力と、統一性に関する懐疑論を生み出しました。その信頼性の欠如によって、付け加えられたのは、世評において否定的な影響でした。神権政治は、その教義のみならず圧制にもまた現れました。そしてしばしば、彼らの教義は、本質について、真実に関する認識を尊重するよりむしろ、恐怖への執着を示しました。世界の多くの地域では、宗教の評判は、漸進的に悪化しました。例えば、現代では、西欧と、北米の大部分では、最近のイスラム軍国主義と、いくつかのキリスト教会のスキャンダルの否定的な影響によって促進され、漸進的に（だんだんと）宗教から開放された状態を示しています。

宗教とスピリチュアルの懐疑主義は、また信頼に代わって十分な程、権威主義の失墜を生み出してきました。過去、数世紀にわたり科学の支配と、科学的事実のパラダイム（枠組み）の出現は、それ以上特に権威と宗教教義の信頼を減退させました。逆説的に、宗教闘争は、彼らが置き換える事を意図されていた過酷さ同様、漸進的に宗教闘争が、彼等が置き換えることを意図していた過酷さ同様に、漸進的に政治イデオロギーへと、置き換えられました。

現代において、チベット、中国、ロシア、東欧、東南アジア、北アフリカ、アラブ諸国、そしてキューバで、支配下に置かれた人々のように、新たな宗教裁判への時代が到来しました。その上、不幸な事に、世界では、例えば、イスラム原理主義者たちによって、その暴力と、狂信的行為によって世界を恐れさせるといった、宗教の狂信的行動による政治的過激主義が合流していて、それとは対照的に宗教から開放された状態は、歓迎看板のように見えます。

対立を生まないパワーと異なり、対立を生むフォースは、政治、宗教の単独か、又は両方で常にストレートに反発力を引き出します。もっとも、真実は、嘘が真実の対極にあるのではなく、単にそれに欠けているだけで、ちょうど暗闇は、光の対極ではなく、単に明るさを欠いているのと同じです。

人類の意識レベルは、ほぼ1980年代後半に人間の性質の収斂に近づく機会があり、数世紀間停滞していた真実と、統合性の臨界レベル200を超え、突然205へジャンプしました。世界で最も進んだ文化において意識レベルの上昇は、成功への比較基準同様に、統合性を伴った利得に置き換えられました。非統合的な会社や、その最高経営責任者は、スキャンダルの中心にいて、ひとつの時代の終焉を確実にした一方で、同じ時期に、国際的な巨大企業の統合性の最も高いレベルにある企業は、世界でも最も巨大で成功した企業となりました。

決定的重要性を持つ人類の調和の好機（しかし、引き起こしたのではなく）であり、20年近く確実に、穏やかな調和を実践された後、現在、再び意識レベルは207へ上昇しました。

同じ時代に、意識研究は、真実と嘘を、識別する手法の発見といった結果をもたらす程の進展を遂げました。真実は単に“イエス”か“ノー”ではなく、対数で、1から1,000まで計測され、表現可能な事がわかりました。意識は何処にでも存在し、時間と空間の限界を超越しているという理由で、限界がない為、社会全ての側面と同様に、スピリチュアルの概念、教義、そしてスピリチュアルの真実性に関する証明といった事柄も調査可能で、まったく新しい意識の科学です。ひとつの真実の新たな認識は、ニュートン物理学の原理による結果とは、まったく異なるもので、特定の領域の中にある内容の結果から、生じたものであると証明されました。これはニュートン物理学には、真実の信頼できる声明は不可能であり、その関連した領域に真実は、存在しないと確認されました。

意識の研究は、物質に従属するといった限界がないので、時代を超えて、偉大なスピリチュアル、神秘主義や、高等科学にやっと近づけ、初めてその領域の研究を許されました。その上、同じ調査手法を用いて�
��宗教や聖職者の教義と同様に、スピリチュアルの概念、導師や聖職者の教えの真実レベルを計測出来て、特定可能です。調査において、歴史上、最も高い真実レベルは、認められていようが、そうでなかろうが、そのエネルギーフィールドは、いまだに、現代の全人類に影響を与えている偉大な神秘家だと分かります。

無神論者や、懐疑主義者といった人々により、スピリチュアルの真実性を否認された時さえ、全ての倫理と道徳律の前後関係は、そのオリジナルの認識を否定したとして、人類の全ての年齢層を支配している状況はまだ残っています。現在では、倫理とスピリチュアル同様に、知性の進歩は、意識そのものの性質についての急速な情報の展開同様に、全ての意識の進歩を促進させています。

最先端の科学理論の展開において、全ての物質の存在に共通する亜母体（意思や原形質を表現しているものという意味）が、高い振動エネルギーから成る事を自明とみなします（この声明は、1,000で規則）。スピリチュアルの真実と、意識研究、そして高度な理論物理学を統合する難しさは、知性の二元的にものを考える性質です。その上、知覚された“真実性”の観察力の記述は、表のように、比較リストにより区分されているように、物質対、非物質、経験対、観察といった異なった支配のカテゴリーや、領域の中に分割されているように見えます。

Introduction
From earliest times to the present day, mankind has pondered and struggled with the enigma of its origin, purpose, and destiny: Who are we? Where did we come from? Where do we go after death of the body, if anywhere?

Over the millennia, a myriad of plausible postulations have sought to offer a satisfying resolution. There arose a number of myths, systems, and philosophical discussions, as well as a plethora of imagination and creative cosmologies, each of which, however, became the stating point for whole additional set of questions, doubts, and conflicts.

It was postulated that mankind came from the heavens or that the earth was the primordial mother. Pantheism struggled that animal spirits and nature were the origin of human life that evolved into polytheism and pantheons of god-like, divine figures, each with personalities and limited, but specified, domains.

In various parts of the world, however, truth via spiritual inspiration and information emerged through the fabled sages and then in the form of the great avatars who founded the great religious that brought some resolution in rational sections of the world’s population, but again, neither peace nor creating arose. In fact, the followers of each leader often fragmented themselves into competitive factions that utilized religious belief system as the justification and basis for persecution hatred, and genocide. Paradoxically, in peace, some misinterpretations of the major religious became the blatantly diametrical opposite of the core of their own teachings.

There deviations from the truth of their own teachings created skepticism about the authority and integrity of not only the institution but also of its theology. In addiction on the loss of credibility, there was a negative impact on public opinion. Theocracies appeared to be not only dogmatic but also oppressive, and often, adherence to their tents was from fear rather respect for an intuitive recognition of truth. In many parts of the world, the reputation of religion progressively deteriorated. At the present time, for example, Western Europe and large parts of North America have shown a progressive secularization that is now accelerated by the negative impact of the current militant Islamics and the scandals of some Christian churches.

Religious and spiritual skepticism was also a by-product of the fall of authoritarianism as a sufficiency upon which to place confidence. In the last few centuries, the emergence of the dominance of the science and the scientific paradigm of reality further diminished the credibility of religious dogma, particularly ecclesiastic authority. Religious conflict was progressively replaced by political ideologies that, paradoxically, were as oppressive 
As the dogmas they were purposed to replace.

A new period of inquisition arrived, such as that which the people of Tibet, China, Russia, Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, North Africa, The Arabic countries, and Cuba have been subjected in recent time. Then, unfortunately for the world there was a merging of political extremism with religious zealotry, as exemplified by Islamic radicalism that threatens the world with its violence and fanaticism, in contrast to which secularization seems a welcome relief.

Unlike power, which has no opposite, force always precipitates counterforce, which the opposing force are political, religious, or both. Truth, however, has no opposite because falsehood is not the opposite of truth but merely its absence, just as darkness is not opposite of light but merely represents the lack of it.

At approximately the time of the humanic Convergence in the late 1980s, the consciousness level of mankind suddenly jumped for centuries, to 205, which is above critical level of truth and integrity at 200. In more advanced culture of the world, this rise in the consciousness level resulted in replacing gain with integrity as the yardstick of success. The ensured a period of time in which nonintegrous companies and their CEOs were the center of scandal, which at the time, the company that had the highest level of integrity of the giant corporations worldwide became the largest and most successful company in the world.

Of critical importance is that in November 2003, at the time of (but not “caused by”) the Harmonic Concordance, the consciousness level of mankind, after being stable for nealy two decades, rose again to the present level of 207.

During the same time period, consciousness research advanced as a consequence of the discovery of a means to differentiate truth from falsehood. It was forced that truth was a simple “yes” or “no” but that it was expressible over a calibrated, logarithmic scale from 1 to 1,000. Because consciousness is present everywhere and beyond the limitations of time or space, there is a whole new science of consciousness that, because it has no limit, also enable s research into spiritual concepts, spiritual teachings, and the verification of spiritual realities as well as every aspect of society. A new definition of truth emerged that is defined not as a consequence of just content, as in Newtonian physics, but as the consequence of content within a specific field. It was discovered that without reference to the field, there was no possible, reliable statement of truth.

Because consciousness research has no limitations as to matter, it allows investigation into areas previously through to be accessible only by advanced science, the mystic, or great spiritual geniuses over time. Thus, by the use of the same investigative method, it was possible to identify and calibrate the levels of truth of spiritual concepts, teachers and teachings the highest levels of truth in history were realized by the great mystics whose energy fields still impact all mankind to the day, whether acknowledged or not.

Even when spiritual reality is denied, such as by the atheist or skeptic, and overall context of ethics and morality still remains that rules all mankind in all ages, even through recognition of its origination is denied. At the present time, intellectual as well as ethical and spiritual endeavor are facilitated by these adva
nces of consciousness overall as well as by the rapid development of information about the quality of consciousness itself.

The most recent advanced scientific theory postulate that there is a common submatrix to all physical existence, consisting of high-frequency fields of energy (this statement calibrates at 1,000). The difficulty with integrating spiritual truth, consciousness research, and advanced theorical physics is that the mind thinks dualistically. Thus, to observation and description, perceived “reality” seems to be repeated into different categories of domains or realms, such as the physical versus the nonphysical, or the experimental versus the observable, as demarcated by the following list of comparisons:

 

 

 

 · 

本日は、いわゆる超能力について、そして「無条件の愛」の超越（悟りレベル）のご紹介です。このレベルは、ホーキンズ博士も論述している通り、「知能/理性/知性」での理解は不可能です。

また、「個人の中で制御出来るものにはなりません」ということを、まずお伝えねばなりません。自分の超能力を誇ることほど、神仏への道は遠回りとなるでしょう。

テクニックによるクンダリニーエネルギーの取り込みとは異なり、意識レベル540とそれを超えたところでは、本人の意志とは無関係にそのエネルギーは突然、体に流れ込みます。

また、540以上で生まれるヒーリング能力や、585以上で起こる霊視能力などの非日常的な超能力も、本人の意志とは無関係に芽生えます。

従って、それらの能力は、非個人的なものであり、意識の進歩の過程でもたらされるものです。ゆえに、それを競い、必要以上の金銭を得る目的で利用することは、自我の罠、すなわちアストラルの回り道となることを認識すべきです。

あくまで、その能力は、神仏との合一への道標の一過程であり、それは統合的（意識レベル200以上）な意図に基づき活用され、人類の平安と進歩に寄与すべきものです。

本日の「スピリチュアルの現象」の節は、この章で最も重要とも言えます。また、一言一句がホーキンズ博士の慈愛にあふれています。その上、真実を知ることで、ひとりひとりの意識レベルが上がることにより、日本のみならず、人類全体の平安につながることを理解いただければ、私にとってこの上ない喜びです。

第一五章 無条件の愛、こころの底からの喜び、エクスタシー（計測レベル540～599）（8)
Transcending the levels of consciousness, David R. Hawkins, 2006,
Chapter 15　love, Joy, and Ecstasy (Calibration Level 540～599)

スピリチュアル現象：ザ・シッディズ
（訳者注：最下段にあるヴィキペディア英語版からの引用の訳出を参照のこと）
意識レベル540または、500台の高位への上昇より自然に生まれる現象において、知性、慣習、論理的概念化、もしくは成り行きとその影響は、説明できずに起こります。こころの奥深いところからのエネルギー（クンダリニー）の漸進的な（だんだんと増してゆく）支配はつきもので、意志作用よりむしろ情況（心の状態/状況）的領域の結果生じます。この現象は、目撃され、そして自動的に生じることだと分かります。それらは、古典的呼び方でシッディ（サンスクリット）と名付けられ、そして論理的説明は不可能なもので、超常的/魔術的パワーと描写されています。

それらの現象が現れたごく初期段階では、時折起こるでしょうが、しかし、意識が進歩したとき、頻繁に、そして度々継続されるようになります。それらの現象は、それ自体とは調和せずに起こります。それらとは、遠視力、超科学的予知、透視力、霊聴力、超能力、サイコメトリー（超感覚的知覚）、バイロケーション（生霊/複所在同時両存在）で、そして、自発生的なヒーリングと、変容を含む奇跡の発生といった能力を含みます。それらは予想や、説明の可能性を超えて独特の現象はまた促進されます。

この能力や現象は、個人の中で制御出来るものにはなりません。それらは、「原因と結果」に起因していません。従って、生徒達（こころの原理の探求者）は、それらを個人的な「私」「私自身」から離れて生じていて、個人に関することと、同じように主張することのないよう、事前に警告されます。従って、あらかじめ言われるというのは、非個人が、単に“こころの状況の進歩”によって起きた奇跡を、演じているといえます。こころの自我の肥大化は、謙虚さと正直さを排除する一方で、利得のために、利己的に使用する誘惑と結果的に終わります。この現象は、一定しない数年の持続期間に、強さを増して現れる傾向にあります。何人かは、消えてしまうようです。そして、少しの人はその能力が優勢で、他の人々は永遠に続きます。

クンダリニーエネルギーは、主観的に、その感覚は、あたかもハートチャクラを通じて現れ、背中を上昇し、脳内へ流れ込むように、ただ絶妙と描写されるのみでしょう。そして、そのとき、意志とは無関係に生じ、目撃されるその存在の促進は、宇宙から入ってきます。それ自体は非日常的なものです。あたかも神の特性が、この日常的な物質社会を超越した高い領域から現れ運ばれてきたようです。

最終的に、非日常的な現象の出現は、あたかも管弦楽用に編集された曲が、不可能に見える程、効果的に現れ、いまや別の次元に生きているかのように、新たな現実性が生まれます。その領域のパワーは、カルマの性質を明らかにされたことによって、表に示された現実性の中へ、カルマのその潜在性の表出を促進します。この力学は非線形です。従って理性において理解することは、因果律に関する線形のニュートン物理学のモデルに限界があると推定され不可能です。そして神性の摂理、もしくは、調和による現出について概念化できるものではありません。

ヴィキペディアより（英語版）
シッディは、完璧、成就、達成、成功として訳すことが出来るサンスクリットの名詞。
シッディは、インドの人々の言葉であり、アフリカの言葉と取り違えないこと（時々スペルを同一にしていることから）・・・。シッディは、インドの探求の道のことで、サンスクリットでいうスピリチュアル・パワー。それを許されるため、各々シッディは、追い求められ、そして他の知覚を手に入れる。

こころの底からの喜びとエクスタシーを超越する 
すべての進歩を妨げる信仰、状況による態度の性質、疑念、そして執着を放棄することは、こころの探求に身を投じて付随して生じるスピリチュアル・エネルギーの内側への流れを許します。（555で計測）こころの底から生まれる�
�実と愛へ、一までも続く献身は、自我の抵抗の消滅を許されます。超越するには、例えば、責務として自分自身、そして社会において性格づけられたものさえ、すべての執着の放棄を求められます。従って、最終的に交友関係、地位、肩書き、そして社会的役割は、偉大なる自己（ハイヤー・セルフ）を実現、もしくは悟りの状態に達する行為に捧げるために捨て去られます。ためらう気乗りしないこころの探求者は、「しかし、どう？」と子供じみた問いかけをし、そして疑念に固執します。この解決策は、「しかし、神や神の摂理はどうなの？」というすべての疑念を放棄することです。

ある大きな移り変わりは、必然的に生まれる他者への責任があり、現実的な調整を必要とし、また求められる変化を受け入れ、他者を助けることでもまたあります。ゆえに、この移り変わりは、疑念、執着、罪の意識、そしてその好みの残り物を持ち出すことを有罪とするのと同様に、かなり勇気と忍耐を要します。

意識の大きな飛躍について起きるかも知れない事象は、もし事前に警告するならば、予想される計画を達成することは、ほとんどの求道者にとって、まずないだろうという、その厳しい現実を考慮させることです。従って、厳格に追求する人々は、気力を溢れさせ、意識の進んだ状態を理解している可能性のあるスピリチュアルの協力者もしくは、信頼関係を、また持たねばなりません。

そのこころの状態は、小さな自己が、偉大なる自己により隠れることより、小さくなるのと同様に、漸進的に優勢になります。この結果、内面と外面の両方とも期待よりもっと大きなものだと分かります。

この漸進的な（だんだんとした）意識の高レベルの現れは、新しいひとつの眼鏡を求められ、その時に方針の転換への周期的な報いを弱める“名利”を追う働きといったことへの調整期間を求められます。この際順応と現象は、いつもの仮定される前提と、原因と結果の知覚から、むしろそれら自身に関し、自然発生的に起こされると分かります。喜びは、いまや何もかもを手に入れるのではなく、何かの力や個人的決断からといったことより、むしろ本質的なその領域パワーの結果です。これは推定される二元的因果律の原理を超え、新たな現実性のパラダイム（その時の能力的、知覚的限界としての枠組み）から、自立するカルマの潜在性を明らかにするためのものとなります。その上、奇跡として現れるものは何でも、単に一生涯の主観的体験がすべてを知っている状態の中に溶け込み、そして置き換わることによって、絶え間なく創造の進化の潜在性を明らかにしているだけのものです。同様に、変化する知覚は、潜在状態の実現化である顕現させることに成功するのと同様に、創造の継続の漸進的な現れによって、取って換えられます。過去ではなく、未来でもないのと同様に「今」は存在しません。そして過去、現在、未来は、パラダイム（知覚や思考などの常識の枠組み）の限界に応じ、すべての幻の情況（こころの状況）を再構築化した結果です。すべての信仰の体系は、その立場にある性質を放棄することに伴い創造のはっきりして来る状態は、自動的に啓示されるものです。このはっきりしてくる状態の過程は、とても稀な本物のスピリチュアルの高度に進歩した師への照会から可能となるのと同様に、信頼と献身に対して身を委ねねばならない贈りもの、不確定要素、一時的疑念を育むでしょう。これらの点で、意識そのものの領域の及ぶ中の振動する周波数と同じ内在する秘密をすべて知る状態は、現れたパラダイムの現実性を展開し、明らかになります。偉大なる自己の輝く恩寵により、その眩いばかりの明らかになったものは、静けさです。そのとき、世界はひとつの出現より、むしろひとつの本質の啓示となります。

この自動的な啓示は、神と同じ秘密の全てを知る状態により、漸進的（だんだん）に認識され同一視されるようになります。パラダイム（知覚、思考、信念などの枠組み）の大きな転換は、推測や実際に現象させることさえ出来ません。そして、その兆候は、時々、“ゴッド・ショック”と謎めいた描写がなされます。この結末は、知能としてのこころに内在する神における静寂のなかにあり、600レベルで姿を消すことにより、こころの底からの気付きがあります。これから後、すべては、始まりも終わりもありません。そのとき、今、未来といった区別そのものはなく、そのものが現れ継続し、ただその存在するものと同じようにそこに存在します。もはや、“それ”は存在しないので、明らかにされたものは、頭の中で考える状態（思考）や、個人の自己の作因はもはや起こりません。

基本的にこころの探求の原理への固執は、大きな変容に、またそれらの信頼（捧げること）に関して不可欠なものです。そして身を委ねることは、主要な様式です。それは単にどのような、そしてすべての信仰、信念、またすべての恐怖は、人間の執着と身近で一般的な「現実」的パラダイムへの信頼を含むひとつのその人の状況とその知覚されるものにしがみつくことに対しての幻であり、報いであるとの理解の放棄を求めているはずです。単に推定である線形の次元によって知覚される自我にとって、実際、その道は何もなく、非線形の完全さは、結果として生じる理解や、認識よりむしろ自然に隠れていたものが、現れる完全に異なる原理に基づく作用としての、とても異なるパラダイムです。

実際に「存在（するものすべて）」は、その意志と、それと同一のものです。主語、述語や、動詞はなく、そしてそれは言語での表現超えた悟性です。良くても説明されることが可能なとき、ひとつのものの「意味」は存在するものです。同一性は、この意味です。すべての描写と言明（定義）は、それらの最初の説明を回りくどくあるがまま、または具体的に熟慮し、思い描く二元的抽象概念と精神作用であることは、明らかです。真実は、十全な状態/性質（Allness）として存在の全一の状態/性質（Oneness）は、それ自体が定義であり意味です。従って、一匹の猫として存在しているお陰により、一匹の猫であると知っています。ゆえに、その自分自身の真実性から二元的分離されることはありません。知るものと。知られるものは、ひとつであり、そして全く同一のものです。

こころのエクスタシーと喜びのレベルを超越するには、説明を超えた次元に関するもので、例えエクスタシーの絶妙な状態でさえ含むものであっても、神へすべて委ねる意欲次第です。いまやこの状態そのものは、誘惑されるもので、�
��りの状態への進歩を遅らせるでしょう。最初は、神へこのような見事な状態を放棄することに気乗りせず、うろたえます。そしてまだ、この驚きの状態でさえ手放さねばならないと、秘密を知る状況により示されます。このステップを選択し経験していることに関する苦悩とためらいは、この状況へのひとつの執着と、その驚きの状態が、すでに見えないところで、席を奪っているのは明らかです。そのとき、献身と意図のために「はい、それを、汝に主よ」と放棄せねばならぬという確信が存在します。意識レベル600においてすべての理解と描写を超えて支配されます。この状態は、神の平安に関する現実性そのものの現れです。

（訳者注：Reify (vb) to consider or make (an abstract idea or concept) real or concrete. 
あるがまま、または具体的（抽象的なアイデアや概念）に熟慮し、思い描くこと）

―　第一五章 無条件の愛、こころの底からの喜び、エクスタシー　終わり　―

Spiritual Phenomena: The Siddhi 
From consciousness level 540 and up the higher 500s, phenomena occur spontaneously that inexplicable by reason, the customary conceptualization of logic, or course and effect. They are an accompaniment to the progressive dominance of the spiritual energy (Kundalini) and occur a consequence of the contextual field rather their by volition. They are witnessed and seen to occur a consequence of the contextual field rather than by volition. They are witnessed and seen to occur autonomously. These have been classically termed Siddhi (Sanskrit) and denote ‘supranatural’ or ‘miraculous/mystical powers’, as they are not explicable by logic.

In the early stages of their appearance they may be sporadic, but as consciousness advances, they become frequent and sometimes continuous. They are unintended and arise of their own accord. These include faculties such as distant viewing precognition, clairvoyance, extrasensory perception, psychometry, bilocation, and the occurrence of the miraculous, including spontaneous healing and transformations. There are also unique facilitations that are beyond expectation or possible explanation.

The capacities or phenomena are not within personal control: they are not the consequence of ‘cause and effect’. Therefore, students are forewarned not to claim them as personal as they occur independently of the person’s ‘I’, oneself. Thus, as said previously, no ‘person’ performs miracles for they are solely a consequence of the Spirit. Inflation of the spiritual ego is precluded by honesty and humility, which results in temptation of exploitation for gain. The phenomena tend to emerge and become strong for variable durations of years. Some seen to fade away and become less predominant, and others continue permanently.

The Kundalini energy flow is itself extraordinary in that subjectively, the sensation can only be described as exquisite as it flows up the back and into the brain, emerges as though through the heart chakra, and then goes on out into the world where its presence facilitates are witnessed as happening without intention. It is as though Divine qualities are brought into manifestation vis high realms that transcend the mundane physical world.

Eventually, the apparent ‘extraordinary’ becomes a new reality as though one now lives in a different dimension in which the seemingly impossible manifests effortlessly as through orchestrated. The power of the field autonomously facilitates the emergence of karmic potentiality into manifested actuality in a harmonious unfoldment. The dynamics are nonlinear and therefore incomprehensible to the intellect, which presumes the limitation of the linear Newtonian model of causality and is unable to conceptualize emergence, Divine Order, or Harmony.

Wikipedia
Siddhi is a Sanskrit noun which can be translated as “perfection”, “accomplishment”, “attainment”, or “success”.
Siddhi not to be confused with the African… people of India (through sometimes spelt identically). Siddhi is Sanskrit is term for spiritual power… their path. Other perceptive hold that each Siddhi should be pursued because it will allow…

Transcending Joy and Ecstasy 
The surrendering of all limiting beliefs, positionalities, doubts, and attachments allows for the inflow of spiritual energy, which is the concomitance of devotion (cal. 555). Persistent devotion to spiritual truth and love allows for the dissolution of resistances. Transcendence requires the relinquishment of all attachments, even those characterized by self and society as ‘responsibilities’. Thus, relationships, positions, titles, and social roles are eventually abandoned to the commitment to realize the Self or reach the state of Enlightenment. The reluctant devote who holds back clings to doubt and asks naively, But what about? The solution is to surrender all the ‘but what about’s’ to God and Divine Providence.

A major transition also necessitates responsibility to others by making necessitates responsibility to others by making necessary and realistic adjustments and helping to accept the required changes. This transition may therefore take considerable courage and patience as well as conviction, for it brings up residual doubts, attachments, guilt, and the like.

The eventuality of a major leap in consciousness is seldom taken into consideration as a serious possibility, much less a likelihood, among most aspirants who, unless forewarned, may not have made anticipatory plans. Therefore, serious students should be informed and also have spiritual alliance or relationships that are capable of recognizing advanced states of consciousness.

The inner state is progressively dominant as self diminishes by the eclipse of the Self. The consequent changes, both inner and outer, turn out to be more major than anticipated.

The emergence of progressively higher levels of consciousness requires periods of adjustment, such as that required by a new pair of glass, and thus, worldly function may be impaired periodically due to shifts of orientation. In this reorientation, phenomena are discovered to be happening spontaneously of their own rather than via usual presumed premise of cause and effect. Pleasure is no longer something one acquires but is innate consequent to the power of the field rather than via some agency or personal decision. It is also progressively discovered that there is actually no ‘doer’ of actions, and one witness the autonomous unfoldment of karmic potentiality from a new paradigm of reality that is beyond the presumptive dualistic principle of creation. Thus, life becomes an endless serious of revelations of intrinsic claim and delight that initially seem amazing. Then comes the realization that what appears to be miracles is merely the constant unfolding of the potentiality of the evolution of Creation by which the subjective experience of time dissolves and is replaced by the knowingness of all Is-ness. Likewise, the perception of ‘change’ is replaced by the progressive emergence of the ongoingness of Creation as becoming the fulfillment of potentiality’s actualizing into manifestation. With neither past nor future, likewise, there is no ‘now’, and it is comprehend that the past, present, or future are all illusory contexualizations consequence consequent to the limitation of a paradigm. With the surrendering of all belief systems and positionalities, the unfoldment of Creation is self-revealing. The unfolding process may bring up presentations, uncertainties, or transitory doubt that have to be surrendered to faith and devotion as there is very rarely a really advanced spiritual teacher available for cons
ultation. At these points, the knowingness inherent as a vibratory frequency within the field of consciousness itself unfolds and reveals the reality of the emerging paradigm. By virtue of the Radiance of the Self, the revealing effalgences are silent. The world then becomes a revelation of Essence rather than an appearance.

The self-revelation becomes progressively recognized and identified Knowingness as Divinity. The major shift of paradigm cannot be anticipated or even really imaged, and it onset is sometimes describes cryptically as ‘God shock’. The consequence is profound awe by which the mind goes silent in the presence of Divinity and disappears at level 600. Henceforth, all is merely as it as a continuous unfoldment that reveals itself as neither beginnings nor endings nor division such as ‘then’, ‘now’, or the ‘future’. Realization no longer occurs as a consequence of mentalization, through or by the agents of a personal self because it no longer exists.

Adherence to basic spiritual principles is requisite to major transformation, and of these, faith, devotion, and surrender are its primary modalities. It merely requires the surrendering of any and all belief systems and the understanding that all fear is illusion due merely to clinging to a positionality and its presumptions, including one’s adherence and faith in the familiar, customary paradigm of ‘reality’. Nothing is a actually the way the ego has perceived it for linear dimension is merely presumptive,
And the nonlinear Absolute is a very different paradigm that operates on totally different principles that are self-revealing rather than sequential understanding or comprehension.

In reality, ‘existence’ is its meaning and identical with it. These is no subject, predicate, or verb, and the understanding it beyond languaging. As can be best stated, the ‘meaning’ of a thing is it ‘is’. Identity is its meaning. It becomes apparent that all delineation and definition are dualistic abstractions and mentations that circuitously reify their original definition. Truth is autonomously self-encompassing Oneness of Existence is its own definition and meaning. Thus, a cat ‘knows’ it is cat by virtue of being a cat and therefore is not dualistically separated from its own reality. The knower and the known are one and the same identity.

The transcendence of spiritual ecstasy and joy depends on the willingness to surrender all to God, no matter what, including even the exquisite ate of ecstasy, which is of a dimension beyond description. The state itself is now a temptation and can delay the evolution to the sate of Enlightenment. At first, there is a reluctance and dismay to surrendering such a glorious condition to God, and yet, there arises a knowingness that even this wonderment, too, must be released. The anguish and hesitancy of having to take the step reveals that an attachment to the condition and its wonderment has ready unwittingly taken place. Then because of commitment and intention, there is conditional that yes, this, too must be surrendered “to thee, O Load,” and with its surrender, an infinite Peace prevails that is beyond all understanding or description at level 600. The condition reveals itself to be the actuality of the Peace of God.

Marcerate  refers to softening solids by breaking them into pieces. The Saniflo macerating systems has a rotating cutting blade which liquefy the feces and toilet paper. Thus, when the feces are mixed with flushing water, it will easily flush into the drain. 
Installing a toilet in the room can be a complicated process. Sometimes, the main drainpipe is located too further away. If the sink is lower than the drainpipe, the installation of the toilet will be not operable. With the Saniflo upflushing toilet, you will be able to minimize the installation procedure.
The Saniflos macerator units have a tested blade type grinding system which can pump the human feces up to a distance of 150 feet and up to height of 18 feet. You can also activate the macerator system to pump the waste away into the septic tank or sewer. The waste is pumped into a holding septic tank which functions as a sewer system that complies with the applicable codes.
If the Saniflo unit is properly used, it will not emit any smells. The latest Saniflo model has a carbon filter in the air inlet valve. In order to keep your Saniflo system in good condition, you must pour in a strong disinfectant into the WC pan. The strong disinfectant must be poured into a bucket with about 8  9 liters of water. After that, you can pour the water into the WC pan and turn the power on. Before turning the power on, you should leave it for about 1  2 hours.  Once the power is switched on, the unit will pump out and flush the WC.
Saniflo system is economical because it can last for a long time. According to the National Recognized laboratory, the Saniflo system can last for 50,000 cycles. For example, If you flush 10 times per day, It can last for thirteen and a half year. Since this is just an estimate, the Saniflo system can last for a longer period. In addition, it helps to reduce the labor costs and increase flexibility. However, sanitary items and tampons should not be disposed through the Saniflo toilet because it can cause blockage. 
The motor of the macerator system does not need maintenance because it has no gear or brushes to wear out. The motor is covered with oil so that it can last for a long time without constant maintenance. 
Saniflo system is environmentally friendly because they use less water than a standard toilet system. The saniflo upflushing toilet functions just like a primary sewage treatment system or secondary municipal sewage treatment system. When the solid enter the sewage system, it will become a liquid state and reduce the anaerobic bacteria activity.
Saniflo toilets are usually installed in bed and breakfast houses, restaurants and factories. It is also used in residential homes including bathrooms, loft conversions and garage conversions.