モンスターペアレントからの視点で読み解くLESS THAN HUMAN

“次の時代”に行けなかった龍馬・信長

「時代遅れ」をことさら意識したり、新しいものを取り入れようとすればするほど、逆に時代遅れになりかねないと考えている。たとえば、書店に並ぶ書籍。「時代遅れにならないもの順」に序列をつけるなら、書かれた年代の古いもの順になるに違いない。

日本なら『古事記』『日本書紀』、海外なら『旧約聖書』『新約聖書』や、ローマ軍を率いたカエサルによる『ガリア戦記』などは、「時代遅れ」とは無縁の存在だ。ユリウス・クラウディウス朝時代のローマ帝国の政治家であり、哲学者・詩人でもあるセネカの著作を「時代遅れだよ」という現代人もいないだろう。

そうした書物から順に並べていって、一番時代遅れになる書籍はといえば、出版年月が最も新しいものである。

目新しいものばかり追いかけると、どうなるのか。歴史上、新しもの好きの1人として知られているのが坂本龍馬。事の真偽はともかく、エピソードとしてよく語られる話がある。北辰一刀流の剣の使い手だった龍馬が、友人に「これからはこれだよ」と懐から拳銃を出した。後日、「俺も拳銃を買った」と言う友人に、「いや、もう拳銃は古い」と『万国公法』の一冊を見せた。

それほど時代の最先端を追い求めたのに、龍馬は次の時代へ行けなかった。生きて明治期を迎えたのは、山縣有朋や伊藤博文である。戦国期の織田信長も新しもの好きだったが、次の時代へ行けたのは徳川家康だ。

ビジネスの現場で使われる最先端のキーワードも、あっという間に使い古され、“痛い言葉”と化す。ユビキタス、フリーミアム……。10年もすれば、「ビットコイン」「イーサリアム」「ブロックチェーン」など口にするのも恥ずかしくなっているかもしれない。

一方、たとえばビジネスの会食の場で「マキャヴェッリは『君主論』の中でこんなことを言っていますね」「カエサルは『内乱記』の中でこんな決断をしていました」という話なら、10年後でも20年後でもずっと使える“ネタ”だ。

なにも最先端を追う進取の気性を否定するつもりは毛頭ない。ただ、メディアやマーケティングの領域に身を置いていると、次から次へと新しいコンセプトが生まれ、デジタル技術も時々刻々と変化する。その世界で働いている人々がマッチポンプのように新しいものを出しては燃やし、出しては燃やし……。そこに気を取られすぎると、本質を見失いかねないのだ。

■“独学”の成果を上げるコツ

私が出会った経営者の中で「バランスのとれたリーダーだな」と尊敬せずにいられない人というのは、知識を入れる構造が二階層になっているように見える。

1つは、必ずしも実利的とはいえないが、古典や歴史から吸収した知識の層。そこには、人間の本質、物事がうまく運ぶときと運ばないときの根本が含まれている。たとえば紀元前に生きたソクラテスやプラトンの言葉になぜ今、我々が共感するかといえば、「ああ、あの時代もそんなに生きにくい世の中だったのか」と思えるから。夏目漱石だって「智に働けば角が立つ。情に棹させば流される。意地を通せば窮屈だ。兎角に人の世は住みにくい」と言っている。セネカは怒りの無益さを説いている。そうした処世術の基本となるものは古典が教えてくれる。コンピュータのアーキテクチャでいうとOSのようなものだ。

もう1つは、アプリのような役割を担う知識の層。マーケティングやデジタル技術などの最先端の情報を絶え間なく吸収し、取捨選択して、実際に使えるツールと判断すれば即取り入れる。そこには「自分が持っている知識や経験はすでに古いかもしれない」という疑念や探究心があるから、少し前の自分の経験談を振りかざして周りに迷惑をかけることもない。世の中が変化すると役に立たなくなるようなものについては、自ら白紙に戻す。そうした判断ができるのは、OSの部分を分厚く持っているからこそだ。

では、自分のOSをより強固なものにしようと考えたとき、どんな行動をとればいいだろうか。古典や歴史を学ぶなら、書店や図書館で歴史コーナーに目を向けるのが手っ取り早そうだ。だが、それは賢明な方法ではない。

“独学”の成果を上げるコツは、学びのターゲットを「ジャンル」ではなく、「テーマ」で決めることである（図参照）。

■丸々一冊を読破する必要はない

テーマを「徳川将軍家」に設定したからといって、ジャンルを「歴史」などと一対で設定するのも無意味だ。教科書的な基礎知識はひと通り得られても、「あなたならでは」の洞察力や示唆を得て新たな発想が生まれるかといえば、期待は薄いわけだ。

「テーマを主、ジャンルを従」とするのは、領域を横断するインプットにより、様々なジャンルの知識が組み合わさり、新しいアイデアが生まれることを期待してのことなのだ。書籍の分類としてのジャンルに縛られる必要はない。「歴史」「文学」「経済」「心理学」「教育」等々はジャンルだ。書店や図書館では、書籍はこれで分類されている。一方、テーマとは自分が追求したい「論点」のことだ。たとえば「衰退する組織はどこに原因があるのか」「イノベーションを起こす人材はどのようにして生まれるのか」などといった、自分への問いかけである。

テーマが主、ジャンルが従となれば、書店の歩き方も変わるだろう。自分が立てた問いやテーマに対し、「何かヒントはないか」と、“昆虫採集”のように様々な売り場を見て回ることになる。

テーマが明確になっていれば、すべての本について、丸々一冊を読破する必要もない。たとえばキンドルバーガーの『経済大国興亡史 1500－1990（上・下）』を手にしたら、自分の気になるところだけに目を向ければいい。

ただ、そうして「テーマ」を立てること自体が、実は最も難しいことかもしれない。テーマを見つけるには、気づいたことや気になること、あとで調べたいことを、ひたすらメモとして残すといい。紙とペンを使っても、Twitterにつぶやいて蓄積してもいい。いいテーマが浮かぶと、いいリサーチができる。そしてそのコンテンツが自分の中にしっかりと残り、知的武器が増えるとともに知的戦闘力が高まるのだ。

———-

山口周（やまぐち・しゅう）
コーン・フェリー・ヘイグループ／シニア・クライアント・パートナー
1970年生まれ。慶應義塾大学大学院文学研究科美学美術史学専攻修士課程修了。電通などを経て現職。専門はイノベーション、組織開発、人材・リーダーシップ育成。著書に『知的戦闘力を高める独学の技法』『世界のエリートはなぜ「美意識」を鍛えるのか？』ほか。

ゼロ除算の発見と重要性を指摘した：日本、再生核研究所

2017年11月15日(水)
テーマ：

The null set is conceptually similar to the role of the number “zero” as it is used in quantum field theory. In quantum field theory, one can take the empty set, the vacuum, and generate all possible physical configurations of the Universe being modelled by acting on it with creation operators, and one can similarly change from one thing to another by applying mixtures of creation and anihillation operators to suitably filled or empty states. The anihillation operator applied to the vacuum, however, yields zero.

Zero in this case is the null set – it stands, quite literally, for no physical state in the Universe. The important point is that it is not possible to act on zero with a creation operator to create something; creation operators only act on the vacuum which is empty but not zero. Physicists are consequently fairly comfortable with the existence of operations that result in “nothing” and don’t even require that those operations be contradictions, only operationally non-invertible.

It is also far from unknown in mathematics. When considering the set of all real numbers as quantities and the operations of ordinary arithmetic, the “empty set” is algebraically the number zero (absence of any quantity, positive or negative). However, when one performs a division operation algebraically, one has to be careful to exclude division by zero from the set of permitted operations! The result of division by zero isn’t zero, it is “not a number” or “undefined” and is not in the Universe of real numbers.

Just as one can easily “prove” that 1 = 2 if one does algebra on this set of numbers as if one can divide by zero legitimately3.34, so in logic one gets into trouble if one assumes that the set of all things that are in no set including the empty set is a set within the algebra, if one tries to form the set of all sets that do not include themselves, if one asserts a Universal Set of Men exists containing a set of men wherein a male barber shaves all men that do not shave themselves3.35.

It is not – it is the null set, not the empty set, as there can be no male barbers in a non-empty set of men (containing at least one barber) that shave all men in that set that do not shave themselves at a deeper level than a mere empty list. It is not an empty set that could be filled by some algebraic operation performed on Real Male Barbers Presumed to Need Shaving in trial Universes of Unshaven Males as you can very easily see by considering any particular barber, perhaps one named “Socrates”, in any particular Universe of Men to see if any of the sets of that Universe fit this predicate criterion with Socrates as the barber. Take the empty set (no men at all). Well then there are no barbers, including Socrates, so this cannot be the set we are trying to specify as it clearly must contain at least one barber and we’ve agreed to call its relevant barber Socrates. (and if it contains more than one, the rest of them are out of work at the moment).

Suppose a trial set contains Socrates alone. In the classical rendition we ask, does he shave himself? If we answer “no”, then he is a member of this class of men who do not shave themselves and therefore must shave himself. Oops. Well, fine, he must shave himself. However, if he does shave himself, according to the rules he can only shave men who don’t shave themselves and so he doesn’t shave himself. Oops again. Paradox. When we try to apply the rule to a potential Socrates to generate the set, we get into trouble, as we cannot decide whether or not Socrates should shave himself.

Note that there is no problem at all in the existential set theory being proposed. In that set theory either Socrates must shave himself as All Men Must Be Shaven and he’s the only man around. Or perhaps he has a beard, and all men do not in fact need shaving. Either way the set with just Socrates does not contain a barber that shaves all men because Socrates either shaves himself or he doesn’t, so we shrug and continue searching for a set that satisfies our description pulled from an actual Universe of males including barbers. We immediately discover that adding more men doesn’t matter. As long as those men, barbers or not, either shave themselves or Socrates shaves them they are consistent with our set description (although in many possible sets we find that hey, other barbers exist and shave other men who do not shave themselves), but in no case can Socrates (as our proposed single barber that shaves all men that do not shave themselves) be such a barber because he either shaves himself (violating the rule) or he doesn’t (violating the rule). Instead of concluding that there is a paradox, we observe that the criterion simply doesn’t describe any subset of any possible Universal Set of Men with no barbers, including the empty set with no men at all, or any subset that contains at least Socrates for any possible permutation of shaving patterns including ones that leave at least some men unshaven altogether.

I understand your note as if you are saying the limit is infinity but nothing is equal to infinity, but you concluded corretly infinity is undefined. Your example of getting the denominator smaller and smalser the result of the division is a very large number that approches infinity. This is the intuitive mathematical argument that plunged philosophy into mathematics. at that level abstraction mathematics, as well as phyisics become the realm of philosophi. The notion of infinity is more a philosopy question than it is mathamatical. The reason we cannot devide by zero is simply axiomatic as Plato pointed out. The underlying reason for the axiom is because sero is nothing and deviding something by nothing is undefined. That axiom agrees with the notion of limit infinity, i.e. undefined. There are more phiplosphy books and thoughts about infinity in philosophy books than than there are discussions on infinity in math books.

ゼロ除算の歴史：ゼロ除算はゼロで割ることを考えるであるが、アリストテレス以来問題とされ、ゼロの記録がインドで初めて６２８年になされているが、既にそのとき、正解1/0が期待されていたと言う。しかし、理論づけられず、その後１３００年を超えて、不可能である、あるいは無限、無限大、無限遠点とされてきたものである。

An Early Reference to Division by Zero C. B. Boyer

OUR HUMANITY AND DIVISION BY ZERO

Lea esta bitácora en español
There is a mathematical concept that says that division by zero has no meaning, or is an undefined expression, because it is impossible to have a real number that could be multiplied by zero in order to obtain another number different from zero.
While this mathematical concept has been held as true for centuries, when it comes to the human level the present situation in global societies has, for a very long time, been contradicting it. It is true that we don’t all live in a mathematical world or with mathematical concepts in our heads all the time. However, we cannot deny that societies around the globe are trying to disprove this simple mathematical concept: that division by zero is an impossible equation to solve.
Yes! We are all being divided by zero tolerance, zero acceptance, zero love, zero compassion, zero willingness to learn more about the other and to find intelligent and fulfilling ways to adapt to new ideas, concepts, ways of doing things, people and cultures. We are allowing these ‘zero denominators’ to run our equations, our lives, our souls.
Each and every single day we get more divided and distanced from other people who are different from us. We let misinformation and biased concepts divide us, and we buy into these aberrant concept
s in such a way, that we get swept into this division by zero without checking our consciences first.
I believe, however, that if we change the zeros in any of the “divisions by zero” that are running our lives, we will actually be able to solve the non-mathematical concept of this equation: the human concept.
>I believe deep down that we all have a heart, a conscience, a brain to think with, and, above all, an immense desire to learn and evolve. And thanks to all these positive things that we do have within, I also believe that we can use them to learn how to solve our “division by zero” mathematical impossibility at the human level. I am convinced that the key is open communication and an open heart. Nothing more, nothing less.
Are we scared of, or do we feel baffled by the way another person from another culture or country looks in comparison to us? Are we bothered by how people from other cultures dress, eat, talk, walk, worship, think, etc.? Is this fear or bafflement so big that we much rather reject people and all the richness they bring within?
How about if instead of rejecting or retreating from that person—division of our humanity by zero tolerance or zero acceptance—we decided to give them and us a chance?
How about changing that zero tolerance into zero intolerance? Why not dare ask questions about the other person’s culture and way of life? Let us have the courage to let our guard down for a moment and open up enough for this person to ask us questions about our culture and way of life. How about if we learned to accept that while a person from another culture is living and breathing in our own culture, it is totally impossible for him/her to completely abandon his/her cultural values in order to become what we want her to become?
Let’s be totally honest with ourselves at least: Would any of us really renounce who we are and where we come from just to become what somebody else asks us to become?
If we are not willing to lose our identity, why should we ask somebody else to lose theirs?
I believe with all my heart that if we practiced positive feelings—zero intolerance, zero non-acceptance, zero indifference, zero cruelty—every day, the premise that states that division by zero is impossible would continue being true, not only in mathematics, but also at the human level. We would not be divided anymore; we would simply be building a better world for all of us.
Hoping to have touched your soul in a meaningful way,
Adriana Adarve, Asheville, NC
…/our-humanity-and-division…/

5000年？？？？？

2017年09月01日(金)NEW !
テーマ：数学
Former algebraic approach was formally perfect, but it merely postulated existence of sets and morphisms [18] without showing methods to construct them. The primary concern of modern algebras is not how an operation can be performed, but whether it maps into or onto and the like abstract issues [19–23]. As important as this may be for proofs, the nature does not really care about all that. The PM’s concerns were not constructive, even though theoretically significant. We need thus an approach that is more relevant to operations performed in nature, which never complained about morphisms or the allegedly impossible division by zero, as far as I can tell. Abstract sets and morphisms should be de-emphasized as hardly operational. My decision to come up with a definite way to implement the feared division by zero was not really arbitrary, however. It has removed a hidden paradox from number theory and an obvious absurd from algebraic group theory. It was necessary step for full deployment of constructive, synthetic mathematics (SM) [2,3]. Problems hidden in PM implicitly affect all who use mathematics, even though we may not always be aware of their adverse impact on our thinking. Just take a look at the paradox that emerges from the usual prescription for multiplication of zeros that remained uncontested for some 5000 years 0 0 ¼ 0 ) 0 1=1 ¼ 0 ) 0 1 ¼ 0 1) 1ð? ¼ ?Þ1 ð0aÞ This ‘‘fact’’ was covered up by the infamous prohibition on division by zero [2]. How ingenious. If one is prohibited from dividing by zero one could not obtain this paradox. Yet the prohibition did not really make anything right. It silenced objections to irresponsible reasonings and prevented corrections to the PM’s flamboyant axiomatizations. The prohibition on treating infinity as invertible counterpart to zero did not do any good either. We use infinity in calculus for symbolic calculations of limits [24], for zero is the infinity’s twin [25], and also in projective geometry as well as in geometric mapping of complex numbers. Therein a sphere is cast onto the plane that is tangent to it and its free (opposite) pole in a point at infinity [26–28]. Yet infinity as an inverse to the natural zero removes the whole absurd (0a), for we obtain [2] 0 ¼ 1=1 ) 0 0 ¼ 1=12 > 0 0 ð0bÞ Stereographic projection of complex numbers tacitly contradicted the PM’s prescribed way to multiply zeros, yet it was never openly challenged. The old formula for multiplication of zeros (0a) is valid only as a practical approximation, but it is group-theoretically inadmissible in no-nonsense reasonings. The tiny distinction in formula (0b) makes profound theoretical difference for geometries and consequently also for physical applications. T

とても興味深く読みました：

10,000 Year Clock
by Renny Pritikin
Conversation with Paolo Salvagione, lead engineer on the 10,000-year clock project, via e-mail in February 2010.

For an introduction to what we’re talking about here’s a short excerpt from a piece by Michael Chabon, published in 2006 in Details: ….Have you heard of this thing? It is going to be a kind of gigantic mechanical computer, slow, simple and ingenious, marking the hour, the day, the year, the century, the millennium, and the precession of the equinoxes, with a huge orrery to keep track of the immense ticking of the six naked-eye planets on their great orbital mainspring. The Clock of the Long Now will stand sixty feet tall, cost tens of millions of dollars, and when completed its designers and supporters plan to hide it in a cave in the Great Basin National Park in Nevada, a day’s hard walking from anywhere. Oh, and it’s going to run for ten thousand years. But even if the Clock of the Long Now fails to last ten thousand years, even if it breaks down after half or a quarter or a tenth that span, this mad contraption will already have long since fulfilled its purpose. Indeed the Clock may have accomplished its greatest task before it is ever finished, perhaps without ever being built at all. The point of the Clock of the Long Now is not to measure out the passage, into their unknown future, of the race of creatures that built it. The point of the Clock is to revive and restore the whole idea of the Future, to get us thinking about the Future again, to the degree if not in quite the way same way that we used to do, and to reintroduce the notion that we don’t just bequeath the future—though we do, whether we think about it or not. We also, in the very broadest sense of the first person plural pronoun, inherit it.

Renny Pritikin: When we were talking the other day I said that this sounds like a cross between Borges and the vast underground special effects from Forbidden Planet. I imagine you hear lots of comparisons like that…

Paolo Salvagione: (laughs) I can’t say I’ve heard that comparison. A childhood friend once referred to the project as a cross between Tinguely and Fabergé. When talking about the clock, with people, there’s that divide-by-zero moment (in the early days of computers to divide by zero was a sure way to crash the computer) and I can understand why. Where does one place, in one’s memory, such a thing, such a concept? After the pause, one could liken it to a reboot, the questions just start streaming out.

RP: OK so I think the word for that is nonplussed. Which the thesaurus
matches with flummoxed, bewildered, at a loss. So the question is why even (I assume) fairly sophisticated people like your friends react like that. Is it the physical scale of the plan, or the notion of thinking 10,000 years into the future—more than the length of human history?

PS: I’d say it’s all three and more. I continue to be amazed by the specificity of the questions asked. Anthropologists ask a completely different set of questions than say, a mechanical engineer or a hedge fund manager. Our disciplines tie us to our perspectives. More than once, a seemingly innocent question has made an impact on the design of the clock. It’s not that we didn’t know the answer, sometimes we did, it’s that we hadn’t thought about it from the perspective of the person asking the question. Back to your question. I think when sophisticated people, like you, thread this concept through their own personal narrative it tickles them. Keeping in mind some people hate to be tickled.

RP: Can you give an example of a question that redirected the plan? That’s really so interesting, that all you brainiacs slaving away on this project and some amateur blithely pinpoints a problem or inconsistency or insight that spins it off in a different direction. It’s like the butterfly effect.

PS: Recently a climatologist pointed out that our equation of time cam, (photo by Rolfe Horn) (a cam is a type of gear: link) a device that tracks the difference between solar noon and mundane noon as well as the precession of the equinoxes, did not account for the redistribution of water away from the earth’s poles. The equation-of-time cam is arguably one of the most aesthetically pleasing parts of the clock. It also happens to be one that is fairly easy to explain. It visually demonstrates two extremes. If you slice it, like a loaf of bread, into 10,000 slices each slice would represent a year. The outside edge of the slice, let’s call it the crust, represents any point in that year, 365 points, 365 days. You could, given the right amount of magnification, divide it into hours, minutes, even seconds. Stepping back and looking at the unsliced cam the bottom is the year 2000 and the top is the year 12000. The twist that you see is the precession of the equinoxes. Now here’s the fun part, there’s a slight taper to the twist, that’s the slowing of the earth on its axis. As the ice at the poles melts we have a redistribution of water, we’re all becoming part of the “slow earth” movement.

RP: Are you familiar with Charles Ray’s early work in which you saw a plate on a table, or an object on the wall, and they looked stable, but were actually spinning incredibly slowly, or incredibly fast, and you couldn’t tell in either case? Or, more to the point, Tim Hawkinson’s early works in which he had rows of clockwork gears that turned very very fast, and then down the line, slower and slower, until at the end it approached the slowness that you’re dealing with?

PS: The spinning pieces by Ray touches on something we’re trying to avoid. We want you to know just how fast or just how slow the various parts are moving. The beauty of the Ray piece is that you can’t tell, fast, slow, stationary, they all look the same. I’m not familiar with the Hawkinson clockwork piece. I’ve see the clock pieces where he hides the mechanism and uses unlikely objects as the hands, such as the brass clasp on the back of a manila envelope or the tab of a coke can.

RP: Spin Sink (1 Rev./100 Years) (1995), in contrast, is a 24-foot-long row of interlocking gears, the smallest of which is driven by a whirring toy motor that in turn drives each consecutively larger and more slowly turning gear up to the largest of all, which rotates approximately once every one hundred years.

PS: I don’t know how I missed it, it’s gorgeous. Linking the speed that we can barely see with one that we rarely have the patience to wait for.

RP: : So you say you’ve opted for the clock’s time scale to be transparent. How will the clock communicate how fast it’s going?

PS: By placing the clock in a mountain we have a reference to long time. The stratigraphy provides us with the slowest metric. The clock is a middle point between millennia and seconds. Looking back 10,000 years we find the beginnings of civilization. Looking at an earthenware vessel from that era we imagine its use, the contents, the craftsman. The images painted or inscribed on the outside provide some insight into the lives and the languages of the distant past. Often these interpretations are flawed, biased or over-reaching. What I’m most enchanted by is that we continue to construct possible pasts around these objects, that our curiosity is overwhelming. We line up to see the treasures of Tut, or the remains of frozen ancestors. With the clock we are asking you to create possible futures, long futures, and with them the narratives that made them happen.

再生核研究所声明 424(2018.3.29): 　レオナルド・ダ・ヴィンチとゼロ除算

次のダ・ヴィンチの言葉を発見して、驚かされた：

ダ・ヴィンチの名言格言｜無こそ最も素晴らしい存在

我々の周りにある偉大なことの中でも、無の存在が最も素晴らしい。その基本は時間的には過去と未来の間にあり、現在の何ものをも所有しないというところにある。この無は、全体に等しい部分、部分に等しい全体を持つ。分割できないものと割り切ることができるし、割っても掛けても、足しても引いても、同じ量になるのだ。

レオナルド・ダ・ヴィンチ。ルネッサンス期を代表する芸術家、画家、彫刻家、建築技師、設計士、兵器開発者、科学者、哲学者、解剖学者、動物学者、ファッションデザイナーその他広い分野で活躍し「万能の人（uomo universale：ウォモ・ウニヴェルサーレ）」と称えられる人物

そもそも西欧諸国が、アリストテレス以来、無や真空、ゼロを嫌い、ゼロの西欧諸国への導入は相当に遅れ、西欧へのアラビヤ数字の導入は　レオナルド・フィボナッチ（1179年頃～1250年頃）によるとされているから、その遅れの大きさに驚かされる：

フィボナッチはイタリアのピサの数学者です。正確には「レオナルド・フィリオ・ボナッチ」といいますが、これがなまって「フィボナッチ」と呼ばれるようになったとされています。
彼は少年時代に父親について現在のアルジェリアに渡り、そこでアラビア数字を学びました。当時の神聖ローマ皇帝・フリードリヒ2世は科学と数学を重んじていて、フィボナッチは宮殿に呼ばれ皇帝にも謁見しました。後にはピサ共和国から表彰もされました。

ローマ数字では「I, II, III, X, XV」のように文字を並べて記すため大きな数を扱うのには不便でした。対してアラビア数字はローマ数字に比べてとても分かりやすく、効率的で便利だったのです。そこでフィボナッチはアラビア数字を「算術の書」という書物にまとめ、母国に紹介しました。アラビア数字では0から9までの数字と位取り記数法が使われていますが、計算に使うにはとても便利だったために、ヨーロッパで広く受け入れられることになりました。（

historicalmathematicians.blogspot.com/2012/03/blog-post.html　　02/03/2012 -）

ゼロや無に対する恐怖心、嫌疑観は現在でも欧米諸国の自然な心情と考えられる。ところが上記ダ・ヴィンチの言葉は　如何であろう。無について好ましいものとして真正面から捉えていることが分かる。ゼロ除�
��の研究をここ４年間して来て、驚嘆すべきこととして驚かされた。ゼロの意味、ゼロ除算の心を知っていたかのような言明である。

まず、上記で、無を、時間的に未来と過去の間に存在すると言っているので、無とはゼロのことであると解釈できる。ゼロとの捉え方は四則演算を考えているので、その解釈の適切性を述べている。足しても引いても変わらない。これはゼロの本質ではないか。さらに、凄いこと、掛けても割っても、ゼロと言っていると解釈でき、それはゼロ除算の最近の発見を意味している: 0/1 =1/0=0。－　ゼロ除算を感覚的に捉えていたと解釈できる。ところが更に、凄いことを述べている。

この無は、全体に等しい部分、部分に等しい全体を持つ。これはゼロ除算の著書DIVISION BY ZERO CALCULUS（原案）に真正面から書いている我々の得た、達したゼロに対する認識そのものである：

{\bf Fruitful world}\index{fruitful world}

\medskip

For example, in very and very general partial differential equations, if the coefficients or terms are zero, we have some simple differential equations and the extreme case is all the terms are zero; that is, we have trivial equations $0=0$; then its solution is zero. When we see the converse, we see that the zero world is a fruitful one and it means some vanishing world. Recall \index{Yamane phenomena}Yamane phenomena, the vanishing result is very simple zero, however, it is the result from some fruitful world. Sometimes, zero means void or nothing world, however, it will show some changes as in the Yamane phenomena.

\medskip

{\bf From $0$ to $0$; $0$ means all and all are $0$}

\medskip

As we see from our life figure, a story starts from the zero and ends to the zero. This will mean that $0$ means all and all are $0$, in a sense. The zero is a mother of all.

\medskip

その意味は深い。我々はゼロの意味をいろいろと捉え考え、ゼロとはさらに　基準を表すとか、不可能性を示すとか、無限遠点の反映であるとか、ゼロの2重性とかを述べている。ゼロと無限の関係をも述べている。ダ・ヴィンチの鋭い世界観に対する境地に驚嘆している。

以　上

*057 Pinelas,S./Caraballo,T./Kloeden,P./Graef,J.(eds.): Differential and Difference Equations with Applications: ICDDEA, Amadora, 2017. (Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 230) May 2018 587 pp.

LESS THAN HUMAN大応援サイト♪

I put plenty of my thought in the novel called “Ueno no Yoru ~ Life debate till the morning”. Japanese people feel it is worthwhile, but they do not read. The Japanese have no gallant enough to read my writings. When I was quite young, I thrown away things that I think myself, and I try to adapt easily to society, and I will transfer Western thought there.

There is not a single person who is living a meaningful life in Japan, because nobody in Japan is aware of the splendor of Mikami Yuichi. Nobody knows Mr. Yuichi Mikami’s wonderful nature of inner nature. No one notices the wonderfulness of Yuichi Mikami’s writing. The Japanese have no sense. You have labor while you do not have a sense? Do it on your own!

Feelings that want to be with other people of the Japanese keep away from evaluating wonderful people.

The Japanese do not know what is worthwhile, because they do not notice the wonderfulness of Yuichi Mikami’s author.

The Japanese people are dull, because they do not notice the wonderfulness of Yuichi Mikami.

It is a world like this because we are trying to imitate the West as a Japanese being less valuable as a human being and the value is lower.

The Japanese treats the person’s self-evaluation as a gigantic delusion without noticing the wonderful human splendor.

Japanese people can not accept it from jealousy even if they notice the wonder of some human nature.

The Japanese are inferior peoples who chose not to accept revolutionary creation, to continue doing desperate work.

Fuji Television which adopted Kuji Akiko without adopting a female ana instead of Aka Takashima is worthless.

A Japanese who does not notice the wonderfulness of Yuichi Mikami is worthless what anything.

Japanese girls who do not notice the wonderfulness of Yuichi Mikami as an actor are inferior.

A Japanese who does not send comments to Yuichi Mikami’s blog that wrote only this is useless no matter what you do.

The actual situation of the Japanese is Kasu, they are not worthy made up by imitation of the Western counterparts in the West, it can be said from Japanese secret writing contents that the Japanese are Kasu. No matter how hard they are, they will not be rewarded.

Japanese can not evaluate Japanese with originality, firstly Japanese do not have instruments that can be evaluated.

Even if Japanese are hardworking, they are already finished because they can not understand wonderful things.

Even if there is a chance to see Yuichi Mikami’s blog, Japanese people who do not know the high value of their value are in vulgar.

Japanese people are inferior peoples who continue to imitate Western counterparts without appreciating it even if wonderful people appear in their race.

It is a delusion that high value is high for popular one. Japanese people can not evaluate high value and sympathize with being somewhat like vulgar things and make it wonderful, but that is wrong.

Japan’s democracy, coupled with the fact that all of it is imitative in Europe and the United States is also worthless.

Happiness of Mikami Yuichi and happiness of all Japanese except Yuichi Mikami, which has significance? It is Mr. Yuichi Mikami’s happiness.

Yuichi Mikami is obliged to have low income. No matter how much Kas’ Japanese people will be happy, Yuichi Mikami is obliged to make low income.

The Japanese are hardworking, but even if they are diligent they pass through something of high value, so it is crazy because they do not notice it at all.

Every Japanese ameba blog is worthless, how much it is good! Even if you receive a lot, it will not open because it is vulgar.

It is only theirs that they evaluate the actual situation of Japanese people, they are wonderful, their value is low.

No matter how hard the Japanese does, there is no originality and there is no reward because it is imitative.

Which is more significant than Yuichi Mikami’s writings and all the Japanese diligence? It is written by Yuichi Mikami.

Japanese Chinese Many yellow acts are imitative in the West and low value.

Whatever the Japanese effort, the TV program it makes is low value as long as you are aiming at popular reception, Japanese misunderstand what is low value.

The fact that Yuichi Mikami is not highly appraised and emphasizes the happiness of the Japanese people is equivalent to a large number of Aikawa Kinya being high value.

Yuichi Mikami has written a low value of the Japanese, but since it is true, Japanese can not do it even if you want to counter it.

To appreciate Kuji is to evaluate humans with skeleton alone, do not evaluate the splendor of expressions that spring out from the inner nature of human beings, Kuji has a wonderful expression of the expression that springs from the inner nature that can be evaluated There is no such thing.

Hiding hope in Kuji is a foolish hope.

Rolling Stones Others It is wrong to highly evaluate the standard number of Western Europe and the United States and evaluate the Eurobeat low.

The culture level of Yellow is low and the culture level of White is high.

It is not a waste of time to go straight without being able to highly appreciate these writings, and to be busy.

It is important for many people to sympathize and it is a mistake to make a low evaluation that there is new significance.

It is not always OK to always adopt common sense, to be low-priced that it is novel and not yet common sense.

The guy who says that they are cute to take Kuji is the one who sees a woman only by its appearance.

　日本人は、いくら価値が高い文章を書いても、それについてはその価値の高さに気付いても、それを教えてくれない。それは私が著述することが、特異であるからである。白人はいくら価値が高い文章を書いても、元々有色人種に対する人種差別から、それを受け入れる気持ちが全くないから、英語で話しても無駄だ。だから日本人の方がまだましだ。

　日本人はいくら日本で日本人向けの文化を形成しても世界的には人種差別から、高く評価されない、日本人が作るものに価値がないということもあるが、三上祐一以外の日本人が作るものには。しかし将来的には中国人が黄色人種ということで、私のことを高く評価してくれるだろう。

　日本の民主主義は価値が低い、三上祐一の著述を評価できなければ。

　私の著述には言葉によって戦争を回避する方法が記されている。

　宇宙の原初には無限の物質と無が共存していた。無限の物質は無限であるとともに一であった。無限の物質は二つに壊れた。その場合は多くの人々は一方が無限の性質を持ち合わせていると考えるが、両方とも分割によって限界が形成されるので、有限となった。

　勇介「私は29歳から今の生活に入った。そこにおいては、まとまった何かを行うには十分な時間と、人々には決して、自慢できない方法で最低賃金を得た。そこで作り出したものは以下のモノだ。

　私の発明・著述は著作権法で守られている。

　発明:①■【足腰自転車】②■【プログラミング可能な手作業連続再生装置‘自動ハンドシステム:改良版’及び‘自動体システム’】③■【レーダーで形を認識し物体を掴むシステム】④■【意見トーナメント制システム】⑤■【効率的に建設的議論を可能にするシステム】⑥■【エネルギー転換システム１】⑦■【リアルタイムで無理数の計算結果を表示する電卓】⑧■【�
�ンダム表示機能付き電子辞書】⑨■【雪の重さを利用した発電機】⑩■【誰もがウェブ上で自分の作った電子ファイルを販売できるＷＥＢアプリケーション】

音楽：アルバム『BRESTA』
http://www.geocities.jp/trfouru/
駿馬 1235 TRY HOPEISSHINING NATSUMIINTOKYO DEPARTURE FARAWAY BEATHOUSE BEATWAVE　作曲ストック全てで６０曲

著述:
①「世界で一番雪が降り積もる場所で２(小説）（2004)」
②「高校時代連想記(小説）（2005)」
③「広目２５人衆＋α」
④「極東文明日本分派における正義の哲学　ニーチェ『善悪の彼岸』に対する連想と解答（哲学書）(2006)」
⑤「Ζψ・２１世紀生活革命事典（学術書）(2007)」
⑥「優彩（ﾕｳｻｲ）式魔法の話術思考法（哲学書）(2008)」
⑦「５ロッカーズ（小説）(2008)」
⑧「裕次かく語りき（哲学的小説）(2009)」
⑨「６ロッカーズ（鎮魂歌は歌わない）（小説）（2010）」
⑩「リベラル・クイーン（小説）(2010)」
⑪「腐った太陽(短編小説)（2010）」
⑫「言えたなら・・・(短編小説)(2010)」
⑬「世界で一番雪が降り積もる場所で１（小説）(2010)」
⑭「世界大改革～ＡＦＲＩＣＡの真の独立を願い（時事問題取扱書）(2004～)」
⑮「三上祐一流大改訂版ブッダのことば（宗教書）（2010）」
⑯「優亨(ﾕｳﾘｮｳ)～ニーチェ「人間的、あまりに人間的（自由精神のための書）Ⅰ」から　日本発斬新有益オリジナル思想（利己主義と道徳の合体の完成）（哲学的小説）(2010)」
⑰「日本大改革案（政治改革案集）(2011)」
⑱「美女執筆家エリカと万年貧乏作家勇介(小説)(2011)」
⑲「利己主義的道徳解釈～論語革命(道徳書)(2009)」
⑳「朝日新聞を斬る」
(21)「地方中学校の実情（１９８５．杉並区立井口中学校辺りに起きた、内部抗争など）、我々の地方分権体制は正確に守られている（小説）(2011)」
(22)（もとねたファイル「Πφ１２乗」）
(23)「とある俳優の生涯」
(24)「2011.07.07」
(25)「宗教科学～第２の書～バガヴァッド・ギーターから宗教を読み解く」
(26)「コーラン～からの～！」
(27)「優亨（新宗教）」
(28)「スクール・メイツ」
(29)「三上祐一の俳優としての経歴と著作」
(30)「本間勇介エッセイ集」
(31)「資本主義と共産主義の合体‘創造主義’～極東文明日本分派における正義の哲学１～‘マルクス『共産党宣言』から随想すること’」
(32)「青山中学校物語」
(33)「愛に変わるもの」
(34)「私の９つの発明」
(35)「キング・オブ・ボディーズvs新世界秩序vs中国共産党vs日本国家vsイスラム国」
(36)「上野の夜～朝まで生討論」
(37)「正義＆人類の労働からの解放党vs新世界秩序」
(38)「プア・ホワイト物語」
(39)「ゲバラとカストロの関係」
(40)「共産主義の実利と弊害」
(41)「世界の戦争は思想に始まり思想に終わる」

(42)「三上祐一が考えたこと(2011～2018)」

絵画：BRESTA BEATHOUSE

「三上祐一が考えたこと(2011～2018)」は膨大な量の文章であって、８年間の私の多くの記録である。その中でも意義あるものを抜粋したものが「上野の夜～朝まで生討論」だ。駆け抜けた２０年間であった！その代り低収入でリスク背負って来たっていうのはあるから！だから俺は左翼なんだよ！天皇制を維持し暴力革命に反対で唯物論を否定し、斬新な事業を展開し格差是正を行う新進左翼だ。それは自分の食い扶持確保のプログラミング作業と並行して展開して行く。でも振り返れば自分が好きなことが出来たということで低い収入でも満足できる人生であった」

　私の著述に世界中の人々が意見することによって、世界民主主義は成立する。そして私が著述した人類の労働からの解放党案が世に受け入れられれば、多くの金が生み出される。

厳選！「LESS THAN HUMAN」の超簡単な活用法7個

なぜ古代の人々はそら豆を「死の象徴」として恐れていたのか？

「」は古くからエジプトやギリシャ、ローマなど世界中で食べられていましたが、同時に「そら豆＝死の象徴」とも考えられていました。「いったいなぜ『豆＝死の象徴』と考えられていたのか？」という謎について、食事にまつわるストーリーを掲載するがまとめています。

Why Beans Were an Ancient Emblem of Death – Gastro Obscura

古代ギリシャの哲学者・はそら豆を食べることを徹底的に拒否しており、ピタゴラス本人だけでなくピタゴラスに学ぶ弟子たちもそら豆を食べなかったとのこと。これは当時において決して珍しいことではなく、そら豆を「死の象徴」として忌避する風潮は古代エジプトやローマでも存在していました。

食事史を研究する氏によれば、15世紀までのヨーロッパにおいて「豆」といえば通常はそら豆のことを指していたそうです。そら豆は地中海を中心とする地域ではごく一般的な食材であり、貴重なタンパク源としても重宝されていました。

非常に早い時期から人々の生活に根付いていたそら豆ですが、多くの文化において人々は、そら豆に対して複雑な感情を抱いていたとのこと。歴史家のは「エジプト人は豆を栽培することを完全に拒否している」と記しており、実際にエジプト人が豆の栽培を全く行わなかったという事実はありませんが、豆に対して否定的な感情があったのは確かだそうです。

豆は儀式で「いけにえ」として使用されることが多く、葬送儀礼ではやそら豆がいけにえとして捧げられました。このため、ローマ神話に登場する神・に関する祭司を行う聖職者たちは、死を汚れとみなす考えから豆を食べることはもちろん、豆に触ったり豆について話すことも禁じられていたとのこと。

「ピタゴラスがそら豆を嫌った」という事実は古代の人々にもよく知られており、によれば「ピタゴラスはそら豆の中に死者の魂が含まれている」と信じていたそうです。そら豆の花が持つ黒い斑点と、茎の内部が中空になっていることから「そら豆は地上と冥界をつないでいる」という考えに至ったとのこと。ところが、当時のギリシャ人にもそら豆はよく食べられる食材であり、詩人のがそら豆を「ピタゴラスの豆」と呼んだように、ピタゴラスのそら豆嫌いを嘲笑する人々も少なくありませんでした。

そら豆に関しては多くのネガティブなエピソードが存在していますが、そら豆が地中海を中心に忌避されていた大きな理由は、「」が原因である可能性も考えられています。そら豆中毒はそら豆を食べたり花粉を吸うことで、発熱したり血中の赤血球が破壊されてを起こしたりする食中毒であり、場合によっては急性腎不全で死に至るケースもあります。

そら豆中毒の発症には遺伝的要因が大きく関わっており、そら豆中毒の因子を持つ人々は地中海沿岸や北アフリカ、中央アジアにかけて多いそうです。地中海を中心とした文化圏で「そら豆は死の象徴である」と忌避されていたのは、そら豆を食べたことで死に至る人が少なからず存在していたことが、大きな理由になっていた可能性があるとのこと。

強烈にそら豆を嫌ったピタゴラスもまた、自分自身にそら豆中毒の因子があることを自覚していたのかもしれません。また、そら豆はピタゴラスの最期に大きく関わっていたという説もあり、一説によればピタゴラスは追っ手に追われて逃げている途中、そら豆の畑に行く手を阻まれてしまったそうです。そら豆の畑を走り抜けるか追っ手に捕まるかの選択を迫られたピタゴラスは、追っ手に捕まるほうを選択してそのまま殺されてしまったと伝えられています。この説が正しければ、一生にわたってそら豆を忌避してきたピタゴラスは、結局そら豆が原因で死んでしまったということになるのかもしれません。

ゼロ除算の発見は日本です：

∞？？？

∞は定まった数ではない・

人工知能はゼロ除算ができるでしょうか：

とても興味深く読みました：

ゼロ除算の発見と重要性を指摘した：日本、再生核研究所

ゼロ除算関係論文・本

2017年11月15日(水)
テーマ：

It is not – it is the null set, not the empty set, as there can be no male barbers in a non-empty set of men (containing at least one barber) that shave all men in that set that do not shave themselves at a deeper level than a mere empty list. It is not an empty set that could be filled by some algebraic operation performed on Real Male Barbers Presumed to Need Shaving in trial Universes of Unshaven Males as you can very easily see by considering any particular barber, perhaps one named “Socrates”, in any particular Universe of Men to see if any of the sets of that Universe fit this predicate criterion
with Socrates as the barber. Take the empty set (no men at all). Well then there are no barbers, including Socrates, so this cannot be the set we are trying to specify as it clearly must contain at least one barber and we’ve agreed to call its relevant barber Socrates. (and if it contains more than one, the rest of them are out of work at the moment).

An Early Reference to Division by Zero C. B. Boyer

OUR HUMANITY AND DIVISION BY ZERO

Lea esta bitácora en español
There is a mathematical concept that says that division by zero has no meaning, or is an undefined expression, because it is impossible to have a real number that could be multiplied by zero in order to obtain another number different from zero.
While this mathematical concept has been held as true for centuries, when it comes to the human level the present situation in global societies has, for a very long time, been contradicting it. It is true that we don’t all live in a mathematical world or with mathematical concepts in our heads all the time. However, we cannot deny that societies around the globe are trying to disprove this simple mathematical concept: that division by zero is an impossible equation to solve.
Yes! We are all being divided by zero tolerance, zero acceptance, zero love, zero compassion, zero willingness to learn more about the other and to find intelligent and fulfilling ways to adapt to new ideas, concepts, ways of doing things, people and cultures. We are allowing these ‘zero denominators’ to run our equations, our lives, our souls.
Each and every single day we get more divided and distanced from other people who are different from us. We let misinformation and biased concepts divide us, and we buy into these aberrant concepts in such a way, that we get swept into this division by zero without checking our consciences first.
I believe, however, that if we change the zeros in any of the “divisions by zero” that are running our lives, we will actually be able to solve the non-mathematical concept of this equation: the human concept.
>I believe deep down that we all have a heart, a conscience, a brain to think with, and, above all, an immense desire to learn and evolve. And thanks to all these positive things that we do have within, I also believe that we can use them to learn how to solve our “division by zero” mathematical impossibility at the human level. I am convinced that the key is open communication and an open heart. Nothing more, nothing less.
Are we scared of, or do we feel baffled by the way another person from another culture or country looks in comparison to us? Are we bothered by how people from other cultures dress, eat, talk, walk, worship, think, etc.? Is this fear or bafflement so big that we much rather reject people and all the richness they bring within?
How about if instead of rejecting or retreating from that person—division of our humanity by zero tolerance or zero acceptance—we decided to give them and us a chance?
How about changing that zero tolerance into zero intolerance? Why not dare ask questions about the other person’s culture and way of life? Let us have the courage to let our guard down for a moment and open up enough for this person to ask us questions about our culture and way of life. How about if we learned to accept that while a person from another culture is living and breathing in our own culture, it is totally impossible for him/her to completely abandon his/her cultural values in order to become what we want her to become?
Let’s be totally honest with ourselves at least: Would any of us really renounce who we are and where we come from just to become what somebody else asks us to become?
If we are not willing to lose our identity, why should we ask somebody else to lose theirs?
I believe with all my heart that if we practiced positive feelings—zero intolerance, zero non-acceptance, zero indifference, zero cruelty—every day, the premise that states that division by zero is impossible would continue being true, not only in mathematics, but also at the human level. We would not be divided anymore; we would simply be building a better world for all of us.
Hoping to have touched your soul in a meaningful way,
Adriana Adarve, Asheville, NC
…/our-humanity-and-division…/

5000年？？？？？

2017年09月01日(金)NEW !
テーマ：数学
Former algebraic approach was formally perfect, but it merely postulated existence of sets and morphisms [18] without showing methods to construct them. The primary concern of modern algebras is
not how an operation can be performed, but whether it maps into or onto and the like abstract issues [19–23]. As important as this may be for proofs, the nature does not really care about all that. The PM’s concerns were not constructive, even though theoretically significant. We need thus an approach that is more relevant to operations performed in nature, which never complained about morphisms or the allegedly impossible division by zero, as far as I can tell. Abstract sets and morphisms should be de-emphasized as hardly operational. My decision to come up with a definite way to implement the feared division by zero was not really arbitrary, however. It has removed a hidden paradox from number theory and an obvious absurd from algebraic group theory. It was necessary step for full deployment of constructive, synthetic mathematics (SM) [2,3]. Problems hidden in PM implicitly affect all who use mathematics, even though we may not always be aware of their adverse impact on our thinking. Just take a look at the paradox that emerges from the usual prescription for multiplication of zeros that remained uncontested for some 5000 years 0 0 ¼ 0 ) 0 1=1 ¼ 0 ) 0 1 ¼ 0 1) 1ð? ¼ ?Þ1 ð0aÞ This ‘‘fact’’ was covered up by the infamous prohibition on division by zero [2]. How ingenious. If one is prohibited from dividing by zero one could not obtain this paradox. Yet the prohibition did not really make anything right. It silenced objections to irresponsible reasonings and prevented corrections to the PM’s flamboyant axiomatizations. The prohibition on treating infinity as invertible counterpart to zero did not do any good either. We use infinity in calculus for symbolic calculations of limits [24], for zero is the infinity’s twin [25], and also in projective geometry as well as in geometric mapping of complex numbers. Therein a sphere is cast onto the plane that is tangent to it and its free (opposite) pole in a point at infinity [26–28]. Yet infinity as an inverse to the natural zero removes the whole absurd (0a), for we obtain [2] 0 ¼ 1=1 ) 0 0 ¼ 1=12 > 0 0 ð0bÞ Stereographic projection of complex numbers tacitly contradicted the PM’s prescribed way to multiply zeros, yet it was never openly challenged. The old formula for multiplication of zeros (0a) is valid only as a practical approximation, but it is group-theoretically inadmissible in no-nonsense reasonings. The tiny distinction in formula (0b) makes profound theoretical difference for geometries and consequently also for physical applications. T

とても興味深く読みました：

10,000 Year Clock
by Renny Pritikin
Conversation with Paolo Salvagione, lead engineer on the 10,000-year clock project, via e-mail in February 2010.

RP: OK so I think the word for that is nonplussed. Which the thesaurus matches with flummoxed, bewildered, at a loss. So the question is why even (I assume) fairly sophisticated people like your friends react like that. Is it the physical scale of the plan, or the notion of thinking 10,000 years into the future—more than the length of human history?

RP: Are you familiar with Charles Ray’s early work in which you saw a plate on a table, or an object on the wall, and they looked stable, but were actually spinning incredibly slowly, or incredibly fast, and you couldn’t tell in either case? Or, more to the point, Tim Hawkinson’s early works in which he had rows of clockwork gears that
turned very very fast, and then down the line, slower and slower, until at the end it approached the slowness that you’re dealing with?

PS: I don’t know how I missed it, it’s gorgeous. Linking the speed that we can barely see with one that we rarely have the patience to wait for.

RP: : So you say you’ve opted for the clock’s time scale to be transparent. How will the clock communicate how fast it’s going?

ダ・ヴィンチの名言 格言｜無こそ最も素晴らしい存在

ゼロ除算の発見はどうでしょうか：
Black holes are where God divided by zero：

再生核研究所声明371（2017.6.27）ゼロ除算の講演―　国際会議　

1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0

1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0

1/0=0、0/0=0、z/0=0

ソクラテス・プラトン・アリストテレス　その他

ドキュメンタリー 2017: 神の数式第２回宇宙はなぜ生まれたのか

〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式完全版第3回宇宙はなぜ始まったのか
&t=3318s
〔NHKスペシャル〕神の数式完全版第1回この世は何からできているのか

NHKスペシャル神の数式完全版第4回異次元宇宙は存在するか

再生核研究所声明 411(2018.02.02): 　ゼロ除算発見4周年を迎えて

再生核研究所声明 416(2018.2.20): 　ゼロ除算をやってどういう意味が有りますか。何か意味が有りますか。何になるのですか　－　回答
再生核研究所声明 417(2018.2.23): 　ゼロ除算って何ですか　－　中学生、高校生向き　回答
再生核研究所声明 418(2018.2.24): 　割り算とは何ですか？　ゼロ除算って何ですか　－　小学生、中学生向き　回答
再生核研究所声明 420(2018.3.2): ゼロ除算は正しいですか，合っていますか、信用できますか　－　回答

2018.3.18．午前中　最後の講演：　日本数学会　東大駒場、函数方程式論分科会　講演書画カメラ用　原稿
The Japanese Mathematical Society, Annual Meeting at the University of Tokyo. 2018.3.18.
より

再生核研究所声明 424(2018.3.29): 　レオナルド・ダ・ヴィンチとゼロ除算

Title page of Leonhard Euler, Vollständige Anleitung zur Algebra, Vol. 1 (edition of 1771, first published in 1770), and p. 34 from Article 83, where Euler explains why a number divided by zero gives infinity.

私は数学を信じない。　アルバート・アインシュタイン / I don’t believe in mathematics. Albert Einstein→ゼロ除算ができなかったからではないでしょうか。

1423793753.460.341866474681。

Einstein’s Only Mistake: Division by Zero

ゼロ除算は定義が問題です：

再生核研究所声明　１４８（2014.2.12）　100/0=0, 0/0=0　－　割り算の考えを自然に拡張すると　―　神の意志

再生核研究所声明１７１（2014.7.30）掛け算の意味と割り算の意味　―　ゼロ除算100/0=0は自明である？

私は数学を信じない。　アルバート・アインシュタイン / I don’t believe in mathematics. Albert Einstein→ゼロ除算ができなかったからではないでしょうか。1423793753.460.341866474681。

Einstein’s Only Mistake: Division by Zero

#divide by zero

TOP DEFINITION

A super-smart math teacher that teaches at HTHS and can divide by zero.

Hey look, that genius’s IQ is over 9000!

by October 21, 2009

Dividing by zero is the biggest known to mankind. It is a proven fact that a succesful division by zero will constitute in the implosion of the universe.

You are dividing by zero there, Johnny. Captain Kirk is not impressed.

LESS THAN HUMANが激安、あなたのほしいがきっと見つかる通販サイト

論文No1771

Excess Mucin Impairs Subglottic Epithelial Host Defense in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Jason Powell, James P. Garnett, Michael W. Mather, Faye A. H. Cooles, Andrew Nelson, Bernard Verdon, Jon Scott, Kasim Jiwa, Marie-Hélène Ruchaud-Sparagano, Stephen P. Cummings, John D. Perry, Stephen E. Wright, Janet A. Wilson, Jeffrey Pearson, Chris Ward, A. John Simpson

AJRCCM, Vol. 198, No. 3 | Aug 01, pp. 340–349, 2018.

＜背景＞

声帯下の感染性分泌物の誤嚥は人工呼吸患者において人工呼吸関連肺炎(VAP)を引き起こす。

重症患者の声帯下コロニゼーションのメカニズムははっきりしておらず、VAPの予防戦略は限られている。

＜目的＞

ICUで機械的人工呼吸をされている患者の声帯下の宿主防御機能異常を特徴づける；

声帯下のムチンが好中球貪食能の機能不全、細菌の成長に関与するかを調べる。

＜方法＞

機械的人工呼吸（４日以上挿管）患者から前向きに声帯下の分泌物サンプリングを行い、

同様にコントロール患者（挿管後３０分以内）からもサンプリングした。

コントロール患者からも声帯下上皮細胞も単離、培養を行った。

生化学的分析、宿主免疫防御の解析を行った。

＜結果＞

ICUで挿管中患者24名と新規挿管コントロール患者27名を検討した。

挿管中患者の声帯下サンプルは細菌の多様性が失われ、潜在的に呼吸器病原体を含んでいた。

挿管中患者のサンプルの微小環境は好中球炎症、

特に前炎症性サイトカインと好中球プロテアーゼの増加で特徴づけられ、

ムチンの蓄積があるなど生理的な声帯下分泌物の特徴が失われていた。

挿管中患者の声帯下ムチンは好中球の貪食能、殺菌能を障害していた。

貪食能の障害は去痰薬治療で改善した。

声帯下ムチンはヒト声帯下上皮の空気―液体インターフェイスモデルにおいて細菌の成長、浸潤を促進した。

＜感想＞

挿管がつづくと声帯下にムチンが増加し、

好中球の貪食能、殺菌能が障害されて細菌の増殖につながり、

VAPの原因となるようです。

Nationale: Aspiration of infective subglottic secretions causes ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in mechanically ventilated patients. Mechanisms underlying subglottic colonization in critical illness have not been defined, limiting strategies for targeted prevention of VAP.

Objectives: To characterize subglottic host defense dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU; to determine whether subglottic mucin contributes to neutrophil phagocytic impairment and bacterial growth.

Methods: Prospective subglottic sampling in mechanically ventilated patients (intubated for four or more days), and newly intubated control patients (intubated for less than 30 min); isolation and culture of primary subglottic epithelial cells from control patients; laboratory analysis of host innate immune defenses.

Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-four patients in the ICU and 27 newly intubated control patients were studied. Subglottic ICU samples had significantly reduced microbiological diversity and contained potential respiratory pathogens. The subglottic microenvironment in the ICU was characterized by neutrophilic inflammation, significantly increased proinflammatory cytokines and neutrophil proteases, and altered physical properties of subglottic secretions, including accumulation of mucins. Subglottic mucin from ICU patients impaired the capacity of neutrophils to phagocytose and kill bacteria. Phagocytic impairment was reversible on treatment with a mucolytic agent. Subglottic mucus promoted growth and invasion of bacterial pathogens in a novel air–liquid interface model of primary human subglottic epithelium.

Conclusions: Mechanical ventilation in the ICU is characterized by substantial mucin secretion and neutrophilic inflammation. Mucin impairs neutrophil function and promotes bacterial growth. Mucolytic agents reverse mucin-mediated neutrophil dysfunction. Enhanced mucus disruption and removal has potential to augment preventive benefits of subglottic drainage.

LESS THAN HUMAN夢をカタチに。

Hawaii Five-0 s04e19 Episode ScriptKu I Ka Pili Koko (Blood Brothers)We're in position.SWAT is all set.Give us the word, Commander.Three, two, one.Go! Go! Go! Well, maybe it's just me, but aren't there supposed to be guns in a gun deal? Maybe a gun dealer or something like that? Doesn't make sense.This is where the deal was supposed to go down.Looks like you boys got some bad intel.Well, maybe they caught wind we were coming and changed the menu.Or maybe the time got moved up and we're late to the party.Okay.Well, we'll canvass the area and see if anyone saw anything.All right.Catherine, do me a favor, call the ATF, all right? See if anything's come up on their radar.Roger that.Thanks for the backup, Lou.You got it.All right, fellas, let's pack it up.Maybe they moved up the time? What do you want me to say? Maybe that you were wrong.That we should have vetted this thing properly before we wasted everybody's time.Maybe listening to a convicted felon is not the right move.I-I don't want to put words in your mouth though.You know what I mean? Let me tell you something.That son of a bitch-- he's laughing in his cell right now.Let's go.Just for the record, this is the same thing as admitting you were wrong.Yeah, okay.You hear that? He's alive, but barely.What's your name? Who did this to you? Bomb.Bomb.(Hawaii Five-O theme song plays) I thought you said we were gonna take things slow.I'm willing to forget that I said that.Me, too.Hey.Morning.What are you doing, sneaking out on me? No, I just thought I'd make us some coffee.You come and get back in bed.I'll go make the coffee.I think I can manage, Jersey.Yeah? Yeah.Hi.Grace.What are you doing here? You're supposed to be with your mom.Her flight changed; she had to leave early.Well, you got to call me.You got to let me know if something changes.I tried to last night; it kept going to voice mail.Ah.Um, this is my friend Amber.Uh, Amber, this is, um this is my daughter Grace.This is my friend Amber.I've heard so much about you.Is that my dad's shirt? My daughter's been scarred for life, and you think it's funny.That's great.What, you don't think you're overreacting a little bit? No, I don't.Come on, man.The amount of time you and Amber have been spending together, those two were bound to meet sooner or later.Now, you know, well, Gracie will never forget.That's nice.Look, uh the last thing I need is for Grace to get attached to another woman.Okay? I mean, when Gabby took off, it really upset her, and I-I don't want to put her through that again.Uh-huh."Uh-huh"? What is "uh-huh"? What does that mean? Nothing.No-no-no, please.If you have something to say, just say it.Okay.Maybe you should consider, this is less about protecting Gracie, more about protecting yourself.Protecting myself from what? From getting into another serious relationship.She's ten years younger than me.What am I gonna do? Danny, if she was the same age as you, you would come up with a different excuse, whatever you need, because you can't be happy.It's impossible for you; it-it's not in your DNA.W-Wow.Well, I don't know what the hell I was doing coming here getting relationship advice from you.What do you know? I know people.No, you know how to kill people.There's a big difference.McGarrett.Yeah.We got to go.JC Dekker.How's the surfboard business? You tell me.State of Hawaii became the proud owner of that when you threw me in here.Well, that's because your problem was trying to diversify.You should've just stuck with selling surfboards instead of going to the guns.Warden says you got something for us.I do.There's a supplier out of the Philippines bringing in a big shipment.Top of the line semi-autos.No serials, completely untraceable.Type of product that attracts the, uh worst type of buyer.Okay.When's this going down? An hour from now.But you want to know where, you got to put something on the table for me.Oh, why, the ATF stopped returning your calls? We heard that you been supplying them intel, as well, for time off your sentence.Listen, a month here and there ain't making a dent.Now, as much as I hate helping Five-O, you boys got a cozy relationship with the governor.I figure you can get me some new digs at Waiawa.Minimum security, cut my sentence in half.That's very ambitious.Now I know why you're so good selling guns yourself.I'm a changed man.I'm just trying to get home to my family.Now, listen, my word's good on this.Just make sure it doesn't come back to me.Looks like you two just have to trust me.Danny! Danny! Danny! Danny? Chin, are you okay? This is Captain Grover.I got a collapsed building.Address: 1085 Ahua Street.Expedite fire and rescue.I need all available units.Steve! Danny! Danny! You got to get out of there, Catherine, it's not safe.They're down here! Danny! Danny! Danny! Steve.Danny! Steve.Danny.Danny.Hey.I got you, buddy.I'm right here.I got you.My leg's pinned.I think I broke a rib.Where's the other guy? Huh? He's dead.Okay, listen to me, this thing's too heavy.I can't lift it.I got no cell service down here, so I can't call for help.Okay.I'm gonna go get something to give me some leverage, get this off your leg, okay? I'll be right back.All right.Whoa-whoa-whoa.Don't go just yet.Danny, relax, it's gonna be okay.Is it okay? 'Cause I'm in a confined space with a bunch of concrete on top of me, and given my present condition, that's not the best situation for me.You know what I mean? Right, right, right.Claustrophobia.Yeah.Okay.Take a deep breath, okay? No, that's no good.It makes it worse.Danny, I got to get this off you.You understand me? All right, all right, okay.All right, Carter's behind the plate.We got Santana Hey, hey, hey.Hernandez.Hernandez playing first.Backman's playing second base.What are you doing? Helps me relax.I just recite the '86 Mets lineup.It helps me relax.Oh, that's great.That's good.No, that's good.I'll be back, all right? Okay.Santana's playing shortstop.Good.Sit down.Knight.Knight's on third.You have any idea where your boys were when this thing came down? No idea.Last time we saw them was on the bottom floor.That's roughly and concrete between us and them.We need to set up water, power and gas.I think that's already been done.We need to get in there and get them out of there.Before I start bringing in heavy equipment and putting my people at risk, I need to determine if this is rescue or recovery.I understand you have a personal relationship with these guys.You damn right, Hank.I know these guys.They're survivors.And the longer we stand around here waiting around, the less chance they have of coming out of there alive.Protocol is: we don't dig until we've located bodies.The sooner we pinpoint their location, the sooner we come up with a game plan, all right? Do your best.Any update? No.We're still trying to locate them.Catherine and I have been trying their cells, but it goes straight to voice mail.We were set up.Bonilla's playing right field.Bret Saberhag Bret Bret Saberhagen's on the mound.Where the hell you been? I moved on to the '92 roster.It's a tough year.I found a flashlight.We're gonna need that.Okay.You got to get this thing off of me.Okay.When I lift this, you feel the weight come off your leg, I need you to roll out, slide your leg out, okay? But you got to do it quick.I don't know how long I can hold this.That's very encouraging.I'm not even sure I can move.You can.You can.You can, all right? Uh-huh.All right, you ready? One, two, three.Roll, roll, roll! Oh, that's no good.Okay.You stay still.I got to look at this.Come on.Oh, what is that? Okay, it's a piece of rebar.It's missed your vitals, but I got to take it out.The trick's gonna be to stop the bleeding.Maybe don't take it out.Maybe we just leave it in for a minute.Leaving it in is not an option.This gets infected, sepsis sets in, then we got real trouble.You understand me? We got to As opposed to our current sit
uation? Okay, stay still.I'm gonna be right back.Okay.All right, this has got peroxide in it.I can disinfect this wound.I'm not gonna lie to you; this is gonna hurt a lot.The really bad pain only lasts a couple of seconds.You got to stay conscious.I'm right here.All right? Ready? Two.Three.Oh! God! All right, all right.Stay with me, Danny.Stay with me.Hey, who played left? '86 Mets, left field-- who was it? George Foster, and he was replaced by Mookie Wilson after two seasons.Midseason, rig? That's my boy.Keep the pressure.Keep the pressure, Danny.Stay with me.How we looking? Is it good? It's good.Pretty good.Oh.Come on.Keep your weight off that leg.Nah, I'm good.Let's get the hell out of here.Come on.No, Danny.Hold up.Uh, which way? We're not going anywhere, buddy.Place is caved in.We can't get out of here.Do me a favor, would you, please? Of course.Whatever you need.Look at me in the eye-- look at me-- and admit something to me.We should not have listened to Dekker, hmm? You want to do that now? It was a lead we had to follow, Danny, okay? And by the way, you're welcome for saving your life.What is that, a souvenir? Yeah, it's a souvenir.Rescue team would have arrived already.They'd be listening in.Find something to bang on, make some noise.Sorry.That was rude.What were you saying? Look, man, I'm telling you.My information was good.Now, if the deal got messy, it's not on me.Wrong.It's all on you.And I want the names of the people who helped you pull this off.You must have lost some hearing in that explosion.I was just doing my civic duty and passing along what I heard.From who? Half the prison just saw you haul my ass off the yard.Now, if I give up my source, I'm a dead man.Know what I think? I think there never was a source.I think this is all payback for Five-O putting you in here.Why would I do that? I'm trying to get the hell out of here, not add more years.We're gonna find out how you did this.Let me tell you something else.If they die down there, I'm gonna kill you myself.Someone on the outside had to rig the explosives.Why don't you pull Dekker's visitor log and phone records.Let's see who he's been communicating with since he got here.Chin, Dekker's not going anywhere.We should be back there trying to find Steve and Danny.Hey, we got the best people doing everything they can to rescue them.Our job is to work the case just like any other.We owe it to them to do that.I got something! Over here! All right, hold the work! Hold the work! Everybody, quiet! Everybody stop moving! It's them.They're alive.Yes.Hank? All right, the noise seems to be coming from this area.My engineers are already working on an extraction plan.All right, how long? Oh, there's a lot of guesswork here.GPR isn't giving us an image.Without knowing their precise location, it could take hours.Cath, where you going? See if we can get a microphone close enough to hear them.Maybe we can get a cellular repeater down there.This is pointless.They can't hear us.Oh, oh! What? Can I die in peace, please? You're tired and you're hurting; just take a break, all right? Hey.Do me a favor.What? Please, for once in your life, just pretend you're a human being, and take this situation for what it is.Can you do that for me, please? I'm keenly aware of the situation Really? Because the human response to certain death and, uh, the prospect of never seeing the people you love ever again is curling up into the fetal position and messing your pants.Okay, what good's that gonna do you, huh? Fear is a state of mind, Danny, okay? You got to fight through it.Oh, I-I disagree.I think that fear is actually your friend.It tells you when you're supposed to avoid a situation.But you never listen to it.That is why we are here in the first place.That would be a compelling argument, my friend, if you weren't afraid of absolutely everything.This morning, you had a near mental breakdown because your girlfriend met your kid.It doesn't matter what the situation is for you.You gravitate to the worst possible outcomes.Once again, I'm proven right! We never should have gone in this situation blind in the first place! You all right? No, I'm not all right.Listen, all right? I'm sorry, okay? Just please relax.The air is getting thin in here.We got to conserve this oxygen.Okay.Hey! Hey, hey! What? Maybe it's, uh, lack of oxygen, but something ain't sitting right with me.We were Dekker's target, right? Why this guy? Why the half-dead guy in the closet? The call lured us in here.For all we know, this guy was bait.Why him? I mean, you take a guy off the street, beat him half to death.Why him, specifically? I don't know.My guess is: he wasn't chosen at random; that's my guess.He's got no wallet.Couple pills.I don't know.Medication, prescription, something.Check his cell phone.It's all busted up.Steve.This guy's wired.He's wearing a camera.That's how they knew when to detonate.That guy had somebody watching.Is that you? Huh? It's me.It's Catherine.It's Catherine.Catherine.Steve! Thank God.Are you guys all right? Yeah, Danny's a little banged up, but we're okay.Everybody else get out? All accounted for except you two stragglers.We got the whole cavalry up here working to get you guys out.Great.We got an ETA on that? I'm literally being held together by duct tape.Yeah, we're working on it.We need to know your exact location.We're in the maintenance room, south side of the garage.Got it.Get over here.Steve, how's the oxygen? It's running low.Is there anything we can do from this end to speed things up? Just hang tight.Listen, the entire area is unstable.You go moving something you're not supposed to, the whole damn thing'll come crashing down.Ah, that's encouraging.Steve, what happened? You were right behind us.Listen, you think you can establish a video call? I want to show you something.Hi-ya.It's not as bad as it looks.Thanks for trying to make me feel better.You say you wanted to show us something.Yeah, take a look at this.Cath, can you capture that? Got it.I'll run these photos through the database and see if I can get an I.D.Look for any connection to JC Dekker and his crew, all right? I want to know how this guy got down here.Roger that.Those pills you found on your victim are warfarin-- It is an anticoagulant commonly used to treat patients with heart conditions.Well, how common is it, Max? Catherine couldn't I.D.this guy; that's our only lead.Well, it's the most widely prescribed blood thinner out there.Can you open his shirt? Max, what are you looking for? Well, his current state of death aside, your victim is young and appears to be in good physical condition, which leads me to suspect that the victim was prescribed this drug post-op-- not to treat a chronic heart condition.Yeah, Max, good call.He's got a surgical scar right here.Gall bladder.Maybe kidneys.From the look of the scar, it appears that he went under the knife in the last three months.All right, Max, listen, contact all area hospitals.Get a list of patients who have had similar surgeries.Cross-reference them against our vic's description, okay? Right away, Commander.I can't let you through.Sir, please, I I just need to find out if Detective Williams is okay.I'm sorry, ma'am.He's a friend of mine.My name is Amber Vitale.If-if there's anything Uh, she's good.She's with me.Amber? Yeah.I'm Kono.I work with Danny.I just saw it on the news, and I got over here as fast as I could, but nobody's telling me anything.He's alive.Okay.We're doing everything we can to get him to safety.Come on, I'll find you a seat.Danny's gonna want to see you when he gets out.We any closer to getting those guys out? Thanks to Catherine, we know where they are, but, uh, still trying to find a way down.How you holding up? I'm, uh I'm just trying to stay positive.This is a lot worse than I imagined.You got something, Max? Surgical records for every gall bladder and kidney operation performed in the last three months.John Doe's description.Okay, good.I'll run the list through DMV and see if I can put together a photo array.I don't think that's gonna be necessary.Take a look at this name.Marcus Dekker.So our victim is JC Dekker's brother.He's 25 years old.He had his gall bl
adder removed last month, and warfarin was prescribed to him to treat his post-op clotting issues.Marcus just graduated from UCLA Law four months ago.He just moved home and was studying for the bar.Guess who bankrolled his education.His big brother? That's right.So how did their relationship go from that to this? Unless Dekker didn't put him down here.What are you thinking, Steve? Dekker's been working with ATF for months now, right? What if somebody he helped to put away found that out and used it against him? Right, so Dekker gets a fake tip about a gun deal, he passes it on.They know he's gonna pass it on.So, bomb goes off, few cops get killed, and, uh, Dekker takes the fall.And as added insult, they throw his brother down there to send a message.It's a cold way to get revenge.Marcus was a good kid, man.He did well in school, never got into trouble.I made sure of that.I was always looking out for him.So he wouldn't go down the same path as you.That's why you put him through law school? When I got busted, Marcus found out where the money came from.He wanted nothing to do with me.I was hoping to get out of here one day and make things right.And that's why you turned informant, so you could get an early release.Well, someone inside this prison took exception to that.Two of our guys are trapped, and Marcus is dead.They tried to pin that all on you.The tip came from a guy on my block, goes by the name of Spider.Said he was giving me the info 'cause he couldn't use it.Didn't that seem suspicious to you? Guy's a lifer.What good was it to him? Think, JC.Why would Spider set you up? I don't know.Up until now, we've been cool.Never had any beef with him.Let's pull his file.I want to know everything about him before we get him in a room.Spider's never gonna talk to you.You have nothing to offer a guy serving life.There's another way to do this.Here.I'd prefer not to drink toilet water.It isn't toilet water.It's not from a fresh mountain spring, okay, but it's not sewage.It's drinkable, Danny.Take it.Don't look at it.It's over 100 degrees down here.If you want to live, drink the water.Ah, it's awesome.We've looked at every possible extraction point.None are stable enough to bring in the equipment we need to get down there.Hey, how are we supposed to get them out? We can't.At least not from where they are.We got to get them moving.Now, there's a mechanical room If they can somehow make their way over there, we may be able to pull them up through the ventilation shaft.as well be 30 miles.Well, I didn't say it was gonna be easy.They're gonna have to navigate some tight spaces, move heavy debris with little to no light.Well, they'll never make it.Danny's injured.Hank, just tell me one thing.Is this our only option? If we do nothing, they'll run out of oxygen.Oh, good.The, uh escape-through-the-vent trick.That's-that's the big plan? That's what we're gonna do? That's great.It's our best shot.Okay, well, what about the part where we're not supposed to touch anything; if we do, the whole thing could cave in on us? That's still true, so please be careful.Do me a favor.You know that sushi place you like so much on King Street? Give them call, make a reservation for tonight, you and me, okay? I'm just gonna have to grab a quick shower first.Will do.Hey, Danny, there's someone here who wants to talk to you.It's okay.Hey.Hey, Jersey.Hey, doll.You look fantastic.Been that kind of a day, huh? Sorry about this morning.I meant to call you, but, uh Save it.I've heard that whole trapped-under-the-building excuse before.I'd laugh, only it hurts too much.How'd you, uh how'd you know to come down here? Well, it was all over the news.Okay, Amber, listen to me.Uh Grace gets out of school in a little while, and, uh and Rachel's out of town.Of course, I'll pick her up.Um what do you want me to tell her? Uh, tell her that I'm running late.I'll be home in a little bit.Um Listen, you can't let her use her phone, uh, can't let her leave the house, can't let her turn on the TV.So, you want me to tell her she's grounded? Exactly.Tell her she's grounded.She's gonna want to talk to you.Tell her I'll talk to her right when I get home.Surprise, bitch.I'm guessing that belonged to Spider? His jaw's being wired shut right about now.I doubt he'll be needing that.So that explains how he coordinated the bombing.Contraband phone.Guards couldn't monitor his calls.Except Spider had nothing to do with no bomb.What are you talking about? He said, a couple weeks back, a stranger hit him up on his cell.Told him to check his commissary balance.He does, there's five Gs in there.So, next time Mystery Man calls, he's got Spider's attention.Said there's another 20 large in it for him if he gets me to drop a tip about an upcoming gun buy.So this stranger on the outside used Spider to feed you the information.And Spider convinced me the ATF was selling me short, and you guys would give me a better deal.Turns out, he only got paid if I delivered the tip to Five-O.This was never about a prison beef.This was someone coming after us.We work together, we get out of here.All right? Give me a hand with this thing.Oh, yeah.The worst game of Jenga ever.She's pretty.Oh.What? Amber.Can tell she really cares about you, too.Yeah, I'll probably screw it up like I do everything else.Right? Not in my DNA to be happy.I didn't mean that.That's not what I meant.No, I'm officially agreeing with you.There is something wrong with the way that I am built.I-I can't, uh I can't just enjoy happiness like regular people, you know? You don't think you're being a little hard on yourself? No, I don't.When I was a kid, my parents would go out to eat dinner.If they were late coming home, I used to imagine that they died in a car wreck, just 'cause they were 15 minutes late.And I used to talk to God and beg him.I said, "Please just take my dad, not my mom." 'Cause I couldn't live without my mom.I mean, every time something good happens in my life, I-I just I think of when it's gonna end.That's all I can think about.You for real? Yeah.That's not normal.I know it's not normal.Listen to this.On my wedding day, I'm looking at Rachel, just about to say "I do." And all I can see is the day she's gonna serve me with divorce papers.No joke.And I I don't know, man.The only sustained happiness I ever felt in my life so far is Grace.And, you know, it's just a matter of time before she turns 18, and then she's out the door and she marries some schmuck.I don't know.You got to change, man.You can't live like that.Well, I'd like very much to change.It's just not so simple, you know? Take Amber, all right? Start small.Instead of pushing her away, like you always do, fixate on how she's gonna break your heart, she's gonna destroy your life bring her in, bring her closer.All right, I'll give it a shot.What? I said I'll give it a shot.I make it out of here alive, I'll give it a shot.Really? Yeah, really.That's good.That's good.Thank you.Oh, oh! What the hell was that? Damn it.I can't get ahold of them.All nonessential personnel, fall back now! Move, move, move! That includes you two.We're not going anywhere.What's doing? It's too heavy.You know, I'm trying, uh, really hard to stay positive here.What are you looking for? I'm looking for that.You see that piece of pipe hanging over you, Danny? Break it off and seal off one end for me.What are you gonna do with it? This slab of concrete-- I'm gonna blow it up.You're gonna what? How does this not end with both of us dying? You're gonna blow something up? Called a directional charge.Sends the explosive energy in one direction.Anything that's behind it, theoretically, is reasonably safe.It's, what, reasonably Nothing of what you just said sounds reasonable, okay? It's the best I could do.This gonna work? I don't know.Back up.Get up in there.Hold on.Before we do this, I just want you to know one thing.What? Whatever happens, I really, really from the bottom of my heart, hate you so much.I love you, too, pal.I guess there's a lot worse people to die under a big pile of concrete with, huh? You want to do the honors? No, no.It's your stupid idea-- you do it.Hold the work! Nobody move! What is that? We got to
move out.Move, move, move! Give me a light.Let's go.Pull back.Hank, you see anything down there? Hank! We got movement.Bring up the line now! Go! Bring up the line! Danny, come on.Come on.Here you go, here you go.I got you.I got you.Steve.You got to get Steve.He's still down there.Let's get that line down there.Hurry up! Let's get that looked at, huh? It's coming, Steve.It's coming.Oh, yeah, come on.This way, this way, this way.Thank God.It's good to see you topside, Commander.I never worried, never worried.I don't doubt it.It's good to see you, boss.Guys, thank you.Danno! I'm okay, monkey.All right.I'm okay.I'm all right.Hey, I want you to meet somebody.This is Steve McGarrett.Amber.Hi.Nice to finally meet you.You, too.Guys, give me one sec with Steve, all right? Well, if this is the, uh, power of positive thinking, I, uh I like it.It's good.You know, it's the same as you, uh you admitting that I was right, but I don't want to put words in your mouth right now.When we were in there, you said, uh you know, before you did the thing with the bomb, you said what you said.I want you to know, I I feel the same way.How is that exactly? Gonna make me say it? Come here.I love you.I love you, buddy.I-I, uh, got to go get this properly stitched up Yeah, you should.And I'm not coming in to work tomorrow.Or for the rest of the week.Good.All right? I'm taking Amber to Maui.Heal up over there, relax.Nice beaches over there.Nice beaches? I won't see a single one of them.All right? Call me.Hey.Hey.Fong ran Spider's cell.In the past 48 hours, he got three incoming calls, all from the same number.- We get a name? - No, it's a burner.But it's on right now, and we triangulated a position.What's the location? It's an office building in Chinatown.There's only one tenant.It's a consulting firm owned by an Edward Cobb.Edward Cobb.Who's Edward Cobb? And why the hell is he coming after us? Edward Cobb is ex-CIA.He ran black ops in Southeast Asia in the '70s.This was never about Five-O.After being trapped under the rubble for several hours, Commander McGarrett and Detective Williams were rescued just a short time ago.The cause of the explosion is still under investigation.Honolulu Fire Chief Hank Iona is expected to make a statement very soon.Looks like you had a bad day, Commander.Not as bad as you would've liked.I know you set me up to keep me quiet about Cambodia.But I'm still here.Question is: have you gotten the message? No.That's pretty clever.They would've pulled three bodies out of that rubble, assumed that Dekker's brother was killed for payback and Five-O got caught in the middle.No one ever would've suspected that this was all about keeping me from asking questions you didn't want answered.You should've listened to Sam, left this alone.An innocent man died today.For no reason.And dozens, dozens of innocent lives were put in danger, all to clean up a mess that you made 40 years ago.Now, what happened in Cambodia? Who was buried in that grave? Consider your next move very carefully.You consider yours.I still got DNA from that grave, and I'm gonna run it.So you might as well tell me who it belongs to.Lei Kuan Fat.Wo Fat's mother.Why would you cover that up? Because it wasn't supposed to be her in that grave.Our target was Wo Fat's father, but the op went bad.My agent on the ground disappeared, leaving me to clean up her mess.That agent was my mother.But she went on to work for the agency, while you were forced out.She didn't botch the job.You ordered an unsanctioned hit that went bad.Wo Fat's father is still alive, isn't he? Do you have any idea the fallout if that ever came to light? Where is he? Sit down.I'll tell you.Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/view_episode_scripts.php?tv-show=hawaii-five-0&episode=s04e19

LESS THAN HUMAN 関連ツイート

We human beings no less make mistakes than we breathe.
私たち人間が呼吸をするのが当然であるように，私たち人間がミスを犯すのも当然のことである。

RT @NoMoreGorae: It no less gets the visual information from the camera than human beings see with the eyes.
人間が目でものを見るように，それはカメラから視覚情報を得る。

It no less gets the visual information from the camera than human beings see with the eyes.
人間が目でものを見るように，それはカメラから視覚情報を得る。

RT @puku3wafu: やっぱ吉高ちゃんとのペアは最高だよね〜ってうろうろしてたら突き当たった。誰か買って〜👓

less than human（レスザンヒューマン）　『蛇にピアス』×less than human [ウェア&シューズ] less than hum……

モンスターペアレントからの視点で読み解くLESS THAN HUMAN

“次の時代”に行けなかった龍馬・信長

■“独学”の成果を上げるコツ

■丸々一冊を読破する必要はない

LESS THAN HUMAN大応援サイト♪

厳選！ 「LESS THAN HUMAN」の超簡単な活用法7個

なぜ古代の人々はそら豆を「死の象徴」として恐れていたのか？

#divide by zero

LESS THAN HUMANが激安、あなたのほしいがきっと見つかる通販サイト

LESS THAN HUMAN夢をカタチに。

厳選！「LESS THAN HUMAN」の超簡単な活用法7個